EMSDOC wrote on Aug 17, 2008 6:33 PM:
" You cant have a paramedic first response program without an ambulance, Cleveland said.
Johnsrud countered that physicians should be advisors but shouldnt carry a vote on the commission, which would set standards and protocol.
People of knowledge shouldnt be the decision-makers on the body, he said.
Are these real quotes? Would they really say things this idiotic? Clearly Chief Cleveland hasn't been indoctrinated into the "paramedic engine" model.
And physicians not having a vote? I personally have a degree in EMS Management with 22 years of experience as a paramedic and am now an EMS Medical Director. Who do you think would be better qualified in making decisions regarding the EMS system? "
tower wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:08 PM:
" Moderate, as usual Nestor has traveled off into the jungle. I don't plan on answering him when he starts down the Yellow Brick Rd. Keep to the point or post on another site. He is the usual loudmouth I know everything this town constantly spawns. Milo Knutson was one also. He about wrecked this town when he was mayor. Nestor couldn't find his butt with either hand. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:55 PM:
" You better be careful Tower. Otherwise, Nestor will do everything in his power to find out who you really are. And then he will do everything in his power to try a make your life miserable. What a putz! "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 11, 2008 9:45 AM:
" Nestor - take your medicine. It will relieve your pain and result in you being less cranky. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:38 AM:
" Then there are those that would like to differentiate and ignore land for a dollar on a 27 year TIF while literally harping on City owned land that we are reaping $27k in rent each year, and tens of thousands in content tax? Explain that one to me? Whats the problem they made it 'without' taxpayer creative financing????? "
Myturn wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:36 AM:
" wiseup- You could not be more incorrect! Let's start with property tax. Then we might as well use the "campgrounds" as an example. First, there is something in this town that I am aware of as well, it is called contents tax. Equipment, goods, stock etc. You know, we have a 3 year plus scrutiny and $35k Audit ongoing with the "campgrounds" and we are torturing this guy. As the Logger's rent has been 20% of his, and he has been scrutinized because he has been successful. Case in point, we have sold land for a dollar to help a 'landlord' proselytize tenants/commerce from the area, sidestepped reaping that property tax as it goes to pay for preparing the site and infrastructure. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:57 AM:
" 8/4/08
From: Fire Chief Greg Cleveland
To: Steve Gores, Mayor Johnsrud, Andrea Richmond
The Wisconsin Tax Payers Alliance does a nice job of summarizing expenditures for local government services; however, there is always the disclaimer which most people pay little attention to. The disclaimer speaks about how communities do not list their expenditures in the same format or account for them in the same manner. For example some Wisconsin cities do not place their personnel expenditures in the individual department. They reflect these expenditures in the in another general services budget this understating the cost of the department/services. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:56 AM:
" Although when those numbers are turned into Pfaff you might as well just throw them in a grocery bag with the rest of the City financial numbers. He has no idea, and is incapable of any true numbers deriving from his office. Sadly Chief Cleveland was correct when he inadvertently stepped on himself reaching for an excuse to answer CRG's Gore assertions. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:50 AM:
" Oldglorydays- You are a pip. The Center makes money? Center officials made grandiose statements of profit years when the used car salesman and his mute Center Board partner were in town. In fact they had a vast majority run of losing money during those years. How nice to punch out profitable P&L statements with limping bookwork and ledgers missing infusion of taxpayer funds for buidling, additions, and remodeling. Not mentioning the cost of the money if it were the private sector. I went over and took the time and reviewed the Center books, they do a good job in house. "
oldglorydays wrote on Aug 10, 2008 11:26 PM:
" wiseup - You forgot the airport, which makes money and the La Crosse Center, which makes money most years. The properties you mentioned don't pay property taxes because they are owned by the city, but if they are leased, the city does make money. And the city also is paid personal property taxes on the equipment owned by the lessee. "
wiseup wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:11 PM:
" P.S. MANY of the city owned properties I mentioned ALSO SERVE ALCOHOL!!!!!!!!!! "
wiseup wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:09 PM:
" This city already owns a golf course, campgrounds, bath houses, marinas, ball parks, transit centers, LaCrosse Center, parking ramps, tennis courts, swimming pools, Pump House, museums etc etc. They all have in common~ NONE pay PROPERTY TAX and NONE make ANY money! Now they want to get involved in ambulance service at a profit? NO SANE PERSON CAN BELIEVE IT! "
Myturn wrote on Aug 10, 2008 9:13 PM:
" Tower, I would have to state you have indeed stuck your foot in the bucket. You are an 'insider' or at the very least a political pal. Doyle, the 'Slam Dunk' Mayor, and those who follow them have now been slowed down on 'fast tracking' this Plan. Reflected on the Tribunes Editorial that was squeezed out by a seldom seen collective pool of integrity over at the Paper. It could possibly be the death nail for yet another 'emergency' bit of business at City Council. Giving outside the loop onlookers time to gather their own statistics, and most importantly scrutinize what we have been privy one sidedly to already. The brake lever seems to have been pulled, Thank Goodness, it is how our System is supposed to work. Not gathering the needed papers and running down the Council aisles for vote. "
dfib wrote on Aug 10, 2008 1:07 PM:
" Tower- Also not beating the point, but having been involved with multiple medical directors in multiple systems I would say Dr. Voter is far and away the best medical director I have ever worked with. He was one of the reasons I came to La Crosse! I know it's subjective, but how can one objectively rate a medical director? "
tower wrote on Aug 10, 2008 12:30 PM:
" hoponpop, not to beat this but who says Dr. Voter is a leading Medical Director? He may be and nothing against the man but don't make statements without some back up. There is too much of that in the discussion. Who says TSA is providing excellent care or the FD is the best? I want to hear it from a neutral party not running the system or wanting to. You are right in the FD runs of his license but he still has a dog in the fight through his employer. "
hoponpop wrote on Aug 10, 2008 12:20 PM:
" Further interesting fact: LCFD is recognized by the state as First Responders (under Dr. Voter's MD License). The only reason they get to practice EMT level care is because Tri-State allows them to do so under their provider license (which is again under Dr. Voter's MD License). Dr. Voter is recognized as a leading Medical Director, and give his people some great tools to ensure the best pt. outcome. LCFD needs to be careful about biting the hand that pets them. "
tower wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:56 AM:
" Defib, I agree FSH has been neutral. I did not mean to suggest they are not. But they have not been on TSA side either. They have repeatedly let it be known they only care that their patients in the whole county get the same care as everyone else. I don't disagree with that. I would point out that one system does not just mean one provider. Dane Co has one system and multiple providers. It seems to work for them. "
tower wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:51 AM:
" Medic, rumors are just that, unfounded tales. I don't know of any FSH person told to shut up. I have friends there and they didn't get a phone call or email or anything to come speak. I have other friends at GL who were asked to come and speak for TSA. My point was and is that GL has a stake in this and are not neutral. I also don't believe GL has not put money in TSA, Matt even said they get money from Mom and Dad. Big ticket items I doubt are bought by TSA only. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:30 AM:
" Nestor says - "Don't you two have any thing better to do rather than attack the messenger who is critical of the City Administration train wreck. " If that was the sole recepient of your attacks, I would support you. However, anybody that can read can clearly see that siomply isn't the case. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 10, 2008 8:46 AM:
" God knows being nice to people is a terrible thing. Why would anyone want to waste their time on something like that. "
dfib wrote on Aug 10, 2008 6:50 AM:
" You are correct about the major players and it should come at no surprise. Mayor/Chief on one side, TSA/GL on the other. FSMC has been mostly silent. GL has actually been relatively silent on the matter. The ones from GL to speak are mostly affiliated with TSA directly.
