the ethical life

Richard Kyte: We lost the art of conversation

2012-06-17T00:45:00Z Richard Kyte: We lost the art of conversationBy Richard Kyte | La Crosse La Crosse Tribune
June 17, 2012 12:45 am  • 

When politicians and pundits call for more civility in public life, what, precisely, are they calling for? Do they simply want people to be nicer to one another, or do they want something more substantial?

After all, being nice is not the same as being good. And even though we stress to children the importance of being nice, it’s but the first step toward mature ethical behavior, not the final one.

Preschool teachers know that one of the first things children need to learn is how to use words to settle disputes. At first, they need to learn what words to use; later, once they’ve learned the words, they need to be reminded to use them. It’s not unusual to hear a teacher on the playground, in an effort to turn aside a confrontation, say something like: “Emma, use your words.”

Adults also need reminding, not only about what words to use, but how and when to use them. That’s because words are the principle means by which we give shape and meaning to our lives. To refuse to speak to another, or to use words only to bully, disparage, coerce or manipulate, is to treat others as less than human, as not worthy of full participation in the human community.

The word “conversation” still carries in its origins the remnants of this rich meaning. It comes from two Latin words, con (“together”) and vertere (“to turn”), and it suggests that the ways in which we speak to one another are what bring us together. But it also implies that words may be used to drive us apart. It is significant that the Latin word for sin was aversio, literally, “to turn away.”

For most of its history, the word “conversation” referred to something like “a way of life.” It would be used to describe someone whose words and actions expressed peace and integrity, an attitude of getting along with others. Paintings by Dutch artists Vermeer and Ter Borch were called “conversation pieces,” not because they provided something to talk about, but because they depicted a way of life characterized by domestic tranquility.

The King James Version of the Bible, from 1611, translated Philippians 3:20 as “For our conversation is in heaven,” suggesting that heaven is the place where people turn together in peace. There is no other word in the English language that so succinctly expresses the notion that our daily words and actions constitute the very quality of our lives together.

“Civility” is the contemporary word we commonly use to express our desire for peaceful discourse. But it is a poor substitute for “conversation”  — it suggests a superficial politeness, for one can keep a civil tongue while harboring deep resentments.

Discourse that seems uncivil may in fact be constructive. Healthy disagreements are the very lifeblood of a family, or an organization, or a community. Disagreements can reveal passionate commitments to an idea or a cause.

Apathetic civility is not a desirable condition, but healthy disagreement is. In healthy disagreement, people take turns pointing out errors of thought in order that both sides may reach a shared understanding.

Though both divisive speech and argumentative speech may look the same on the surface, they are driven by entirely different motivations. While divisive speech uses words to coerce, manipulate or deceive in order to gain some particular outcome, argumentative speech uses criticism in order to correct error or enhance understanding, to get people to a state of agreement.

What is so discouraging about much of our current public discourse is that words are routinely used in ways that undermine community by turning people against one another, but they are rarely used to engage others in serious dialogue about substantive issues. In short, we have too much divisive speech and not enough argumentative speech.

Being civil to one another is important, but it alone does not determine the quality of public discourse. As the character Frank Burn says in an episode of “M*A*S*H,” “It’s nice to be nice — to the nice.” He could have added that it’s better to be good — to everyone.

The Ethical Life is a series of reflections on the ways ethical thinking influences our actions, emotions and relationships. Richard Kyte is the director of the D.B. Reinhart Institute for Ethics in Leadership at Viterbo University.

Copyright 2015 La Crosse Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. ClassWarz
    Report Abuse
    ClassWarz - June 17, 2012 1:17 pm
    Kyte: "The King James Version of the Bible, from 1611, translated Philippians 3:20 as “For our conversation is in heaven,” suggesting that heaven is the place where people turn together in peace."

    The Xtian bible is where "people turn together" for cruelty and violence, not peace:

    "Cruelty and Violence in the Bible"
  2. Buggs Raplin
    Report Abuse
    Buggs Raplin - June 17, 2012 12:07 pm
    Of course the greatest culprits of divisive speech are politicians. But such is the nature of politics. Nothing's going to change that. Nothing. All of this talk by establishment pundits of the need for 'civility' is so much nonsense. As long as no one gets killed or maimed, let the arguments proceed. In this country where our freedoms are being eroded daily by an evil government, it is only natural that we become angry at what's being done to us by our 'leaders. It appears that at no time in our history was there ever a call for civility. When Thomas Jefferson was asked by a friend about what could be done about his rival, Patrick Henry, he stated that about the only thing that could be done was to devoutly pray for his death.
  3. great
    Report Abuse
    great - June 17, 2012 11:50 am
    The Attorney is there to ask question of, nothing else. If you or any of your fellow members have spoken out of session they should recuse themselves. If you follow the life of integrity.
  4. great
    Report Abuse
    great - June 17, 2012 11:47 am
    Richard- You are on the Lacrosse County Ethics Board. Just make darn sure you have no communication with anybody in regard to that Complaint. As it should be and was not before?
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick