A task force dedicated to planning out the future of the city’s fire department recommended Tuesday the city add a fifth station, in addition to remodeling and replacing other outdated facilities.

The seven-person committee unanimously voted on a series of recommendations to Mayor Tim Kabat and the La Crosse Common Council, including building a public safety facility to house the La Crosse Fire Department administrative offices, the La Crosse Police Department and the city Building and Inspections Department, building new stations on the far north and far south side of the city, replacing the station on the intersection of Losey Boulevard and Green Bay Street and remodeling Station 1 at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and Market Street.

Jason Gilman mug


“It’s been 80 years in the making to get us here today, and over the next handful years I’m really setting the benchmark for the next 80 years,” said La Crosse Fire Chief Ken Gilliam.

The last time the city built a new station was when it built the stations on Fifth Avenue and Losey Boulevard in 1967. The city’s other two stations — on Monitor and Gillette streets — were built in 1956 and 1941, respectively. Those buildings have reached their life expectancy, said Gilliam.

“We’re pouring a tremendous amount of money into these stations, and it’s really like pouring money down a hole right now,” Gilliam said.

While the department is doing what it can to upgrade and maintain the stations, the remodels and replacements could provide huge savings in day-to-day operational and maintenance costs.

“We’re fixing things on a regular basis that are just whammying our budget, because things are just falling apart,” he said.

FILE -- Ron Tischer


Police Chief Ron Tischer laid out the priorities of the task force, starting with the new stations on the city’s North and South sides, in particular getting a replacement for the station at Liberty and Gillette streets.

“Touring that facility, we can’t allow our firefighters to live in those deplorable conditions up there, so I think that’s, probably, from what I saw, the first thing that we need to take care of,” Tischer said.

Answering questions raised by La Crosse Common Council member Doug Happel, also on the task force, Gilliam said he was confident the department could run five stations without hiring more firefighters.

“We’ve come up with a way to move our assets around to better protect things on a five-station model with no increases in personnel costs, so no things that’ll drive that levy up,” Gilliam said.

Instead, they’ll move around staff and equipment to keep the entire city covered and ensure the fire department is meeting the national standard of four-minute response times. In cases of structure fires, as well as the health emergencies such as heart attacks that the department responds to, that response time is critical.

“If we move a fourth station further south, something is going to give in those national standards benchmark for response times,” Gilliam

Gilliam and Tischer said the exact location of the stations would be best determined by the city’s fire and planning departments, along with an expert consultant; however, keeping facilities close to downtown is important as that’s considered a high-risk area by both the fire and police departments.

“It’s ultimately going to be up to the council to decide how many stations we’re going to have and how we’re going to pay for it,” Tischer said.

The group recommended the city look at completing the project within five years, but recommended that timeline be reviewed as the city looks into strategic ways to structure debt and options for other funding sources, like grants.

City planner Jason Gilman said there might be options for the city to create some sort of mixed use building with a public-private partnership and also suggested looking at ways to spread the investment out, rather than asking current property tax-payers to foot the bill for the entire project, which could range from $4 million to $9 million per building or even reach as high as $33 million for the public safety building, according to estimates.

“What we’re building here is a legacy. We’re basically laying out a legacy infrastructure project that’s going to serve the community for 75 to 100 years, that’ll save on energy costs, keep our people safe, better working conditions, better ability to attract quality, skilled people,” Gilman said.

However, he said that price can be hard to swallow for people.

“The reality is that we usually spread that out over a long-term period of years through debt structuring and creative financing and things like that,” he said.

From Tribune files: Fires damage La Crosse area buildings


La Crosse city government reporter

Jourdan Vian is a reporter and columnist covering local government and city issues for the La Crosse Tribune. You can contact her at 608-791-8218.

(8) comments

Hillary 4 Prison

Someone needs to stop these out of control bureaucrats. La Crosse has the HIGHEST per capita fire department IN THE STATE! The response times are excellent (that's what you are paying dearly for). There is NO NEED for another station that these scoundrels will fail at maintaining like the others.


Hey, no problem, the taxpayers would really like the opportunity to pay for the Chief's legacy.

No problem.



Buena Vista

No new fire stations. And while we're on the topic, a reduction in firefighters AND law enforcement is what is really needed. Way too much money is already being spent on surplus manpower and ridiculous equipment the police departments say they need. - I can't drive from one end of the city to the other without seeing at least 3 to 4 cruisers. What are they all doing? Where are they all going. - What a waste...


This old bird does not leave the nest often, however on one of my flights earlier this year I couldn't help but notice the new building behind the Losey Blvd station. I am pretty sure it has to do with the existing fire station .So did taxpayers just fund something that will not be there in five years?

Rick Czeczok

Why, we have been land locked for 50 years, population has dropped, and more safety measures are in place then ever before in houses and commercial buildings. Stop spending our money, if you have to much money and think you need to spend it, give our money back. We are way overtaxed in this city because of poor management practices. If you don't believe that, go look at the inventory the city has built up of product at the green island facility.


Fix the existing facilities. La Crosse has more firefighters per capita then other cities in the state. Hard to believe in this day we are paying people to sleep. The work schedule needs to be looked at.

union conservative

The state eliminates state tax and the city and county suck up what the state gave back to the people. Hopefully when elections come around people remember this. Incredible!


total nonsense. Yes, update some facilities, but no new one. We have many more police and firemen than any comparable city, and it's just another case of empire building that always happens. The firemen don't live in the facilities. They are paid to work there, and part of the work covers sleeping at work. but they do not live there.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

We hope you have enjoyed your complimentary access for the month.

Now it's time to activate or sign up for unlimited access!

Thank you for signing up!

We have not been able to find your subscription.

Current Subscriber?

Current Subscriber?


Don't have a subscription?