ryeguy wrote on Aug 31, 2008 8:15 AM:
" I meant Snopes. "
ryeguy wrote on Aug 31, 2008 8:06 AM:
" OK. Obama was tired. He did day he had "been to all corners of the country, fifty (pause) (pause) um seven? states with one left to go - not Alaska or Hawaii, I wanted to but the staff wouldn't let me go." This is pretty close anyway to what he said. YOu can go watch it at Scopes. This means he allegedly thinks there are sixty not 57 states, since he still had one to go plus AK and HI. An obvious misspeak. My guess is he could name all fifty in alphabetical order if pressed. "
enuffalready wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:22 AM:
" But Brian you still haven't adressed the 57 states issue. He DID say it and he hadn't been to Alaska or Hawaii yet because his staff wouldn't let him go. So what say you?
Regarding the Naval Academy issue. He got in, graduated (first or last it doesn't matter) and then served his country. I guess I missed that part on Senator Obama's resume where he was in the military and served his country. Oh, my bad, guess he didn't do that. "
seekthetruth wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:07 AM:
" How many times were we told how Washington would be different with a Dem controlled House. Yet nothing changed in 2006 and still we think Obama is going to be some big change. The power brokers that run this country will not let anyone hold office if they do not bow to their demands. Try google on CFR and Trilateral commission. And that was 57 states, not including Alaska or Hawaii, Obama has been to Brian, try reading the news. This level of incompetence was the top of his class at Harvard? The dumbing down of America is working very well "
BrianGSmith wrote on Aug 30, 2008 7:56 AM:
" Too bad this concern for facts and factchecking didn't exist before and during the build-up to Bush's boondoggle in Iraq. They were lying their two faces off and no one but the few Patriots were waving the red flags of alert.Obama was one, Feingold another. It's no coincidence that they are two of the brightest in the Senate. "
BrianGSmith wrote on Aug 30, 2008 5:18 AM:
" Dear "wiseup"....We certainly can reduce alot of useless foreign aid....the aid we give loser Nations like Pakistan so they buy our weapons is a prime example of a few Billion in savings alone. Tariff's? The Republican Congress levied tariffs on imported steel, imported Vietnamese shrimp, and more to protect their elite plantation owners. We tariff ethanol from Brazil to protect our pampered and teeny weenie sugar producers...After nearly two terms of total Repub control one would expect that we have no tariffs and we let the free market rule....but alas the TRUTH reveals one of many huge hypocrisies the GOP owns. "
BrianGSmith wrote on Aug 30, 2008 5:12 AM:
" Dear "wiseup"...Perhaps you need to read the text of Obama's sublime address from this past Thursday. No less than 29 times did he mention specific actions to do what he says he wants to do.....what the majority of Americans want done. Newer programs he wants will be paid for by eliminating the Corporate Pork that weighs down the government budget, by eliminating loopholes, by requiring the super rich to pay their fair share. Getting out of Iraq alone will save us 10's of Billions. Useless Pentagon projects, weapons programs designed for the 1950's will be shootcanned. Pouring this money into US infrastructure will create employment, keep the money "in house" and buoy the economy. "
Common Sense wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:33 PM:
" One thing you have to say for Brian G Smith, he NEVER lets the truth get in his way. He's got a real nasty streak, too. "
wiseup wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:32 PM:
" Brian, the one that PROMISES the MOST will be doomed as the BIGGEST LIAR. Obama makes unbelieveable promises with NO FUNDING! Without bi-partisan support and FUNDING, all the promises will be broken. Hillary and Bill promised health care for the last 25 years and THEY had a better chance than Obama of making it happen! ps You can't put tariffs on all imports, break all our trade agreements, cut foreign aid AND make THEM LIKE US AGAIN! "
BrianGSmith wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:29 PM:
" Dear "enuffalready"...Maybe you are tired. Methinks Barack knows the difference between Shi-ites and Sunnis and how many homes he owns or if he recounted the names of the Steelers or Packers to the VC hosts......McCain graduated at the bottom of his Naval class and only got in, like Bush, cause his Daddy had power. Obama was the top at Harvard... You support losing men......a cancer of reason. Hope you don't have any kids to infect. "
enuffalready wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:44 PM:
" But Brian:
Barack did, in fact, say that he had visited 57 states, with 1 more to go. Feel free to check it out on youtube. Maybe he was just.....tired. "
wakeup wrote on Aug 29, 2008 12:05 PM:
" Does this mean the Tribune will provide fact checking for the letters, ads and articles it publishes - especially those provided by the AP. "
BrianGSmith wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:24 AM:
" Another point......one candidate is desired and he speaks at full football stadiums regularly..the other won his party by being the best of a group of undesirables. "
BrianGSmith wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:22 AM:
" Dear "sekkthetruth".....what the heck are you talking about? 57 States? You need to hit the sites the Tribune editors recommended in this editorial. Get up to speed. "
seekthetruth wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:03 AM:
" As usual, America gets to decide who is the least desired as our leader. And we have two real winners here folks. One choice is a man who thinks we have 57 states. The other wants 100 more years in Iraq, yet he does not even know the bordering countries there. These are college grads? The best America has to offer? How about a new game show - "Are you smarter than an American Senator?" This whole election has been a media-flamed propaganda circus. Ron Paul was right, we lose with either choice. "
Common Sense wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:48 AM:
" Then we have the politicians who take something their oponent said, a gaff or something said in jest, and report it as the other candidate's belief, even they know, and everone who saw it happen knows, that it was not a serious statement. The politician tries to turn everyone who didn't see it happen against his oponent. Nothing makes me madder than being lied to to get my vote. I guess they think we are all suckers. What does that say about the character of the politician? "
Common Sense wrote on Aug 29, 2008 9:40 AM:
" What ever happened to the days when it was important to be able to back up what you say? Now, anyone can say or write anything, and it all goes into the mix. Already, we are getting to the point where we have a hard time telling what is the truth and what is a flat out lie. What does that say for the future of civilization? "
Teiresias wrote on Aug 29, 2008 8:42 AM:
" So, will the Tribune re-post this ad the day after McCain accepts his nomination?
After all, it would only be "fair and balanced" to do so. "