Gabeofthebluffs wrote on Jul 28, 2008 2:50 PM:
" http://kapankewatch.blogspot.com/
Interesting "
Too Dang Good wrote on Jul 28, 2008 10:15 AM:
" To BrianGSmith: Where's your proof? Nothing you have said about Bush being AWOL can be substantiated. Dan Rather took a rumor and egregiously ran with it with exponential proportions. "
Johnson Watch wrote on Jul 28, 2008 9:53 AM:
" It is SHAMEFULL that the Tribune published, in the paper, information about Kapanke Watch. Then they REFUSE to publish the same information about Johnson Watch.
That right there shows the bias of the Tribune now doesn't it.
http://johnsonwatch08.blogspot.com/ "
Polewog wrote on Jul 21, 2008 3:22 PM:
" [Sarcasm] Bias? In an editorial? Stop the presses!!! This needs to be investigated!!![/Sarcasm] "
Michael Welch wrote on Jul 21, 2008 12:18 PM:
" The BEST thing that EVER happened to Limbaugh was Bill Clinton -- Clinton allowed Limbaugh to become a real attack dog for the righties and Clinton was 'perfect' for them at first: a liberal Dogpatch loaded with unsophisticated personal corruptions and a smarmy style that invited a punch in the jaw. Unfortunately electing the 'Nuke Gingrinch' congress of 1995 permitted Clinton to don the role of Eliot Ness re: the Repub Contract ON America; that plus Clinton's morphing into Calvin Coolidge as the stocks and bonds Wall Street fave ensured a quasi-liberal more popular, by his end, than Reagan... "
Michael Welch wrote on Jul 21, 2008 12:10 PM:
" O'Reilly once did a 'show' (it is ALL a 'show') with his own satirist Stephen Colbert in which HE in turn satirized Colbert by playing gentle, mild milquetoasty and 'admitting' that the on-the-air tough ol' Bill wasn't the 'real' softie Bill. Yeah he was putting Colbert on as Colbert put him on BUT -- I think there's something to what BO'R was ACTUALLY admitting -- in large part it is just a 'game' of pandering to folks' prejudices, ignorance and desire for collective glory. Pat Buchanan, a bright fellow all in all, used to be the 'first' O'Reilly on '80s talk by forever yelling at the liberal 'patsy,' a Colmes to his Hannity... "
Michael Welch wrote on Jul 21, 2008 12:01 PM:
" When I was a fervent Reaganite (a 'proto-neo-con' you might say) Dick Mial got to know me via those pre-bloggite letters to the editor. (I typed them on a Swiss-made TYPEWRITER waaaaaay back then!) You might even remark that Dick got to know me rather more than he may have wished -- as I rapidly became the 'most regular' of 'regular' contributors for the length of the Reagan prez. A leftie guy I knew at the time once archly observed that I seemed to aspire to be 'La Crosse's George Will,' i. e. I was a 'Willabe.' (I disliked that because it WAS clever -- and accurate.) Limbaugh to me was just gas for the masses though -- 'Megadittos Rush!' and shut up and listen! was the only 'message' RL ever appeared to have... "
Teiresias wrote on Jul 20, 2008 10:24 PM:
" Oh, come on Dick!
I can't believe you're making an error that any first year journalism student would catch.
Bloviators, muck-rakers and blowhards have been around longer than the printing press and people have chosen to blindly follow them.
Part of the mainstream media's job (and that includes the LaCrosse Tribune) is to separate opinion from fact and present it to the public, allowing people to make up their own minds.
Unfortunately the MSM hasn't been living up to its end of the bargain and folks like O'Reilley and others have been given a free pass.
The medium has been so dumbed down and Americans have continued to believe what the anchors say, assuming they are being impartial. Big mistake. "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Jul 20, 2008 6:49 PM:
" Brian, the scales on your eyes are blinding you to your own hypocrisy.
First, I ended my post by agreeing with Mr. Mail's idea, people are picking news that meets their preconcieved ideas and not looking at all of the data, and that is bad.
Second, your irony of saying I'm "Rovian" (apparently meaning something like slanderous) and I "toss out insults and insinuations." Then immediately say "Limbaugh is an extremist....a no good rabble rouser." Pot, meet kettle.