I would argue about Dr. Voter having any "agenda". He represents TSA/LCFD/several other local first responder agencies as the medical director. He's been doing so since before 2002 when the whole issue started. "
dfib wrote on Aug 10, 2008 6:40 AM:
" Tower- Look closer at the website. You must have missed the FSMC press release stating they have no agreement with the county/city. A direct contradiction to the one of the slides in the proposal presented Wednesday night.
Physicians on the commission vs subcommittee could go either way. I am more concerned that the elected officials making up the committee (at least some of them) have already shown a blatant disregard for the expertise of the medical community. If the physicians were voting members it would help balance this problem. "
medic193 wrote on Aug 10, 2008 12:48 AM:
" Interesting that you'd bring that up tower. Rumor has it that FSMC prohibited at least one employee from speaking in favor of TSA. Maybe they have a conflict too? "
tower wrote on Aug 9, 2008 10:24 PM:
" Sorry defib, typo, what I meant to say is I can't agree. "
tower wrote on Aug 9, 2008 10:23 PM:
" defib, saw your website. Also read your comment about the commission makeup. Sorry, can agree. Being a MD doesn't make you an expert on EMS.
You know what you call a MD at an accident site?
An IV pole. I still think a sub committee of MDs is fine with the power to regulate medical matters. Also, I find interesting that the people that are leaders in this are all related to GL or TSA. Maybe Dr. Voter has a conflict? Maybe GL has a conflict? I found it interesting that no one from FSH, except Dr. Nesse, spoke the other night or has released any public comment. "
dfib wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:41 PM:
" Anon- glad you made it out from under the mayor's desk long enough to get your quip in. Feel free to stop back with meaningful input. ;) "
anon wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:30 PM:
" I wanted a laugh so I came here to see you same clowns still blogging about this. You keep saying the same things over and over....even past articles you keep saying the same thing. Get over it. What ever happens will happen and there is nothing any of us can do. "
tower wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:32 PM:
" Nestor, I got nothing else to do but screw with your head. I'm retired. "
dfib wrote on Aug 9, 2008 4:38 PM:
" www.nocityambulance.com - Click on "guest commentary". "
Myturn wrote on Aug 9, 2008 4:36 PM:
" Add to that money literally thrown into City slush funds never to be seen or spoken about again, and when asked they have no idea? Yeah I am the one out on the edge here, sure I am? This bunch are management nightmares riding by the seat of their pants. By the way which one of you are 'On Too Many Boards'? The question rally is, Don't you two have any thing better to do rather than attack the messenger who is critical of the City Administration train wreck. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 9, 2008 4:34 PM:
" Tower- I spoke to a Mayor yesterday who is a Fireman, and a Paramedic. His opinion on the City and Fire Department was concise well thought out, full of experience, and backed with little known facts. You will hear it soon. It differs greatly from the Johnsrud camp mantra. My opinion? They have no business entering the ambulance business with terribly high pay/benefits scales, a two day work week, atrociuos Financial Department, and a Public Works Board that approves buildings after they are up,and has no idea how to follow up on contractual mandates specifically handed to them in various different projects. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 9, 2008 4:20 PM:
" It is really quite simple. If two people file for the election for the 2nd District I will gladly bow out. Like I want to sit and be nice to self serving fellows like you two. Also, I will remind you again we will be hearing a wave of information coming, other than the garp being spewed by self serving bureaucrats, Fireman, and their bosses. Distaste for Doyle, you bet I do, but this is about this man attempting to place three hats on at once, expect us to buy it, and come out of closed door meetings after a year, and vote for it. Do you really believe I get flustered from a couple of people like you, or feel any heat? I think not. "
oldglorydays wrote on Aug 9, 2008 12:49 PM:
" Moderate - You give Nestor too much credit. He has a personal vendetta against Doyle, so anything he is involved in is subject to attack. He takes everything personally and is basically angry about just about everything involving the public sector. These are just the latest issues for him to rant about on the blogs. "
tower wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:55 AM:
" Moderate, you have hit the nail on the head. I also realize this discussion is academic as there is very little chance it will come up in 5 weeks. Having dealt with both the city and the county I can say both could screw up a two person parade.
But what the heck, we can pass the time. Too bad most other people have moved on. "
dfib wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:56 AM:
" Tower- The only problem I have with 2 citizens is how they will be chosen. If they are volunteering for the position it is difficult for me to believe they don't have some "agenda". If they are chosen by the commission they could be puppets or mouth pieces. Maybe they should be drawn from a list similar to jury duty and offered the chance to serve? Open to thoughts... "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:51 AM:
" What Nestor is trying to do is to get himself some publicity so that he can obtain some name recognition" prior to his run for the 2nd District Council Seat in the spring. And he doesnt care if he wastes the taxpayers money on a referendum, because it is free advertising for him. Its always been my experience that anyone who is so obsessed with other people having ulterior motives as a basis for their actions, almost always have an ulterior motive for their actions. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:50 AM:
" Regardless of MyTurn's opinion, it is unlikely that this will be "voted on" during the September cycle of the City Council proceedings. What most likely will happen is that they will put it in a "holding pattern for 60 or more likely 90 days. Personally, I doubt it will get passed once it does come to an "up or down" vote, but by putting it off until December they hope that the weather will be bad and people wont want to venture out to express their opposition. "
tower wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:05 AM:
" defib
Now we are talking. I would also add two members of the general public (with no connection to the hospitals, first responder units, TSA, FD, or etc)
Also they must be county citizens. I also could see a sub committee of MDs that have the power over practices, standards, etc without input to statistics, money etc. I just don't want this committee bogged down in minute crap. It should have the big view.
My Turn:
Pull your alum hat off and give us what you would do without the huff and puff. You still have not said what you would do and just given us the view of Planet Kripton "
dfib wrote on Aug 8, 2008 10:13 PM:
" Tower- Excellent point!
