Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Mn > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Saturday, May 10, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (No comments posted.)

Judges deliver major setback to Big Stone II project


.
ST. PAUL — The proposed Big Stone II power plant suffered a major setback Friday when two administrative law judges recommended against allowing transmission lines from the plant to be built across west-central Minnesota.

If the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission accepts that recommendation, the project could be doomed, said Dan Sharp, a spokesman for the five utilities that are seeking to build the plant.
“The transmission lines are critical and unless we can build the transmission lines in Minnesota, the project can’t go,” Sharp said.

The administrative law judges held that the five utilities had failed to show that demand for electricity couldn’t be better and more cost-effectively met with renewable energy and greater energy efficiency. And they also wrote that the utilities had not adequately considered the impact the coal-fired plant would have on global warming.

The utilities want to build the plant next to an existing plant near Milbank in eastern South Dakota, a few miles west of Ortonville, Minn. It would serve 1 million people, about half of them on the western plains of Minnesota. The power lines in question would run to Granite Falls and Willmar.

A coalition of environmental groups that oppose the plant welcomed Friday’s recommendation.

Michael Noble, executive director of Fresh Energy, said he expects the PUC will follow the judges’ advice.

“It would be almost impossible now for the state Public Utilities Commission to approve this new coal plant,” Noble said. “There’s been years and years of testimony and thousands of pages of evidence, and all of it gets summed up by saying that energy efficiency and renewable energy are better for consumers.”

Sharp said the utilities will now make the same arguments to the PUC that it did to the judges: that the plant would go a long way toward addressing the region’s growing need for power, and that Big Stone II is the lowest-cost option. All the alternatives would cost consumers more, he said.

“It’s going to show up in their electric bill just like they’re facing at the gas pump,” he said.

Sharp pointed out that the PUC is not bound by the judges’ recommendation. He said he expects the PUC will hold hearings in early to mid-June and deliberate what to do by the end of June.

South Dakota officials have already approved major permits for the $1.5 billion plant.

The five utilities backing the plant are Otter Tail Power Co., the Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Heartland Consumers Power District, Missouri River Energy Services, and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.

On the Net:

Big Stone II: http://www.bigstoneii.com
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.