Click here to view La Crosse Area Weather
Home > Sports > Story
 Advertisement 

SECTION SPONSORS


Published - Wednesday, July 30, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (46 comment(s))

Favre files papers


.
GREEN BAY — Brett Favre’s decision to file for reinstatement will force the Green Bay Packers to do one of three things: release him, trade him, or allow him to report to camp.

If he reports, it potentially could cause a major distraction for a team that committed to moving on after he retired in March.
Fans hold up signs to bring back Brett Favre at football training camp Tuesday, July 29, 2008, in Green Bay, Wis. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)

NFL spokesman Randall Liu confirmed that Favre sent his reinstatement paperwork to the NFL offices Tuesday. He now is awaiting approval from commissioner Roger Goodell, a step that is considered a formality, but wouldn’t be forthcoming until today at the earliest.

Once Favre is reinstated, the Packers will have 24 hours to decide what to do with him.

“That’s obviously the first step in Brett coming back, so we’ll deal with that when he is reinstated and we’ll definitely have a plan in order,” Packers coach Mike McCarthy said after practice Tuesday afternoon.

ESPN first reported that Favre faxed the letter earlier Tuesday.

If Goodell reinstates Favre on Wednesday, his return to the practice field for the Packers could come Friday. The Packers practice twice Wednesday but can wait a day to put Favre back on their active roster. The team does not have a scheduled public practice Thursday.

Throughout Favre’s latest round of flip-flopping on his football future, Packers officials have said that Favre had the option of rejoining the team — but Aaron Rodgers would be the starter.

“Brett Favre is still a very good football player,” McCarthy said Tuesday. “He is an asset to our football team. Once again, I’m going to answer this question for the last time. The plan for Brett Favre will be discussed with Brett Favre first, and then we’ll make it aware to the public.”

McCarthy also said Rodgers will start all of the preseason games and probably get more playing time than Favre used to in the preseason.

“He’ll be starting all of the games as the starter,” McCarthy said of Rodgers. “We’ve talked about possibly playing our first group maybe a little longer, and those are things that we’ll discuss. The health of your football team obviously factors into that, so that is our plan going into the preseason with Aaron.”

Rodgers insisted he isn’t bothered by the potential of having Favre lurking over his shoulder.

“You know, I’m not as affected as you guys (the media) think I am or should be,” Rodgers said. “They told me I’m the starter, and until that changes, that’s going to be my focus.”

Rodgers said he is confident in his abilities and the firm commitment he has received from Packers coaches.

“I’ve been empowered as the starting quarterback and until that changes, I’ll say it again, that’s going to be my focus,” Rodgers said.

Rodgers said he and Favre have “never had a problem” and would probably “joke around” when they saw each other again.

“We’ve got a great relationship,” Rodgers said. “If he’s here, we’ll welcome him back.”

But some Packers players seemed skeptical that Favre would remain the backup if he ended up reporting to camp and wasn’t traded away.

“I don’t know about that,” wide receiver Donald Driver said. “But we’ll see. We’ll see what happens.”

Cornerback Charles Woodson — who chanted “We want Brett!” as he left the practice field Tuesday, but later laughed it off as “just having a little fun” with reporters — seemed to think Favre could play his way into the position.

“Who knows how Brett feels about that — if he’s coming in as being the backup, or coming in and a potential trade is going to happen, I don’t know,” Woodson said. “But if he comes in as the backup, he just comes in and plays the way he knows how to play. And if it’s better, then the organization has another decision to make.”

But Woodson said players aren’t taking sides.

“There’s no reason for anyone in the locker room to take sides or say in the media they prefer one guy over the other,” Woodson said. “It’s A-Rod’s job, and at this point, it’s his job to keep.”

McCarthy said Favre’s presence wouldn’t become a distraction.

“I’m not concerned about it,” McCarthy said. “We have talked about it as a football team. The players are handling it totally different than I think the perception is out there. We’re about playing football. We’re about getting ready for our season upcoming. Everybody is aware of everything that is going on. There are no ill feelings toward Brett Favre, and he will be welcomed back into our locker room.”

Of course, it won’t come to that if the Packers can work out a trade deemed acceptable to Favre in the next few days.

The Packers have no plans to grant Favre the release he has requested, suspecting that he would immediately sign with division rival Minnesota; the Packers have filed tampering charges against the Vikings.