However we need a balance. My suggestion would be 2 physicians (1GL/1FS), 2 medical business people (1GL/1FS), Rep from Onalaska, La Crosse, one for the other towns, one for the villages, and possibly one from county health department. Basically 4 politicians, 2 med business representatives, 2 physicians, and one county health rep. Fair, balanced, and despite what the mayor wants, knowledgeable. "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 9:21 PM:
" My Turn and the rest need to answer the question. It is simple. Who would you complain to? The Commission is one we can discuss the make up on but I don't think not getting your way is a reason to walk away from a good idea. Information needs to be out there unfiltered by anyone. The only thing I would say about too many MD's on it is that having an MD behind your name doesn't mean you know anything about business decisions which is what most of the commission would be about. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:03 PM:
" Nestor, your 4:57 posting is indeed interesting, but not very original. It is an exact duplicate of a Deak Swanson "rant" that I was "blessed" to be a party to about 10 years ago. It is clear who is pushing your buttons. I guess you aren't as smart as I thought you were. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 8, 2008 7:25 PM:
" Must be a slow day in the roofing business.
I'm starting a pool on when he gets kicked off again! I've got next Friday! "
Point O'view wrote on Aug 8, 2008 5:09 PM:
" Good grief My Turn, I think you need to find some hobbies, you have posted nothing but venemous political rant that is becoming more juvenile as the day wears on. I am thankful that we live in a country that believes in the political system, represents the people, makes decisions for hte better good, and allows competition and free market enterprise. I would say that this is probably the only occasion that you wish government was NOT running our lives. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 5:04 PM:
" difib- When this paper even attempts to seek an alternative view source on 'important' topics I will back off. Until then? They are fully aware of what they do. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:57 PM:
" Let me illustrate how our side would fight against this introduction of this Plan and City business.
-We have to spend our spare hours of the day to work on anything.
-The City works on this and get paid.
-We have to spend our money to collect information, prepare that information, and get that information out to the public (ads, flyers, etc).
-We also have to pay for the labor and information that the City collects and prepares to fight against us.
-We have to pay of our legal work.
-The legal work for the City is paid by us.
-The City gets ample and disproportionate free media coverage (especially Tribune).
-We will pay for a good portion of our information sharing in the very near future. "
dfib wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:42 PM:
" My Turn- they should call this your forum. ;)
If you want to quote me by all means please do so. However I would appreciate it if you didn't infer I know or don't know things I haven't posted.
Tower- I agree the commission is a sound idea, however I disagree with the make up that has been proposed. Politicians governing EMS that especially the Mayor continues to show he knows nothing about is scary business.
If anybody wants my breakdown of the proposal page by page I will have something posted on www.nocityambulance.com by the end of tonight I hope. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:21 PM:
" Can you say 'Binding' Referendum? "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:11 PM:
" You will soon see and hear high profile organized and prepared people, statistics, financial reports, and opinions from hands on people out in these emergency vehicles. Regardless your slam bam City business will not work this time! This is where we will take a stand. You will not 'fast track' this Plan without proper time after it just made it's debut on the County Web Thursday? There is much to be shared. Of course the Mayor stated, "That's one of the reason we look at elected officials because those people are being educated on this issue." Becsue he has the mnajority vote, for any reason, from the same Council Members. That voting statistic and number of closed door meeting vs. how many were closed will also be displayed soon. Stick around "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 4:09 PM:
" Tower. Tower, Tower- You are the flip side to me, except with better manners. Too bad manners for your side 'manners' are not being debated here. I and many others knew, and expected it would just be a matter of time before you laid down and introduced the 'fear' card. Base on fuzzy statistics at 'best', and inferences, and I am sure rumors to follow. Why not! You have nothing else to stand on. There was no problem with the current provider and service, at all. Actually the only bitching I heard at the Wed Meeting were about Fireman and their isolated (to be fair) terrible bedside 'manners'? Who took the time of their evening to come down and tell their story motivated on thier own with no communication from our side. "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:53 PM:
" At last we can talk about the issues. Who would one complain to? TSA/GL aren't going to discuss this. We need an EMS Commission, at least, who can view the raw records, settle disputes, manage the SYSTEM. Right now you can get only the information TSA/GL or FD want you to have. I think it is a little bit of hubris to declare yourself the best. Who says so? Ask the FD who the best FD is. Ask FSH or GL who the best hospital is. I don't see any independent source saying this system is the best. "
joeemt wrote on Aug 8, 2008 2:47 PM:
" Tower, at this time, the cardiac arrest survival rates are the only way to measure the service. I only ask you to look at where and why this started. Have there been complaints about Tristate either for patient care, response times or any other part of the business? If there has, I woud sure be interested in what these complaints were, and how many. I have heard of no complaints except possibly for the bill. No other complaints, why fool around with something that is working far above average? "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:51 PM:
" As far as cardiac arrest rates, it takes a team not one entity. If citizens don't know and do CPR followed by first responder with defib, followed by EMT-P, followed by a SHORT transport to a hospital you are not going to survive. Take any of them out and it is a failure. I know this shows we have a good system as far as that one point. It does not necessarily mean the whole system is good. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:49 PM:
" It has just come to my sometime remedial Norwegian brain. Tower, don't you have to go polish the brass pole you use to slide down when the bell goes off. Look, these relationships are pertinent! It is about politics, retention of jobs and budgets, and securing more power and money. Even if it is unpofitable, it has great cash flow. "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:46 PM:
" I do have a few questions. Why is the city's information on response times etc suspect and TSA is taken as truth? Do you really think TSA is not in it for money and only do this out of the goodness of their hearts? GL never has given money to TSA? Who put the money into the Holmen bldg?
Who buys the vehs? I doubt both sets of numbers on response times etc, the truth is in the middle. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:44 PM:
" If you cannot draw a line between the Mayor, his direction, a former campaign worker, her husband, who has been heavily involved in the FF union, and promises made, and favors to be repaid I am sorry. If you have been delegated to spin and twist with a void of any truth I am also sorry for you. Tell me how many FF were out knocking on doors for Mark's campaign? Because this all makes you uncomfortable, I am also sorry for that! "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:40 PM:
" Tower- You look silly attempting to rewrite history from the Wednesday night meeting. They go their heads handed to them. By the taxpayers, by the facts presented, and by their inability or over confidence in preparing themselves. Those of us that were there know how it went. Even if the Tribune did not care to give a factual evaluation in their reporting. Again WIZM had it right, and accurate. "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:38 PM:
" My Turn should put his alum foil hat on and ride his tricycle to the top of Grandads, its still open for bikes, and come down. Maybe we will be lucky and he won't make it. I don't care if she shook hands with the mayor everyday leave her out of it and stop being a bully to someone not in the discussion. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:37 PM:
" BTW, I have never had a wish or desire to be appointed to anything. Those that know me well will tell you same. The problem is the people of the 2nd Distrcit have been left unrepresented by largely the same gang that will vote to place the City in the Ambulance business. With our limited, already bloated tax contributions. The second District will not have a vote or representation until April 2009, while they are able to pull this out of the closet and vote on it in the very first month business cycle? I can get nastier, stick around. Need a list now of how the votes will go? "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:35 PM:
" So again I ask, what does his wife have to do with anything? You want to talk about what he said, fine. Leave the family out of it. I don't care what she does in the city. Also, I know several of the FF there and they were not forced to come anymore than TSA/GL were forced. Take out all of the people connected to TSA/GL, FSH, FD and first responder units, there weren't many left. I would not say a majority. The mayor was right even if you disagree with him. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:30 PM:
" Amazing! Since his wife Deb would have been run into by Johnsrud throughout his Mayoral campaign if he turned around fast, at anytime. She also is a School Board Member. Maybe she could wrangle another questionable deal for three 'free' ambulances if a, "referendum were to pass"???? Hey tower! Grow up. The rest do not wish to walk lockstep. "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:30 PM:
" I don't have a problem with FD doing the service.
