Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Packers > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Wednesday, July 16, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (17 comment(s))

HUNT COLUMN: Emotion aside, Packers made right call on Favre


.
Remove emotion from the unfortunate Brett Favre episode, and it pares down to this:

Did the Green Bay Packers—Mark Murphy, Ted Thompson, Mike McCarthy and everyone who opted to move forward with Aaron Rodgers as the No. 1 quarterback—make the right decision?
That we can’t know until some point this season.

Did they make the best decision?

Yes, they did.

Actually, Thompson, who bears responsibility as general manager, didn’t have to make that call.

Favre made it for him four months ago.

When a professional athlete says he can no longer give everything he’s got to a brutally demanding sport that requires complete mental and physical dedication, that’s it. Favre said he could still play, and no doubt he can, but declared before the world that he was mentally worn down by everything except the three-hour commitment on game day. As Favre correctly said, it would not be fair to anyone, including him, to be a three-hour-a-week football player.

The Packers asked Favre if he were absolutely sure. Of his own free will, he flew to Green Bay for the announcement. No one forced him to say he could no longer put himself through the drudgery of training camp and practice and the mind-numbing meetings. It’s the worst part of the job, but essential for teammates to be entirely certain that their leader is unconditionally committed to the group effort.

Now, does a man have the right to change his mind?

Of course he does, but only in situations he can control.

No matter how much power Favre wielded in Green Bay, he was still a player, still an employee, subject to the team’s decisions and the greater good of the franchise. A Hall of Fame player, yes, but a roster spot just like the other 52 Packers, no more, no less. The problem occurred when Favre became bigger than one of the most famous sports franchises in the world. That should never happen. It can only cause problems.

Like the colossal mess going on now.

Franchises stay. Players, no matter how beloved, go. Joe Namath taking a beating in a Los Angeles Rams uniform is a sad reminder.

People got caught up in a cult of personality with Favre. They adored him for his down-home and common-man sensibilities, and his charm. That’s genuinely him.

Did he use that to his advantage in a place like Green Bay? Sure. Favre occasionally got a pass from the fans and portions of the media, me included, when he would’ve been booed or ripped elsewhere for boneheaded mistakes.

But when a player continues to play that card in a situation where it is patently unfair to everyone involved, it’s called something else. It’s selfish.

That would not have been an adjective applied to Favre as a player. But what are we to think now if he just wants to play so badly that nothing else matters? Ask yourself: Just to scratch that itch, would he really go back to a place like Atlanta with no chance to win?

Favre owes the Packers nothing. No better or worse than any franchise, Green Bay will use and abuse a player like them all.

Meanwhile, the Packers owe Favre nothing, other than his gigantic salary should he be reactivated.

The Packers don’t have to trade Favre, but they should. Let him play, but it can’t be here. That union is irrevocably broken.

Favre opted to take a knee. It was the best call by the player and the team.
.
 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 19, 2008 1:58 AM:

" Packer Backer - YOU hit it right on the head...The only reason for something like that is simply Ted Thompson's EGO, and his desire for PERSONAL GLORY. I would be curious to see the difference in VEGAS' preseason odd on the Pack with Favre at the helm vs with Rodgers leading the team. Thompson needs to be reigned in, and quickly...he does GREAT at spotting young, unnoticed talent...but he treats PEOPLE like junk...it's a shame. "

packerbacker wrote on Jul 18, 2008 12:07 PM:

" If you don't buy tickets or own stock, you aren't fan enough to have more than an opinion! I am sick and tired of disgruntled fans of other sports or other teams, bashing Favre and the Packers. The Packers need to listen to THEIR FANS! The best qb for the Pack is Brett Favre! The worst scenario is Brett winning another SUPER BOWL wearing another team's colors and the Pack sits with Rodgers, hurt, ineffective or just 8-8! Its a slap in anyone's face that broke the NFL ALL TIME QB starts record, to have TT say 'We want you back, but, we are going to start a 3 year veteran with NO STARTS over the guy that has 275 STARTS! "

free_speech wrote on Jul 17, 2008 5:11 AM:

" Then thank him for time served and cut him loose to play elsewhwre. "

slinger1919 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 2:19 PM:

" The team has since moved on. You just can't inject a player that the team revolves around. If Farve was a receiver or something the situation may enable him to come back. He is still a good player yes...but it is time to move on. Aaron Rogers needs to play and get experience. He may/will take sum lumps with a learning curve and all like any other qb but we can't live in the past and put off the inevitable. I just get a kick out of people who suggest the Packers are turning their back on a three-time MVP. That was around 10 years ago...quit living in the past! "

slinger1919 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 2:12 PM:

" People remember,

He WAS a three-time MVP. He is a future Hall of Famer. That does not mean he still can play to that level. Remember the NY Giants and Chicago games. Farve was all bundled up on the sidelines just waiting for Scottie to beam him out of there. Those two games alone showed everyone his desire has slipped some. The cold did not bother the qb's from the other teams. Bring him back...let's bring back Joe Namath, Joe Montanna, Steve Young etc. Like people keep saying...He's a MVP and Hall of Famer! Heck I quess we have to bring them all back! "

sglwiscguy wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:35 AM:

" My two and a half cents whorth.
The Packers say they want to do whats best for the team. It is clear that whats best for the team is to let the man play peroid. It almost seems as though there may be some age discrimination going on here. I am 49 and man oh man i sure hope that this is not the case.