The team owns Favre’s rights until his contract expires after the 2010 season, making a trade the most likely outcome acceptable to both Favre and the Packers.

But maybe not for some of his old teammates.

“He would look ugly in any other uniform, plain and simple,” Driver said. “Every guy that leaves here and gets another uniform, that’s what I tell them: They look ugly.”
.



 Advertisement 
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 31, 2008 8:22 AM:

" "dill pickles": Seriously, so supporting Favre returning to the Pack, and giving the Packers the BEST CHANCE TO WIN is Anti-Packer? What, did the winning ways that Favre brought in the '90s and 2000+ keep you awake on Sundays, or are you just more comfortable with our losing seasons of the '80s? I would say pushing for the BEST TEAM Possible on the field and WINNING is VERY Packer...and I will take my Favre Shrine over your molding shrine to pickles any day... "

dullard wrote on Jul 31, 2008 7:28 AM:

" Pack, go ahead and just change your name to FavreAttack2020. For some reason you think the Packers should just make HIM the Genereal Manager and coach. The Packers have moved on. It's time to put out the candles on that shrine in your bedroom closet. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 31, 2008 6:53 AM:

" Attention everyone: we would like to present "donut", please, no mention of the correlation to his IQ. "donut" has just earned his "packer fan since the 1950's" lapel pin. With the lapel pin "donut" will assume that he knows more than everyone else and sees all (to honor his fandom, we will let him pretend for the next 30 seconds). donut, your 30 second imaginary superiority is over, back to reality: Favre gave us all the best day of the week for 16 years, so HE deserved the benefit of the doubt. Favre gives THIS team the BEST CHANCE TO WIN THIS YEAR. Thompson is after his own legend, and talk about playing people. Aaron Rodgers is FRAGILE. Any Questions? "

donut wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:18 PM:

" maybe we should keep Favre until that promising freshman in Holmen is ready "

donut wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:05 PM:

" How many of you so called Packer fans would trade a first or second round draft pick for a 38 year old quarterback that would give you a thril and then lose a game. Favre is gone and I hope he never comes back. Of course he will be a hall of famer and deserves it, but quit listening to ESPN and get over it.yz5at "

sass wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:04 PM:

" You know, this Favre thing is really getting old. He did his thing in the past and he was good, much, but not all of the time. It is time to move on. Favre appears to be suffering from what seems to be normal when someone moves on or retires, sentimentality for the past and a feeling of loss...but the fact is, he needs to deal with it himself and not drag the team he once cared for, down. ...And it is a shame he's destroying the respect many had for him. "

donut wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:57 PM:

" I have loyalty to the Packers not just one person. Brett Favre is playing you like a fiddle. And like I said a Packer fan since the 1950's. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:52 PM:

" donut is a viking fan trying to change the PACKER FAN support for Favre, so, as he hopes, Favre will come to save his pathetic purple team. Hey donut...GO PACK GO....BRING BACK FAVRE....GO PACK GO....BRING BACK FAVRE....GO PACK GO....BRING BACK FAVRE....GO PACK GO....BRING BACK FAVRE....ps...How many Sundays/Mondays did Favre give you the best day of the week donut? and this is how YOU repay him? Packer Fans are loyal....donut, you got no loyalty.... "

donut wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:51 PM:

" Favre won one Superbowl and lost one, Bart Starr won two Superbowls and other championships. Who was the better quarterback? "

donut wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:44 PM:

" Hey anon, Favre lost the championship game for throwing one of his infamous interceptions. I am a Packer fan and have been since the 1950's. No Player is bigger than the team. Maybe you want to go back to the years before Thompson and feel good about the Mike Sherman years. None of you supporting Favre are Packers fans you are just following the local and national media and the Favre Propaganda machine. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:38 PM:

" Here's something interesting: Vikings' Tapeh happy to be home...this article has NO COMMENTS...yet it has been posted all day...most of the other VIKE articles are without posts also, yet the viking fans seem to find the Packers more interesting than their vikings.....hmmmmm......could they just be jealous Packer fan wannabes?....trying in their akward way to be part of the Pack? "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:33 PM:

" dillard: DOME team is to WARM WEATHER team as is Apples to Oranges....except the second two are fruits...just like you. In regard to Favre "getting out of his contract"...had HE wanted to finalize his plans with the Pack, he would have signed his papers on the spot at his retirement press conference....don't you think "dill"? Even YOU can get that one... Here's a project for you "dill pickles": find out what the AVERAGE QB rating is in Conference Title Games, and then find out what THE AVERAGE QB RATING is in GAMES BELOW 10 degrees...my bet is that Favre has outperformed both of those numbers in that Giants game.....think you can find the data? Go Dill Pickle GO!!! "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 3:16 PM:

" Objectively you're right. Realistically, Fevre is a selfish a--hole. "

Anon writer wrote on Jul 30, 2008 3:03 PM:

" Anyone taking an objective look at both Rodgers and Favre would have to agree that Favre is the better of the two, and gives the Packers a better chance to get to the SB. Why Thompson and the rest of his kool-aid drinkers can't see that is beyond me.

Favre is a 17 year veteran and 2007 all-pro who took his team to the NFC championship. Rodgers is...well...he might be a good clipboard holder, but he's not qualified to carry Favre's jockstrap. "

Anon writer wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:58 PM:

" Stating"...how obvious it was in those cold games that he has lost his heart", all the while totally ignoring a 137+ QB rating isn't very persuasive at all. I saw the look on his face, and he was having a great time! "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:48 PM:

" Last I checked Lambeau was pretty cold and the Metrodome was covered, smart-guy. Face facts, man. Favre did all of this to himself. If he didn't like Thompson he picked a stupid-a$$ strategy to get out of his contract. I know I'm talking bad about your boyfriend, but you just have to realize that he doesn't love you anymore. It's not yu, it's him. "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:39 PM:

" Thirdly, justifying his heart by touting his awesome 70.7 QB rating isn't very persuasive. I saw the look on his face and it looked like he was searching for the nearest exit. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:38 PM:

" Dullard: or shall we say DEAF AND DUMB...have you NOT been paying attention? Favre NOW wants to go to the VIKINGS and who blames him now...Soldiers Field is the ONLY cold weather stadium on their schedule this year...warm weather team...please. Here's logic: Thompson, because he didn't WANT Favre to OFFICIALLY retire, was able to place Favre on the "retired/inactive" list, allowing him to insert HIS prized pick AND still prevent Favre from going to the Vikings. Here's a guarantee: Favre and Thompson's POOR RELATIONSHIP started WELL BEFORE this retirement issue. One day, maybe Favre will open up about what REALLY went on with Thompson. YOU will probably dismiss THAT TOO... "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:25 PM:

" First, to defend my logic. The more time these young guys spend playing together, the more chemistry they can build. The only thing to stop that from happening is Favre.
Secondly, I have a question. Is Favre a child or an idiot, or both? If he didn't want to retire, he didn't have to. Is he such a pansy that he had to buckle under the "pressure" put on him by Thompson? He knew what he was doing and is still trying to do it. He thought he could hold the team hostage and get his release to sign with a warm weather team (Tampa) bacause he doesn't want to play in the cold anymore. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:20 PM:

" Anon...AND if you look at the stats from the Conference Championship, Favre WAS our offense. The "balanced attack" that McCarthy touted got tossed by the wayside in a panic. We gained 28 yards...on 14 attempts with our running game. Without Favre's performance for the prior 3.8 quarters, we wouldn't have been close enough for the final pass to have even mattered. Let's face it, there are just people out there that have dreamed of success but that have never even come close, and some of those people are haters due to their small minds, hearts, and drive. They will sit and WAIT for an imperfection to be seen and then they will make noise. Favre gives us the best chance THIS YEAR...Aaron...well, he's fragile. "

kbg23 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:17 PM:

" RE: dullard
What I remember from that cold game last year is yes, that interception thrown by Favre but also misssed field goals, blown defensive coverage (could Al Harris possibly have looked worse) and the unabilty to run. Not just one throw. What I remember from the begining of the season is 300+ yard games from Favre, the o-line and recievers without any help from the running game. He played a large role in our successes and failures last year. Thats why its a team game. "

Anon writer wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:04 PM:

" In response to all those who think Favre lost his heart in the cold games last year... Favre's QB rating for the Seattle snow game was 137.6, the best of ANY QB on divisonal playoff weekend. Against the Giants, it was 70.7. Big difference yes. However, Manning's rating was only 72.0 and Tom Brady's rating for the AFC Championship game? It was 66.4. "

Anon writer wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:42 PM:

" dullard: I don't understand your logic. you say if Favre plays one more year and the Packers will be good one year and suck for the next ten, but if Rodgers plays this year they will have growing pains but will be good for the next decade. If Rodgers is so good, why would another one (or two) years make a difference? I say trade Rodgers (won't most teams want to be good for the next decade?) and let Brohm learn behind Favre for a year or two. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:40 PM:

" Dullard: great name by the way...very defining. Look at what has happened: the General MANAGER is responsible for personnel moves, and as the GM Thompson is responsible for the process of personnel moves. Thompson is either an idiot for NOT having Favre sign his papers prior to HOSTING a retirement press conference or it is part of his plan. Had Favre, after being pressured by Thompson, signed his papers and OFFICIALLY RETIRED, he could go anywhere he wants to play right now, and Thompson risks letting the best QB in NFL history leave the Pack. By NOT signing the papers, Favre is at Thompson's mercy, and Thompson can install his PRIZE PICK. Do you really think it's JUST dumb luck for Thompson? "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:25 PM:

" PackAttack2020,
How can you even begin to say that this is Thompson's fault? FAVRE retired in March, then a week later he changed his mind and the team welcomed him back. Then FAVRE retired again two days later. How can he think that the team is just going to take that crap forever? Favre is an unreliable, selfish flake who cannot be counted on anymore. Oh yeah, and let me say again... he looked like he wanted to cry and go home in the playoffs last year. "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:18 PM:

" by the way....JP YOURE AN IDIOT.....maybe a MORON...definitely one of the two....maybe both.............that's it.....MORONIC IDIOT "

PackAttack2020 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:15 PM:

" Thompson has played this to HIS FULL ADVANTAGE: he wants a team that HE built, and Brett Favre stood in his way. Thompson wants a winner, but it must be a winner that has no ties other than him. Aaron Rodgers is Thompson's signature draft pick. The team and the fans are going to pay for this egotistical, self-promoting GM. Thompson, knowing Favre would most likely decide to come back, pressured Favre, and he decided to avoid having Favre sign his retirement papers thus giving Thompson FULL CONTROL over Favre's services. PATHETIC way to trea a LEGEND! BRING BACK FAVRE BRING BACK FAVRE!! "

Sadiedog62 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:59 PM:

" " I can't believe how everyone is beating Favre up for making a decison he regrets. Haven't we all done that? I know I have. He deserves more respect than that. He was a role model the entire time he represented us.
What about Mark Martin, no one is beating him up for not retiring as he said he was going to?
Give Favre a break and let Rodgers go, and let the younger Brohm get ready for when Brett really retires. " "

JPSieloff wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:47 PM:

" Brett Favre: Another example of a boy trying to grow up without a father present now in his life. "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:39 PM:

" kbg,
I guess we just have different motivations. I'd rather see a competitive team for years to come than watch the Packers almost make it one more year and then stink for ten years. Let's face it, the Packers praobably aren't going to the Super Bowl either way, but they're definitely not going with Favre who, if you remember, crumbled into a pathetic mess in the cold at the end of last year. Everyone wants to remember Favre's heroics last year, but for some reason no one remembers how obvious it was in those cold games that he has lost his heart. "

packer backer wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:01 PM:

" I'm with you D. Ray. The longer this thing goes it won't matter who is QB. All it is, a distraction to everyone in that camp. I wonder what was said behind closed doors? There seems to be a lot of hate going on for a guy that wants to come back and play. Murphy goes and is talking to Brett as we speak to stay home. He is not going away. Either trade him today or put a Green Bay helmet on him by Friday. (Packers don't have practice on Thursday) Kiss and make-up and play some football already! "

kbg23 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:54 AM:

" Unless you have the quarterbacks compete at practice, Thompson and McCarthy and the entire Packer organization cannot tell Packer fans that this is their best chance to win. The NFL is not about four years from now, Thompson has been "building" since he got here and for what? We were one play away from a Super Bowl appearance - why not make a run at that again and worry about the future later? The only issue is, Rodgers is Thompson's golden boy and he would never admit that Favre would beat him in practice. Stick it to them Brett. "

D. Ray wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:46 AM:

" The longer this story goes on the easier it is to say, "Who cares?" Let's get this distraction out of the way and get on with the season. Let's use this wasted ink to cover the Brewers instead! "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:47 AM:

" Anon, the Packers have good young team. They need to develop a young QB so they can grow together in the coming years. With one more year of Favre, they might be good for one more year, but then they'll SUCK for the next ten. I'd rather feel some growing pains for a year and then be good for the next decade. Anyone who wants Favre back is just being sentimental toward someone who has shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that he doesn't care about anyone but himself. Probably the same people "

Anon writer wrote on Jul 30, 2008 10:24 AM:

" McCarthy and Thompson are making a mistake...even given all of Favre's antics and flip-flopping. When Favre steps on the practice field, he will be the best QB on the Packer roster. McCarthy and Thompson are set on going with a QB that has basically no experience vs. going with the QB that took the team to the NFC Championship last year and is generally coonsidered to be one of the top 5 or so QBs in the entire NFL. "

CJ wrote on Jul 30, 2008 9:43 AM:

" Crybaby of the year #4 "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 9:27 AM:

" sillyme, how can you say that Favre is a team player. A team player wouldn't retire and then change his mind and then retire again all inside of a week. He's doing his best to make sure that his "team" cannot move forward without him. That is the definition of selfish. I hope they don't trade him or release him. I hope they tell him that if he is to return to the NFL he's going to sit on the bench. This selfish little baby deserves a timeout. "

R A wrote on Jul 30, 2008 9:19 AM:

" Release Him, if they don't want him, let him go someplace else, he wants to play football. Men have to PLAY you know, that's just the way it is!! "

jn wrote on Jul 30, 2008 9:06 AM:

" To Sillyme..
Brett is getting pretty old and bones are getting brittle. Aaron did not have many injuries is college..give him a chance. He'll heal quicker than Brett. "

slinger1919 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:50 AM:

" The Packers have to resolve this matter as soon as possible one way or the other like yesterday all ready! With the circumstances hanging over everyone's head is doing no one any good at all. Then everyone will know what direction they're heading and everyone can move forward! "

sillyme wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:38 AM:

" BRING BACK FAVRE!!!! Are the Packers stupid? Rodgers will be hurt in the first couple of games anyway!! Besides, Rodgers is not the team player that Farve is, Rodgers is only about himself. THE PACKERS NEED FAVRE SO DO THE FANS!!!! "

sfbailey wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:09 AM:

" Favre is the greatest paper filer ever...everyone knows that. The only thing he does better is throwing interceptions. "

dullard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:07 AM:

" That's a nice thought, bluebunny, but Favre won't has already said that he will not come back unless he starts or gets to compete for the starting job. McCarthy said that Rodgers is starting no matter what. Another year of Favre would stunt the growth of a young team. I think the Packers are doing the right thing. "

bluebunny wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:09 AM:

" Why wouldn't you want Brett Favre on the team, regardless of his role? Aaron Rodgers will see more play time in the 1st preseason game than he has in 4 years, and he'll probably have to leave the game b/c of an injury. Who do we have to fill in? Brett Favre or one of the rookies? Not a tough choice. "

jn wrote on Jul 30, 2008 6:49 AM:

" Maybe he bring water or Gatorade to the other players. "

GOD_HIMSELF wrote on Jul 30, 2008 6:47 AM:

" sweet, the packers are going to have a solid back up at QB, and pre-season games will be worth watching past the first quarter. let him ride the pine. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the La Crosse Tribune.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The LaCrosse Tribune, please sign in now!
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The LaCrosse Tribune requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

NEWSPAPER ADS

LACROSSE JOBS

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 
 
Dailies
La Crosse Tribune
Winona Daily News

Weeklies
Coulee News
Courier Life News
The Chronicle
Houston County News
Tomah Journal
Vernon Broadcaster
Westby Times

Regional
Inside Preps
My LIVE! Entertainment
Best of River Valley
Business Report
Healthy Living Today
Strictly Golf
River Valley Bike Trails
River Valley Blogs
River Valley Outdoors

Shoppers
Tri-County Foxxy

Marketplace
Newspaper Ads
Local Website Directory
7 Rivers Rentals
HomeSeller
Wheels Website
Outdoor Motors
Work For You

Portals
La Crosse NET
Winona NET

Classifieds
River Valley Classifieds

Links
Lee Enterprises

About Us | Classifieds | Contact Us | Terms of Use | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | Search | RSS | Videos | Advertiser Directory | Add to My Yahoo!
Copyright © 1997 - 2008 The La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.