I think this county and the muni in it have ducked their responsibilities in EMS for decades. I remember the police amb and they needed to be replaced but they offered no plan or sub to help covert to anything. TSA has not asked for money but they should have as there is no real contract without an exchange of something. This county has gotten by on the cheap for years. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:29 PM:
" To Tower- On the other hand I do not have to be nice, and do feel that all I have posted is relevant to ones history, character, and who he runs with, trades secrets, makes exceptions and exchanges favors. Of course difib is going to agree. He knows his role, and it is not the same as mine. Speaking of roles, I have already posted that I felt bad for the fireman and how they were used the other night. I an 'sure' attendance was mandatory, even if not mentioned. Mike Suchla spoke, was wrong, laughed at, corrected, and apologized. He was the only FF to stand up, "
4243 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:19 PM:
" I do agree with down2512. Tri-State is doing a super job. A fine example of the city running a business is Forest Hills Golf Course. This project was going to be a money maker for the city, but it is costing the taxpayers a fortunate. Give the course back to private business to run and start collecting property tax on the land and building. "
down2512 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 11:50 AM:
" While it seems like personal attacks it's in relationship to this topic. This is just a money grubbing tactic by the mayor, supported by Doyle whether he is representing the city or the county I question this man's policies and actions! We have adequate ambulance service with Tri State. They have their own projections for growth. Why can't the city keep their noses out of it and tend to city business!?! I don't want gov't ambulance service because it's just one more facet of life gov't gets their hands in I don't want it. Conduct the business of running the city and leave sick and hurt people to use the existing ambulance service. If they have another preference I'm sure they'll let you know at the time of their need. "
dfib wrote on Aug 8, 2008 11:22 AM:
" Tower- I agree this is not the place for personal attacks and we should be focusing on the issue at hand. Please relate your thoughts on the city getting into the ambulance. So far there have been very few supporting the issue, I'm still looking for a good argument from the other side to convince me it's a good idea... "
tower wrote on Aug 8, 2008 11:11 AM:
" I have not posted on this article before as I wanted to see what was said. MyTurn turns everything into a personal attack. That is why I didn't speak the other night. He has gone after the wifes of the CO Chairman and a FF. That is uncalled for. Stick to the point of the article or get off! This kind of smear is uncalled for and stupid. I know now why you can't get elected or appointed to anything. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:46 AM:
" If you were an honest Representative of the people, you would slow this proposal down. You would give CRG, and other good people a chance to gather 2950 signatures and place this program up for vote by the inhabitants of this City, County, or both. Instead, it seems you will sit on this 'introduction', and then slam it through as fast as your 'political' allies can. You count on the apathy of your citizens, and those of us on the other side of the coin are attempting to stir up and fight this apathetic attitude. The good sign was the attendance and the prepared and fact based attitude the other night at the first and only Meeting sharing your direction. "
medic1368 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:45 AM:
" If the City really wants to enter into the ambulance business, then they should do it in the manor it has been done in the past... cover the whole region. Spend the tax payers dollars, get the subsidy from Shelby, Cambell, Onalaska, Holmen, Farmington, West Salem and do it right. Supply the 6 ambulances to cover the county and offer the same experienced care. That would mean 3 million just to start for the ambulances. Then see how they control the cost of medical transport by increasing your taxes. That makes much more sense than fragmenting the UNBROKEN system we have now. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:38 AM:
" Your soft shoe presentation Wednesday was a train wreck, and those on the other side ground your unprepared rear end in the dirt. You are unashamedly emboldened by political backing in this folly and others like it on the backs of taxpayers you deemed do not have the intellectual capability to "understand"! "
Myturn wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:37 AM:
" Point of View- You are an apologist and a point man for this City Administration. You also are a newcomer that has risen only to speak on this issue. There has been, and is not bookkeeping system in place to tell anybody anything. The Finance Director's office should be a tour for all citizens, strewn with stacks of unorganized papers. Add to that this program has been in the closet for a year, and now it will be fast tracked to vote by minions and the majority of the Council in Johnsrud's back pocket in September? Only reflected all to well by the same nucleus of votes that passed a project with Tens of millions of our tax money without even reading contract or perusing plans. "
dfib wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:25 AM:
" Point O View - I'd be more than happy to follow that suggestion if the proposal included a failure clause that guaranteed no tax increase and a promise that if the city run ambulance did not pay for itself after five years it would be discontinued. No such clause exists. The consequences of such a failure can mean the death of Tri-State and the endangerment of regional care delivery. Take a look at the situation in Eau Claire currently, this is the what the citizens of La Crosse county could be facing in five years. "
Point O'view wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:06 AM:
" If you are so confident that this service will fail, welcome it, sit back and laugh at it, and wait the 5 years or so and make fun of the 5000 revenue. In the mean time, we will see how many TSA medics take firefighter training. "
Point O'view wrote on Aug 8, 2008 8:05 AM:
" There is alot of passion in the responses to this issue. But utimately, the patient needs the hospital and a doctor rather than a medic. On the ALS runs, I agree that having a paramedic is the best thing. But those calls are a small part of your day. The mayor and fire chief have a responsibility to ensure the residents of the community that they are being offered quality emergency services. I don't think that they would like to add this service to push tri state out of business or because they enjoy this circus that has been created by the proposal. Everyone attacks our government when privatising government programs is brought up, but when government wants to compete with the private sector for a public safety isssue we light torches and start the witch hunts. "
Insightful1 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 7:08 AM:
" Point O'View: Regarding competition; Tri-State has said all along that competition FOR the market is good and supports it. EMS is a "utility" type system requiring a lot of infrastructure to run effectively and efficiently. Numerous EMS consultants (including the most renowned consultant who analyzed La Crosse's system) advocate for NOT fragmenting a system through competition WITHIN a market. That leads to inefficiency, poor patient care and an uncessary duplication of service. "
Insightful1 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 7:04 AM:
" Point O'View: Be careful about the 140/148 postings coming from Tri-State employees.