In my 49 years i have made my share of mistakes just like everyone. Brett is no different.

Take a stand for Brett and get this thing done!!!!!!! "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:20 AM:

" "freebies" I won't disagree on the "black eye" comment: Ted Thompson has brought disrespect and mistrust to the organization, and it started with his treatment of the front office early in his tenure. It has evolved to a power hungry leader burning bridges, trashing relationships, and lying to players (see Favre's transcript from his Fox interview) in order to perpetrate HIS OWN legacy. Ted has always said that no one player is bigger than the team, but he obviously doesn't hold that same belief in regard to HIS legend and mark on Packerland. HOWEVER, "Favre washed up"? THAT's just crazy talk, even for you "freebie". "

free_speech wrote on Jul 16, 2008 6:04 AM:

" "2020" - Is that the year you expect the Packers to be competitive again? I thought Favre was a future Hall of Famer who still has game? I guess not. I guess he is washed up after all. Funny how fickle you brainashed packer backers are. You always want to believe they are right, but they rarely are. This is one big black eye on the best years the Packers have had in franchise history. If they can treat the Almighty Favre this way, why would ANY player stay loyal? Disintegration waiting to happen. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 15, 2008 6:29 PM:

" "free balogna" - That's the funny thing about those "unknown commodoties", they are often worth more as unknowns than they are as proven players...funny how THAT works now isn't it? Dissintegrating? Really? Let's see how this plays out before you get too excited...I think the Pack may come out in pretty good shape. We'll wait and see........penny for your thoughts......oops....free spender that I am I couldn't help myself.........I want my change "free" "

packer backer wrote on Jul 15, 2008 4:35 PM:

" First, free speech, blah blah blah blah blah... On to more interesting info. Letting Brett just walk out the door is just plain stupid. Ziggy would have a jet warming up in Green Bay even if he thought that was an option. Now trade Brett to Miami for Taylor would be a pretty good choice. AFC team, pretty much no chance to go anywhere and G.B. get a sack leader. Everyone happy! "

my2centsworth wrote on Jul 15, 2008 4:23 PM:

" Brett Favre is a legend and a football god.
It is my hopes that this somewhat of an embarrassing soap opera doesn't stain that image
because he had a change of heart. He must understand the fact that Green Bay has given
him every opportunity to remain the leader of the pack and even return after he made the
decision to move on because he "...just couldn't do it anymore". I am compelled to respect
the Packer organization for their decisions of sustaining continuity for the future of the team.
I also realize that trading him would be in the best interest of the team from a competative
perspective, However, releasing him would pacify his "itch" and allowing him to play for whoever. Although, how many teams are ready for this type of drama
that only packer fans have and could endure? "

free_speech wrote on Jul 15, 2008 1:42 PM:

" Shunning Favre is sacrilege. Now we know why they gave him his locker. Then they are going to retire his jersey? He won't even show up. What hypocricy. I love seeing the pathetic Packers disintegrating before my very eyes. And packattack - 4 quality QB's? 3 unknown commodities and they are dispatching a 17 year hall of fame veteran. I LOVE IT! "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:21 PM:

" oh...and one more thing...I GREATLY disagree with you freespch on this point: the Packer organization is a GREAT organization, and it has the history to support that claim. What is rotten right now, is the Lead Dog...Thompson. I have been a Packer fan for a long time, but this is the most disgruntled I have seen veterans of this team that have left since Thompson took over. He burns bridges and trashes relationships like the PEOPLE don't matter...it'll come back to bite the whole organization if the course is not corrected soon. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:14 PM:

" First - free speech, clean it up, there is no reason for the language on your first post.
Second - free speech, I semi agree with you (what IS the world coming to?)...in that the Packers DO owe Favre more for what he has given them through the years. Yet, Rodgers has bided his time patiently and with dedication. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 15, 2008 12:14 PM:

" The problem here, is that NFL Football is in the business of winning, and the organization needs to decide who TRULY gives them the best opportunity to win. Can Ted Thompson REALLY believe that Aaron Rodgers is going to lead this team farther than Brett? Having 4 (ironic count) quality QBs is not such a bad situation to be stuck in: invariably, prior to the final cut, someone is out for the season...we now have considerable trade value at a KEY position. Bring Brett back, and let the competition for leading the Pack begin!! "

free_speech wrote on Jul 15, 2008 11:59 AM:

" Fine, then cut him loose. At least give him that courtesy after 17 years as the face of the franchise. "

packer backer wrote on Jul 15, 2008 10:29 AM:

" I bleed green but I agree with the Packers. Oh by the way Rogers your are number one guy now. Hmmm 4 months later, Oh hear comes Brett hit the showers Aaron, thanks but no thanks? So how long does Rogers wait, until Farve decides to retire next week, next month, 3 years from now? Sure Farve gave us 17 years of great times, but if he wants to come back, he needs to earn it. He took the silver platter when HE left the team in March! "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
The Chronicle
Holmen Courier
Houston County News
Onalaska Life
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.