Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Opinion > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Sunday, April 27, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (7 comment(s))

History shows National Day of Prayer is appropriate


.
May 1 is the National Day of Prayer. I am thankful to live in a country where this is observed each year. Having a National Day of Prayer is not only consistent with our nation’s history, but it is fitting for all people of faith.

Historically, because our nation was founded on essential freedoms, not the least of which is freedom of religion, prayer has been a vital part of our country. In 1775, the Continental Congress asked the colonies to pray for wisdom in forming a nation. On Feb. 19, 1795, George Washington proclaimed a day of public thanksgiving and prayer.
On March 30, 1863, Abraham Lincoln signed a congressional resolution that called for a day of fasting and prayer during the Civil War. On April 17, 1952, a bill proclaiming an annual National Day of Prayer was unanimously passed by both houses of Congress. President Truman signed it into law. It required the president to select a day for national prayer each year. And finally on May 5, 1988, President Reagan signed into law that the first Thursday in May be the National Day of Prayer each year.

Reagan said, “On our National Day of Prayer, then, we join together as people of many faiths to petition God to show us his mercy and his love, to heal our weariness and uphold our hope, that we might live ever mindful of his justice and thankful for his blessing.”

Some will want to cite the “separation of church and state” as a reason why we should not have a day of prayer. In fact, the term “separation of church and state” appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution. The concept of “separation of church and state” stems from the opening clause in the Bill of Rights that states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …”

This clause was never meant to keep the church out of the state, but rather to keep the state out of the church. This clause was to keep the state from establishing a national religion. It was to keep the state from interfering with the free exercise of religion in our nation.

The First Amendment was never meant to keep people from practicing their faith or bringing religion into the daily affairs of our nation. This is why the founding fathers would often quote from the Bible, ask for God’s help and have clergy offer prayers at certain events.

If you want to see numerous examples of this, go to www.wallbuilders. com. It is very unfortunate that in our culture today this clause has been twisted and misused to cause people to think that doing anything in the name of God on public property or at public events is wrong.

In times of great uncertainty, economic fear and moral collapse, why would anyone not want our nation to ask for divine help? Even those who do not believe in God certainly would see no harm in those who do believe in God asking for His blessing on our nation. This day of prayer is not a day to pressure anyone to follow Jesus. It is not a day for preaching and proselytizing. It is simply a day to ask the almighty to help us. Doing this will not harm anyone and could help

everyone.

Here in the 7 Rivers Region, for the past 12 years we have had a Mayoral Prayer Breakfast on the National Day of Prayer. Christians from all denominations come together to pray for our nation as well as our local leaders and public servants. It is a great display of humility, unity and faith in God.

For those who want to replace this day of prayer with a “day of reason,” please be reasonable and see the historical basis for this day as well as the practical benefits of having it.

David Holt is senior pastor of First Evangelical Free Church, in Onalaska, Wis.
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

ReadingSports wrote on Apr 28, 2008 9:04 PM:

" Simply put youre using Matthew 6:5-6 completely out of context, and it does not apply National Day of Prayer.

I feel that youre quick to call others hypocrites because we dont share your view of how we should practice our faith. Your statement comes across, to me, as presumptuous and arrogant.
Next time try Micah 6:8 instead.
Though I am praying for you. In this, I am proud to be a hypocrite!

"

ReadingSports wrote on Apr 28, 2008 1:05 PM:

" all of the worlds problems are due to religion?
I was using hyperbole.

You said, Was it atheism that motivated the 9/11 attacks? ...crusades? ... witch at the stake, or suppressed scientific progress ...? I can't think of any atrocity ...in...atheism. The major religions of the day cannot say the same thing.

So Christianity is responsibly for the 9/11 attacks now? You seem to say that Christianity is on balance bad and atheism is on balance good. Im sorry, but that strikes me as somehow dishonest, but maybe I misunderstood. There are people in both camps, people sin. (Sorry, I know the s word may offend you.) Or perhaps we should toss useless and baseless accusations back and forth. Ill see your crusades and raise you Pol Pot, or how about Stalin? Chairman Mao perhaps?
"

ReadingSports wrote on Apr 28, 2008 1:03 PM:

" If more Christians actually read the Bible, there would be a lot more atheists.
Would it be fair to say that you feel that Christians dont read the Bible, and when they do they become atheists? Yes, of course I see the light now! Seriously, I may know more Christians than you, and lots of us read the Bible everyday. While it is anecdotal evidence, I feel that you statement MAY lack credibility.

In fact, by my experience, it is those that dont read the Bible and dont practice the faith that generally turn away. Us ignorant Christians often refer to those folks as church-goers. For it is what you put into Christianity, like anything else, that determines what you get out of it.
"

midwestatheist wrote on Apr 27, 2008 11:03 PM:

" To Readingsports- you said, "I think it's great that so many atheists are reading the Bible."

If more Christians actually read the Bible, there would be a lot more atheists.

Nobody misquoted the Bible, Jesus was saying that those who make a big show of their faith are hypocrites. Just like the people who need a giant illuminated cross on a hill to affirm their shaky faith.

And please show me where we wrote that all of the worlds problems are due to religion? Instead of making stuff up and building straw men, please address what is actually written. "

ReadingSports wrote on Apr 27, 2008 8:14 PM:

" I think it's great that so many atheists are reading the Bible. Theyre almost as proficient as a power or principality.

Faith is always personal, but never private. Are you that intolerant of others beliefs? One could ask that you keep your atheism to yourself as well. Are you arrogant enough to misquote scripture to tell others not to practice their faith? Are you dishonest enough to say that all the worlds problems are due to religion?

"

midwestatheist wrote on Apr 27, 2008 3:22 PM:

" Matthew 21:21- Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done. And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive....

Tell it to Madeline Neumann. "

BrianGSmith wrote on Apr 27, 2008 9:48 AM:

" Matthew 6:5-6
"And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father in secret shall reward thee openly."
In other words.....keep it to yourself. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.