Someone recently accused an audience of being stacked by one affiliated group or another which was promptly proven untrue when the majority of the room stood up and stated they were unaffiliated. There seem to be a lot of postings of the 180 so far that are not Tri-State employees. "
Insightful1 wrote on Aug 8, 2008 6:57 AM:
" Since there is a lot of talk in the community about transparency, how about this dialog?
Would the City be willing to set up an Enterprise Fund for all costs and revenues associated with their Enhanced EMS proposal? The methods for the allocations would be set up by an independent CPA and evaluated at the end of the 1st year (if the citizens authorize the program). Start small, perhaps just the ambulance component. If at the end of the 1st year, the program does not meet expected budget performance, it goes away.
In other communities where officials needed to be transparent, this was an effective tool. Is the Mayor / Fire Chief willing to commit to this level of transparency? Tri-State would be! "
hoponpop wrote on Aug 8, 2008 12:31 AM:
" Remembered another Mayoral Mistake: On why City FD allegedly gets there first. "We (LCFD) have 4 stations in the city of La Crosse. Tri-State has one in Holmen, and one in Shelby"
Mr Mayor seems to forget about the station on Buchner St., and the fact that TSA has numerous locations in the city that they regularly post an Ambulance including Bridgeview Plaza and 5th & Cass. The Woodmans' Post also ensures quick (quicker than FD) response to ValleyView, and Hwy 16. The "Shelby" Station is near the Shelby Fire Department, surrounded by "The City". "
hoponpop wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:19 PM:
" Finally, without quoting specifics that I don't know, if TSA beats fire, or fire beats TSA, it's typically a minute or two either way. TSA is pretty "transparent" with their fractile response times on their website for specifics. Unless LCFD is going to come running in with needles drawn ready to stick someone, any "delay" in having TSA medics patient side is mitigated by the fact that ANY provider, 1st Responder, EMT, Medic, all start with the ABC's of BLS. 1 minute, even 2 into a call is (should be) good BLS. Even a code, 2 minutes of effective CPR, then dfib, then drugs. Quicker diluted paramedics will not mean "enhanced" care. "
hoponpop wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:15 PM:
" Last point: per the numbers in the presentation by the city/ county.
Around $5k "profit" over 5 years. Around $1k/ year. Mayor says around 1,000 calls per year (1/3 of the 2007 call volume in the city BTW). So, $1 "profit" per call. Seems like a lot of effort for $1 per call.
One more item of fun, TSA ran 4,972 911 calls in La Crosse County in 2007. "Almost" 5,000. That doesn't count the direct requests to Tri-State (nursing homes and private calls), or any responce by Tri-State out of the county.
Thank you. (not a TSA employee). "
hoponpop wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:14 PM:
" 2nd, the mayor stated, "LCFD has around 4,000" medical calls per year, giving the fire-medics that much more experience with patient contact". La Crosse County Dispatch 2007 Annual Report (on their website), says 3,071 first responder calls. That's not "around 4,000". Around 3,000 maybe. There were an additional 1,188 fire calls, but a "fire" call is everything from a structure fire, to a "co" call, to lines down. No pt. experience on those.
EMD is another question. Fire runs hot to all calls, TSA utilizes EMD, and if their protocols call for a reduced urgency, they make everyone safer by going cold. That doesn't help them with their arrival time, but it makes everyone safer (staff and public). Many 911 calls are not true emergencies, not require the high risk that running lights and siren brings. "
hoponpop wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:13 PM:
" The City Mayor was the guest of Mitch Reynold on WIZM's La Crosse Talk PM Show Thursday Evening. See the the archives section on the WIZM website for the entire interview.
A few mis-representations that caught my ear (and I'm sure there's more that I didn't catch the 1st time):
"Currently LCFD sends an engine and a rescue to EMS calls". Not true- city typically sends a rescue out of 2's or 3's, Heavy Rescue out of 1's, or an engine out of 4's. For most medical calls, there's 1 LCFD apparatus. A code, or a car accident, yes more resources, but the mayor made it seem as if "we're saving resources" if they only send 2 trucks (ambulance and rescue). He then dodged the question when called on that by a TSA medic. "
medic1368 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:11 PM:
" Point of View...
Does having GLMC across town control your cost? When FSMC bumps their fees so does GLMC. And has it been said anywhere in any of these forums that there is a problem with the cost of our service. According to Chief Cleveland he is going to charge the same as TSA. The only thing that adding another service will do is dilute the number of patient contacts I will have to keep my skills the best they can be. "
Point O'view wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:59 PM:
" It seems that 140 of the 148 posts to date are from TSA medics. So I ask you, what is wrong with competition? We are so worried about taxpayers, what about the people that need a BLS ride to the hospital? What percentage of your calls require you to use ALS skills? You make it sound like all of TSA's calls are ALS calls. This is not the case, I would bet it is close to 25% of your calls are ALS. Should we close Franciscan Skemp because Gundersen does the same thing? Lets use competition to help control the costs of pre hospital care. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:50 PM:
" City Finance Director
Re: Public Records request dated April 1, 2008
Dear Mr. Nestor
On April 1, 2008 you made a request, under the Wisconsin Public Records Law, to see the Municipal Audit for 2006. Within this Audit I would like to see this fund enumerated within the audit. When the audit is presented, only major funding is presented separately and all small funds are categorized collectively (end)
Now read it all over again, please! Because you might be a constituent that cannot comprehend something this involved. (give me a break!) "
medic1368 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:41 PM:
" How much ALS will the Paramedic 1st Responders actually get done in the 4.21 minutes before TSA gets there. A good patient assessment to determine the next level of care takes at least that long. With Cleavelands plan, his 1st REsponders will start care then ride in with TSA. If that happens, when will TSA medics ever get to use their skills? Are we not just then providing the ambulances to the Fire Department Free of Charge and turning the TSA medics into ambulance drivers? "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:39 PM:
" We should all feel bad for the men and women of TSA and the FD for the upper bozo's at the city. "Mayor crap for brain" sat on the stage with that smirk on his face If you all noticed the mayot walked out of the meeting for 10 minutes while you the people talked. Goes to show you how much he really cares. Matt time to move to Lacrosse and run for mayor. "Mayor I take the short bus Johnsrud," need to be removed from office. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:35 PM:
" So tell me which one is it? AND Is there any difference really with our Finance Department?
