Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > News > Story
 Advertisement 

Published - Wednesday, May 21, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (10 comment(s))

Now-famous missing anchor resurfaces


.
An anchor believed stolen from outside the former Naval Reserve Station resurfaced Tuesday.

No, it hadn’t been hauled off by thieves looking to trade it in for cash. Nor was it heisted as a high school prank.
The U.S. Navy took it.

Navy Cmdr. Kurt Hedberg told La Crosse police Tuesday the Navy removed the anchor from outside the building at 2226 Green Bay St. because it was federal property.

Hedberg was in charge of removing all federal property from the building when it was turned over to the city Dec. 31, 2007. The Navy had ceased operations at the station May 25, 2007, police said.

The 6-foot-tall, 500-pound gray-blue anchor with wrap-around black chain made national news Monday after it was reported stolen by Tom Sweeney, chairman of the Naval Reserve Center Memorial Oversight Committee. It could have been taken anytime between Dec. 31, 2007, and Wednesday, he said.

Hedberg said Tuesday the anchor was removed in November or December and taken to the Navy’s Operational Support Center in Minneapolis after he didn’t receive a request to keep the anchor at the La Crosse site and couldn’t find a base that wanted it.

Sweeney disagreed that the anchor is federal property, saying from what he understood, it was given to the center after the U.S. Army post where it once stood lost its designation.

“We were told it was not the Navy’s. They need to convince us that it’s theirs. I wish they told us they were taking it,” Sweeney said. “We need to get to bottom of this.”

The anchor never was assigned to a ship and has been outside the station since it was commissioned in 1949.

If the anchor is not federal property, Sweeney said the center would like it returned so it can be included as part of a planned memorial at the site.

Anne Jungen can be reached at (608) 791-8224 or ajungen@lacrossetribune.com.
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

mjblues wrote on May 22, 2008 3:14 AM:

" 'Hedberg said Tuesday the anchor was removed in November or December and taken to the Navys Operational Support Center in Minneapolis after he didnt receive a request to keep the anchor at the La Crosse site' - obviously Sweeney's request for the anchor is with the Mission accomplished banner and the WMD lol :) "

Darwinism wrote on May 21, 2008 7:42 PM:

" An anchor: a large device that's only purpose is to keep larger devices where you put them. This has gone missing and found in another state but confusion as to when it went missing or when it was actually "found". Now there's an arguement as to ownership between the city and the Navy. That's our government in action. Watch, they'll hire attorneys and take it to the Supreme Court to really provide job security all around. "

NAVY VET wrote on May 21, 2008 7:07 PM:

" How about his comment "they need to convince us that it's theirs"? You would think someone who retired from the Navy would realize he's got that backwards. An anchor that was from an Army Post that lost its designation and then given to the center screams nothing BUT federal property. And I love how this anchor somehow has "lost" 1500 pounds between yesterday and today. Let me just say that most of us Navy Vets are not this stupid. Of course, it makes him a PERFECT representative for the city, lol!! "

MJBLUES wrote on May 21, 2008 5:30 PM:

" "Sweeney disagreed that the anchor is federal property, saying from what he understood, it was given to the center after the U.S. Army post where it once stood lost its designation."
Since when does an ARMY post have an anchor on display? And isn't the Army considered part of the Federal Gov? And does Sweeny maybe have just a little too much time on his hands if this is the one thing in his life that needs to be gotten to the bottom of?

"

banger wrote on May 21, 2008 1:18 PM:

" Duh! Wouldn't you think Sweeney would have checked with the Navy before raising the ruckus with the police and media? "

Old_Fogey wrote on May 21, 2008 8:09 AM:

" The City took possession of the site on December 31, yet did not even bother to take inventory of what they were getting? Where was the City on December 31, when they should have been signing for the property they were receiving? I have to wonder what other property here the City does actually own, and was removed by thieves after December 31. "

davidinlse wrote on May 21, 2008 7:53 AM:

" Any yet, the local navy vet's claim they want to use it as a memorial. They don't even notice something like this. This property needs to be leveled and the property put on the tax roll. The city should do nothing but sell the property, let the developer do the work, the city would screw it up anyway. "

Rickey wrote on May 21, 2008 7:10 AM:

" Next thing The Navy will find the Mission Accomplished Banner and the WMD "

JD5400 wrote on May 21, 2008 6:28 AM:

" If it was so important you think they would have noticed it missing sometime in the last 5-7 months. Thats a lot of anchor to not notice it gone. "

The Moderate wrote on May 21, 2008 5:00 AM:

" LOL! But I thought Sweeney said it disappearded between 12/31/07 & yesterday. I guess he didn't know what he was talking about. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.