As a side note, I haven't listened to Limbaugh for months (although I used to agree with about 80% of his views). I do have friends and relatives who express their liberal views and I listen. I also visit liberal websites to see their best arguments. If you want to see what ignoring all the data leads to, go to the Democratic Underground website. Truely sad. "
Johnson Watch wrote on Jul 20, 2008 6:07 PM:
" Just to clarify, we are not affiliated with any candidate or political subdivision. We are but a few people who believe the people DO have a right to hear BOTH SIDES. "
BrianGSmith wrote on Jul 20, 2008 5:45 PM:
" Dear "Phil O'Bates"....As vocal a Christian you are on other blogs I find it a bit disappointing you're taking an Editorial attempting to bridge or discuss the left-right divide and failure to listen, etc...to slam the author (Mr. Mial) Why not address his thesis rather go "Rovian" and toss out insults and insinuations? Limbaugh is an extremist....a no good rabble rouser. Most of his followers are frustrated white males who feel they're getting cheated somehow. Limbaugh had his immigrant maid score hill-billy heroine for him on the street and got busted at an airport with another MAN's viagra in his carry-on. Yeah....he's a real patriot. Keep listening to him. "
BrianGSmith wrote on Jul 20, 2008 5:38 PM:
" Dear "Too Dang Good"...Bush didn't show up for his National Guard training. Rather used a fake memo some General retyped because his original memo from Bush's service had "disappeared". However false that modern memo was, the story of Bush hiding behind his Daddy's trousers and getting stoned while his fellow aged Americans were dying in Vietnam, a war he supported, is 100% true. Bush was AWOL. He is a silverspooned slacker and it shows in the results of his labor....the State of the Union is in chaos. "
Johnson Watch wrote on Jul 20, 2008 3:34 PM:
" theskyisfalling
wrote on Jul 20, 2008 1:15 PM:
We agree, the progressive majority made a childish attack. We responded by posting Johnson's record and her supporters. "
Too Dang Good wrote on Jul 20, 2008 1:49 PM:
" If, as Mr. Mial asserts, Bill O'Reilly is a bully, what does that make Keith Olbermann on MSNBC? A tender-hearted progressive? What about the hit piece on Pres. Bush about him allegedly not serving as ordered in the Texas Air National Guard? That story infamously became "Rather-gate". Dan Rather got a slap on the wrist and his producer Mary Mapes was shown the door. To say right-wingers are mean-spirited (while that can be true) without saying the same for the leftists is intellecutally dishonest and one dimensional. "
Common Sense wrote on Jul 20, 2008 1:23 PM:
" BS Bruce, O'Reilly was speculating on possible reasons Hornbeck denied that he was in deed Hornbeck when he had opportunities to be removed from the situation he was in. This was after he had been there for several years. No one says every word O'Reilly, or Colbert, or anyone else ever utters is always gospel. O'Reilly was not saying Hornbeck should have been left there. I'm sure we all, yes, even you BS Bruce, occasionally say something that comes out sounding kind of dumb. "
theskyisfalling wrote on Jul 20, 2008 1:15 PM:
" If you don't agree a website attacking Kapanke is helpful, how is one attacking Johnson going to be any more productive? Isn't it time that we grow up and start acting like adults when it comes to politics? "
Johnson Watch wrote on Jul 20, 2008 12:42 PM:
" Bruce:
We appreciate the compliment. The watch Johnson site SHOULD be predictable, as it is her actual record.
As for it's looks, we stole the design from the other site Mial mentioned. "
damnstraight wrote on Jul 20, 2008 12:42 PM:
" LOL at the reactionary DD and his comments. Talk about a sore loser! Pay attention: Dick isn't saying he's unbiased, he saying we tend not to listen to those we do not like or who have different biases than our own. Here's a test: How many friends do you have with fundamentally different views on the world than yourself? The more people you count as friends with opposite views, the more open minded you are. "
Blue State Bruce wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:51 AM:
" That one about O'Reilly sticking up for victimized children reminded me of the Shawn Hornbeck case.