Most importantly I am so happy Cleveland and some other guys? from the Fire Department either know which Wisconsin Cities have their ducks-in-a-row, or do they gauge them by clean desks and shelves? Or maybe Cleveland perused their individual books and ledgers? OH YEAH! "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:34 PM:
" E-mail to respond to Steve Gores figures from the WI Taxpayers Alliance
8/4/08
From: Fire Chief Greg Cleveland
To: Steve Gores, Mayor Johnsrud, Andrea Richmond
The Wisconsin Tax Payers Alliance does a nice job of summarizing expenditures for local government services; however, there is always the disclaimer which most people pay little attention to. The disclaimer speaks about how communities do not list their expenditures in the same format or account for them in the same manner. For example some Wisconsin cities do not place their personnel expenditures in the individual department. They reflect these expenditures in the in another general services budget this understating the cost of the department/services. (end) "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:34 PM:
" Mayor WIZM 8/7/08 Regarding P&L shown on screen during meeting- The numbers have been determined by the Chief Cleveland and the Fire Department and have been determined by studying other fire based systems around the State of WI. (end) "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:22 PM:
" anon continued - Now you say that "98% of calls are quite basic". That means that according to the cities plan they will be receiving $180 reimbursment for a BLS call compared to the $365 the chief expects to receive from every call. How far does that put the project in the hole? Thank you for pointing that fact out. Lastly thank you for your criticism. Wish you would have either show up or spoken last night. The only way the public can be fully informed is open honest debate, we shouldn't be relying on those with a political or hidden agenda to educate the public. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:15 PM:
" Mayor WIZM 8/7/08-Look at how hard it is in discussions to get people to understand and the difference between cost/revenue/level of service. Thats one of the reasons we look at elected officials because those people are being educated on this issue. This is a very difficult issue to get people to understand what the total process is. How can you educate 10,000 people in the City of Lacrosse what the right decision is. It is not sure they are going to make an educated decision based on all the facts. (end)
Read it twice, please! "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:12 PM:
" anon - There is no one here bashing the fire fighters, their lying chief is another story. Since it's lonely in your corner I'll throw you a bone. I've performed 2 cricothyrotomies in the past decade. For the non-medical people reading a cricothyrotomy is an emergency incision through the skin and cricothyroid membrane to secure a patient's airway during certain emergency situations, such as an airway obstructed by a foreign object or swelling. Granted this isn't an every day skill, and if you need to do it your patient is likely on deaths door. Would you rather have someone who has done it once or twice or someone who just got done reading about it in a book? "
anon wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:43 PM:
" And remember that all the firefighters are experienced in handling medical calls. I bet many more years on average than tristate. They might not be experienced medics, but if you have great BLS skills you will be a great paramedic in not time. Remember 98% of calls are quite basic and if you can handle those with composure then the ALS ones will be a breeze. How many of you experienced paramedics have used all your skills such as cricothyrotomy or needle decompression? If you have not then does this make you inexperienced? NO!! Neither are firefighters. "
anon wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:29 PM:
" Why don't you people form a tea party and get together to complain to each other. There are 52,000 people in La Crosse and its the same 4 or 5 people that complain. Get a life. "
sa00 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:28 PM:
" $1,000,000 x .005 (.5 percent of a bank savings account) = $5000.
Simple enough math for me. "
ryan67imp wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:06 PM:
" Kraft makes a really good boxed Spaghetti, Its one of my favorites. It is inexpensive and delicious, I see no reason to try any other brand. "
ryan67imp wrote on Aug 7, 2008 9:03 PM:
" Hmmmm, 3 calls a day? 12 medics?, so that's an average of less than 2 calls a week per medic. I sure hope if i go unconscious a more experienced medic from Tri State gets my call. "
DJ: wrote on Aug 7, 2008 8:54 PM:
" .. more smoke and mirrors to dazzle the same crowd that voted Johnsrud and Doyle in... and will probably vote for Obama. You get what you pay for. You'llll be sorrry. "
stevegorescrg wrote on Aug 7, 2008 8:32 PM:
" Mayor Johnsrud and County Chairman Doyle could have gotten this debate off to a much better start(for them) if they'd been more open about their ideas/intentions from the get go. Instead, they hid behind closed doors and the so called "mediation process" which one of the key parties - Tri- State evidently left over a month ago. Is there any wonder people are now suspicious and skeptical- reminds me of the Dick Cheney led energy policy study and Hillary's health care reform study- pesky press and peasant public not invited. After all, they only pay the whole freight! The only way to restore public confidence in the integrity of the decision process regarding this critical community issue is quite clear to many citizens but opposed by the mayor( and probably Doyle)- a public, city wide referendum- let the people decide- it's their loves anf health at stake! "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:44 PM:
" The Mayor has been spewing the word transparency almost as often as enhanced. He made the comment today on WIZM that Tri-State has no fiscal transparency. The truth is he has never asked. I spoke with Matt from Tri-State this afternoon at length and he informed me the city has never requested to look at Tri-States books. Conversely he is even willing to open the books to a member of the community that identified himself as a CPA and questioned the cost of an ambulance last night. There is no question left which side is open and honest and which is trying to get one over on the citizens in my mind... Always remember Tri-State posts their performance markers on their website. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:43 PM:
" While the issue at hand is of the utmost importance, we all should be acutely aware of the lies that spew so easily from the Mayor and Chief. The Chief owes Tri-State an appology for bashing them with the made up figure of them arriving 5-6 minutes after the fire department 90% of the time. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:29 PM:
" What part of this step into the ambulance service are some of you not getting?
Doyle thinks the votes are there at County and City.
He also stated that this could be up for a vote as early as September in City, and followed with a County vote as early as five weeks later?
Thee will be a 'binding' referendum Moderate.
Go tell your pal, and answer difib's question. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:17 PM:
" To "The Moderate" Could you please clarify which question you are refering to?
Many thanks. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:14 PM:
" We should all be supporting the fire department in it's current form. Honestly to all the disrepectful opinions I have heard claiming they do little work makes me sick. The very fact that there are few structure fires in the city attests to how well they do their job! EMT-B/first response care? Excellent! Technical rescue? Excellent! Let's continue to give these professionals the tools and funding they need to perform their best,not saddle them with additional duties and certifications to justify their existance. "
joeemt wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:11 PM:
" So Johnsrud just wants to handle the increased calls in 2010? Is it possible that due to costs going up that TSA may need the increase to maintain the slim margin it has now? "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:10 PM:
" Lastly the fact of the matter is, if the fire department can afford to staff an ambulance with current personnel they are overstaffed. To expect fire/medics on an ambulance to put fire duties before patient care is irresponsible medical care. Furthermore I don't imagine the fire fighters that will be trained as paramedics are thrilled to be doing the job. If their passion was medicine wouldn't they already be working for Tri-State or one of the hospitals? "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:09 PM:
" I will admit the Mayor's answer to your question was convoluted at best. But I also thought your question might have been the most stupid question I heard all night (& there were a lot of stupid questions). "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:06 PM:
" If you really want to stir the hornets' nest perhaps the suggestion of privatizing the fire service through a regional ems/fire service delivery vehicle like rural-metro needs to be discussed. It would be interesting to see what a private firm could provide with the budget currently enjoyed by the fire department. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:04 PM:
" Why are the mayor and chief pushing against the trend? Quite simply they hope to negate further argument from Tri-State and the community that they are an inexperienced provider. Picture this five to ten years down the road,Tri-State is slightly financially weakened by the fire department taking some of their call volume in the city of La Crosse, the mayor/chief will now testify that the system has become unstable and they must take it over to ensure La Crosse residents will receive an ambulance. Experienced providers is now not such an issue since their paramedics have seen their 40-80 patients a year for the last x-number of years. A city run ambulance is then forced down your throat and the chief giggles at his expanding and now justifiable budget... "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 7:03 PM:
" Case in point is the issue of paramedic first response. The national trend is to move away from paramedic first response due to the increased cost and decreased patient outcomes. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 6:56 PM:
" Here's my take. This comes from over a decade in the business and watching this kind of fencing in several communities. Ladies and gents what you are witnessing is the city making an end run for the ambulance business in the city to preserve fire department budget and jobs. They have no good rational to justify the expense of city ambulance start up all at once so they are starting by just easing a foot in the door. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 6:52 PM:
" Sorry that should have been 'committee Chairperson', rather than committee members. He fought to appoint the Chair-people on committees. I guess it is just illustration of yet another layer or rung of people just like the local taxpayers who are not able to comprehend? Thank goodness we have these 'smart' control freaks around, and amongst us. Thank you Steve and Mark. We are not worthy. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 6:47 PM:
" Remember that Doyle just fought tooth and nail to appoint his committee memebrs on the County Board, rather than have those individual committees vote for their own? Who mediated that! You know Doyle, County Chairman/Voting board member/ambulance mediator, that's the one! "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 6:45 PM:
" difib- I am glad to hear someone else heard that our intellect was not worthy. Might misquote the Mayor like the statement he made when a good portion of the room heard it, and reacted together? last night? The Mayor did not answer my question, Instead he rambled on like Bill Clinton or he suffers from ADD. Who put these 'numbers' together, and where can we peruse how they were derived at? Then it happened, the FEAR card was dropped. Response time. Oh yeah, that's what is pushing this takeover, response time? The Commission? Who appoints it? Who is exactly on it? difib, you need to lay this out for us. "
kevin2502000 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 6:41 PM:
" First off I am not from Lacrosse or work there. I do however hold licensure as a paramedic in 3 states including WI. I have been a paramedic for over 8 years and work FT. If anyone says a new medic is as good an experienced one, obviously it is a new medic speaking. I have learned so much that only field experience brings. I can tell you horror story of new medic stupid mistakes which almost cost a life. That is why when we hire new medics they are paired with experienced ones to learn the real world. Experience speaks VOLUMES and I would bet Docs would agree to this. Good Luck hope I don't need an ambulance in Lacrosse and have to instruct my caregiver how to start an IV or do it myself. "
Jenifr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 6:20 PM:
" I agree dfib, that would be the simplest solution, however it is also going to cost. All of the services dispatched through the GLMC dispatch center pay for that service. Is City Fire willing to do the same? I know you're familiar with what TSA pays a month, so maybe you can come up with a figure that would be fair for city fire. And don't forget to include that in the cost figures. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:58 PM:
" Wrong again MyTurn. I was at the meeting. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:26 PM:
" Apparently according to the mayor's comments on the Mitch Renolds show, we the citizens of La Crosse are not smart enough to make an informed decision if the issue was to go to referendum... "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:15 PM:
" Furthermore, you will note that the chief's proposal made no mention of how the billing would be done. Billing EMS calls is an art onto itself. You basically have the choice of an untrained person attempting it with a detriment to collections or outsourcing the work and paying for it. Perhapts the best option would be for the FD to collaberate with Tri-State, utilize the same reporting software (consistent care delivery and quality assurance) and utilize the Tri-State billing department. "
dfib wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:11 PM:
" Regarding the GPS units:
The current set up by Tri-State involves a combination GPS/cell based internet/mobile wireless system. Using any similar systen the FD ambulance and Tri-State ambulances can be shown on any server running the Franson GPSgate software. Being Tri-State already utilizes this software it would make the most sense for then to simply add a VHF radio to the FD ambulance (FD currently uses UHF) and the same GPS/cell/wi-fi system. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 5:05 PM:
" For goodness sake, Johnsrud just stated on the Mitch Reynolds show that he was misquoted. Now we have a poster reporting that he does not recall?
BTW, who is concerned citizen? "
Jenifr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 4:28 PM:
" Informed Citizen: you're right there is programs like that out there but you are going to have to give ultimate dispatching control to one or the other dispatch centers. Even if 911 can see the TSA gps units, they are not able to dispatch those units. The same would be said if GLMC has the LAX Fire gps units. So even if we had that information you're still going to lose time talking back and forth. Hope that helps. "
down2512 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 4:07 PM:
" has anyone else read the coulee news article today? about the sand from Lake Neshonac? that's why I scrutinize everything Doyle has his hands in that I'm aware of. That and other county projects. They are all fee generating endeavors that serve no more value to the public than what we have now. Just like this-it's all about money period. "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:56 PM:
" MyTurn: Concern Citizen is completly right on his last post. "
InformedCitizen wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:53 PM:
" jenifr:
perhaps there is some sort of software program that can be implemented that automatically notifies the dispatcher which unit is closest.
I was under the impression that the closest unit (police, fire, ems) responds in the current make up. If that is the case, how is that system run? couldn't it be applied to any system? forgive me if I am being naive. "
InformedCitizen wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:44 PM:
" MyTurn:
I recall moments when the crowd laughed/groaned at Mayor Johnsrud (spaghetti) and Chief Cleveland (TSA 5 minutes after fd). When did the crowd express distaste or laugh at doyle. Other than those who were upset at him not holding everyone to 2 minutes.
And I mean when was there collective disapproval not something you disliked. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:38 PM:
" "I guess I didn't realize it was about Steve Doyle"? Well there it is, you were not at the meeting last night. I guess me and a good portion of the room missed it when we laughed at his nonsensical statements. Maybe it was when he tried to 'lead' us to believe that he was nuetral? I specifcally remember because that was when Matt from Tri-States eyes rolled in his head in disbelief. Doyle looks kinda funny attempting to adorn three hats at the same time (County Chair, Mediator, voting Member). "
Jenifr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:34 PM:
" I completely understand the workings of GPS systems, but who will have the ultimate control over all of the gps units. Will county 911 have to figure out where each TSA unit and where each city ambulance is before they dispatch the call? Or will they give the call to the GLMC dispatch center and make them figure out who is closer? Also, the EMD process is controlled by GLMC. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:31 PM:
" Say what you want Moderate. AlthoughI know I was not one of the three that were looked at with disdain last night. I am sorry I am not in your favor, or you do not "like me" LOL. If you open and fund a Frat house I will be careful not to waste my time applying. Gol-darn-it, and I just pruchased a new sweater to tie around my neck. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:07 PM:
" I thought this was about the city proposal to get into the ambulance business MyTurn. I guess I didn't realize it was about Steve Doyle. For the record, I don't like him anymore than you do. "
insightful1 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:59 PM:
" Regarding response times, I believe Chief Cleveland was mistaken.