O'Reilly said:
"The situation here for this kid looks to me to be a lot more fun than what he had under his old parents. He didn't have to go to school. He could run around and do whatever he wanted."
With advocates like Bill.... "
Blue State Bruce wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:44 AM:
" I was just thinking, I don't know anyone with an IQ in the normal range who will admit to believing a word that comes out of O'Reilly's mouth. Some watch him for the entertainment value, sure. Take for example his face-off with Colbert - hilarious! O'Reilly was clueless. YouTube it and see if you don't agree.
Also checked out the anti-Johnson site. FUNNY! Totally predicatable, not very creative. No doubt slapped together quickly. Keep working on it though, I'll check back. "
Blue State Bruce wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:33 AM:
" O'Reilly is a bully. Just ask Andrea Mackris.
Where's Dan today? Maybe at the Loggers game. Maybe at Dippin' Dots? Maybe forcing people to join the GOP to see their own President in their own public park? Who knows? "
Johnson Watch wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:17 AM:
" The Johnson Watch site is UP.
http://johnsonwatch08.blogspot.com/
Mr. Mial, please publish us in you bext editorial, otherwise your bias will definately show. "
Common Sense wrote on Jul 20, 2008 10:11 AM:
" I guess we know who wears the pants in the Mial family. If you watched Mr O'Reilly more often, you would find that he is pretty much unbiased. He is an avid advocate for victimized children and wants the stiffest penalties possible for those who prey on them. He is for personal responsibility, and, in my opinion, is a little soft on some of things liberals do. Maybe if Mr Mial sneaked off and watched him more often, he would know those things. Perhaps a TV in the garage.... "
wiseup wrote on Jul 20, 2008 9:52 AM:
" OUR newspaper is the MOST biased/hypocrite newspaper I have ever read! From the front page to the sports sections, the reporters print their slant on all the issues. Anti-smoking, anti-alcohol, anti-automobile,anti-small business, anti-veteran, ALL the while accepting money to promote the same products they just bashed! Why is YOUR circulation/stock price crashing? Same reason people are turning off the 3 main TV stations! We are tired of YOUR liberal bias, we want the facts and let us make up our own minds! "
tax-me-more wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:30 AM:
" We found it. With NO way the VERIFY the source, Mr. Mial should NEVER have gone to press. We are in the process of setting up the anti-Johnson site already. We will let Mr. Mial know when it is up and running, and we EXPECT to be published FREE OF CHARGE, just like the anti Kapanke site was. "
just the facts wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:29 AM:
" Your wife 'caught you'? She called you an "evil doer"? Obviously you have a rigid method of deciding issues, so this was out of the ordinary, for you to consider a conservative point of view! And the Tribune tries to pass you off as an , OBJECTIVE, journalist? We need change! Your mean spirited comment about the letter writer who had the gall, to state the facts about Obama tells it all. No wonder your readers lean toward right wing radio. We get the facts there , not the facts as thr Trib interpruts them! "
tax-me-more wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:22 AM:
" First Mr. Mial, we are certain there are a lot of your readers who were unaware of the ANTI Kapanke site. Question: Once the anti Johnson site is up and running, will you give it FREE publicity as well? If not, then the Tribune would be guilty of giving one candidate more time/press/coverage than the other.
It is also interesting that as of the time of this posting, a google search for "Kapanke Watch" did NOT bring up the site. Who informed you of the site? You have our PM Mr. Mial, send us the URL, and forward us the original email/document you received informing you of the site, we will do the investigative work you should have done, and WE WILL inform the public as to who is behind this smear campaign! "
Phil O'Bates wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:13 AM:
" Richard, you point out some of the sad state of politics today.
I found it funny though, that you said your wife "caught" you watching Bill O, and that you thought that the 4 main news organizations used to be fair and straight forward. It's because the main stream press was so biased that people like Limbaugh became so popular. Limbaugh exsposed the truth that the main stream media was trying to hide.
The main stream press is the dinosaur media now. Most people get their news on-line, and I don't mean the Lacrosse Tribune online.
You are right though about people avoiding news that doesn't fit their preconcieved ideas of what is right. Ultimately, that is bad. "