According to Tri-State's published response times (http://www.tristateambulance.org/performance/key_performance.htm), our average City response times are 5:20.0 seconds. Per the La Crosse Fire Departments web site (http://www.cityoflacrosse.org/index.asp?nid=990) their average response time is 4:21 (by the way, to get the average time for Lax FD, you have to ADD their "Activation Time" (the time it takes to get from the lounge chair to the fire truck) and their "Response Time" (the DRIVE time from the station to the scene).
So, we are 59 seconds behind Lax FD on average.
It's also interesting that since Tri-State started publishing our reports to our web site, La Crosse FD is as well. They even modeled their reports and web style after ours! Will they report financials soon? "
InformedCitizen wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:52 PM:
" fortsa123:
As far as I am aware the city does not run the EMD, Tri-state does. Also a gps tracker does not give the city or the county any control over Tri-state, it simply provides the closest unit. The goal of the plan was for dispatch to not know which rig they are sending. "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:42 PM:
" Concern citizen: You knob job, why would the city have gps for Tri State Ambulance. Do you really think the people at Tri State are going to allow them to have this??? Come on!! Then it would be the county and city making the decisions for Tri State don't think so. "
InformedCitizen wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:35 PM:
" fortsa123:
I would imagine that if Tri-State all have gps that if the city were to go buy 2 new rigs they could put a similar system in the vehicle so dispatch could track them as well as tri-state.
Granted, I don't pretend to know how GPS works but I would imagine that since GPS all use satellites it's just a matter of tapping into the system. But if they can't that is another question to ask. If it would cost more money to track a city ambulance that would be another mark against the plan "
mjr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:29 PM:
" I hope Padeskys first fund raiser will be a spaghetti dinner. ( I hope your paying attention Kooch) P.S. This is the nail in the coffin for Skid mark, so long and dont trip on your new carpet on the way out in April!!!!!!!! "
girly2 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:28 PM:
" TSA is actually a subsidiary of GL if anyone is interested. Has anyone looked at why those response times were longer for TSA? Maybe most of the rigs were busy on calls and the closest rig was not as close as normal. TSA does try to station their available rigs in central spots when they are busy to help the response time. Are all of the City's firestations going to have ambulance rigs? Say a particular firestation's ambulance rig is out on a call and there is a 2nd call in the area, isn't that going to increase the response time? "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:19 PM:
" Informed Citizen: You are partically wrong. Cleveland stated that his trucks have GPS that the FD can track. Tri State does have there own GPS we use to track. Is the County or City going to purchase the link between Tri State GPS and the FD's, don't think so. "
Im Still Jackson wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:18 PM:
" I still think that the sole purpose of this is to drive Tri State out of business then take over a managed care ambulance service for profit run by the city = THE TAXPAYERS! "
Im Still Jackson wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:15 PM:
" Remember the old saying "if you give a person enough rope they will hang themself"?
Well those idits at city hall are looking pretty tangled up right now like a fishing lure in a river willow. "
JennyN wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:58 PM:
" "People of knowledge shouldnt be the decision-makers on the body, he said. Boy, that's showing real intelligence, isn't it?? Personally, my life is the last thing I'd want at the hand of La Crosse government. Just one more thing they want to control. Only a matter of time (years)before they DO put Tri-State out of business and then UP goes taxes, DOWN goes quality of care, and guess what? You won't be able to do ANYTHING about it because its run by the city! "
InformedCitizen wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:46 PM:
" to Jenifr:
I believe the plan is that the dispatch will have gps locations of the rigs
to fortsa123:
The literature provided at the meeting last night indicated that the response time for Tri-State averaged 4 minutes and 32 seconds. "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:40 PM:
" Matt.. Last night it was stated that tri state shows up 5-7 minutes after the Fire Department. Would you pleae post the truth so every know.Thanks "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:38 PM:
" what is going to happen when a transfer from Franny's comes in and the fire ambulance is the closest unit. Are they going to be making the trip to Madison, Rochester at 2am. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:32 PM:
" Ran out of money? Do you have any idea how many junctures Doyle will have to pass County voting because he 'mediated'. Ran out of money, priorities people, just like going through the trouble of filling District Two seat, priorities. They do, and don't have a 'ringer' ready, yet! This vote and the impending City Budget vote, 'leave it empty' someone murmured. Priorities. "
Jenifr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:28 PM:
" And here's a question that I haven't seen answered yet. The proposal says the 911 center will send the closest ambulance. How will they know where the TSA ambulances are and how will the TSA dispatch know where the city ambulance is. If you're going to have to radio back and forth to find the closest truck, won't that waste any time you might have gained???? "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:27 PM:
" I think I am an Attorney. I think not. I do know when someone is coming at me with a bar of soap, and when I am bent over. Hey Moderate- You want some more to add to the omitted Sandcastles/Family First mandated Court Order list. How about our former DA, and 'On Too Many Boards'. Need more. Before Marc and his pals at the Trib delete this, It is all Germain, and you and I pay for it? "
Jenifr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:26 PM:
" First off as a resident of La Crosse County I believe that Mr. Doyle overstepped his bounds. His concerns should be what is best for the county not the city. He should have firmly stated that anything that is done to jeopardize service to the county should be avoided. Last I checked the city of lacrosse is in the county. They should start acting like it!!! "
fortsa123 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:24 PM:
" Medic183 nice job last night I was really impressed. All Tri State employees keep up the good work. "
The Moderate wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:15 PM:
" LOL - now he thinks he is a lawyer! Nestor, you are a roofer. Imagining that you are something else doesn't make you what you aren't. "
Myturn wrote on Aug 7, 2008 12:59 PM:
" Slanderous, serious? Bring it on. I would love, and always desired a legal forum to bring this particular wife up on the stand. As this entire net of Attorneys and good ole boys seemed to carry out favorse/exemptions, at least oversights, that apparently were not meant for the working man or woman in this case. Unless you think everyone lined up to receive their final divorce decree, and their are two Attorneys out in the hall laughing with their oath hand around the door jamb? 'Splain' that one to me, I guessed I missed the humor. "
medic193 wrote on Aug 7, 2008 12:58 PM:
" For those interested I will continue to post facts and figures (as well as a bit of personal opinion) on my website related