NAME: Jacie Gamroth
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER: 608-386-5698
E-MAIL: gamrothj@aol.com
AGE: 21
NUMBER OF YEARS LIVED IN LA
CROSSE COUNTY: 18.5 years
FAMILY: Mother-Tammy Gamroth,
Father-Tim Gamroth, Sister-Mallorie
Gran
EDUCATION: 3rd Year student at the
OCCUPATION (if retired, former occupation): Student
at UW-L, District 5 Common Council Alderwoman and District 5 County Board
Supervisor
ELECTED OFFICES HELD (include years served):
District 5
District 5
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND MEMBERSHIPS:
UW-L Asian
UW-L Native American Student Association
UW-L Vanguard (Tour Guide)
UW-L Chancellor Joe Gow's
Community Council
NAACP -
A. Why
do you want to serve on the La Crosse County Board? (Please limit this answer
to 75 words so it will fit into a standard format.)
Living in
B. What
are the two most pressing issues facing
1.
Affordable Government for homeowners and renters alike. The main issue is
lowering property taxes, whereas, a portion of my constituency owns their
own homes and try to maintain high property values. Renters are affected
just as well by property taxes through rental payments.
2.
Collaboration among local government entities, and statewide. As we face
the task of economic sustainability, the rising cost of healthcare, and
generations graduating from college looking for jobs, we need to find the
strength in numbers to come up with innovative programs and resources to
efficiently provide services.
The next
several questions will ask your feelings about past and future actions by the
county board. Please answer by putting an “X” next to the statement that most
closely reflects your view. Then, please explain your reasons in writing
1. Do
you support or oppose reducing the size of the county board by half?
Strongly
Support
Support
No
opinion
Oppose -
X
Strongly
Oppose
Reason:
I oppose this for the simplicity of the statement. This statement does
not specify when and how it would affect the wage of the Supervisors and when
and how it will be achieved. 35 members cannot be mathematically cut in
half, but if it were proportionally reduced, it would be best to wait until the
2010 census. This would ensure equal districts. The concern about
doing it now, is losing important representation that is found in a larger,
more diverse board. I would be concerned about losing the student
voice. It is also proven that larger boards have lower taxes.
2. With
the switch to a county administrator four years ago, how satisfied are you with
the county board’s new role as a board of directors that makes policy decisions
rather than operational decisions?
Very
satisfied
Satisfied
- X
No
opinion
Unsatisfied
Very
unsatisfied
Reason:
For the terms that I have been on the
3. How
satisfied are you with the county administrator's new four-year contract?
Very
satisfied
Satisfied
- X
No
opinion
Unsatisfied
Very
unsatisfied
Reason:
Again, I appreciate the work of Public Administrators in general. Steve
O'Malley has done a good job in organizing the County's budget. In 2007,
he saved
4. How
satisfied are you with the proposed “smart growth” comprehensive plan scheduled
for county board approval in coming months?
Very
satisfied
Satisfied
- X
No
opinion
Unsatisfied
Very
unsatisfied
Reason:
The plan is a forward-thinking and pro-active plan that considers the future of
land use. Developments may start in a township or a village, however, if
may sprawl to a school district and may need increased services.
This plan considers the possibilities of other parties getting involved and
finding ways to solve problems before they occur.
5. Do
you support or oppose having the county board hold a referendum before
borrowing money for buildings or other capital projects?
Strongly
Support
Support
No
opinion
Oppose -
X
Strongly
Oppose
Reason:
Currently, school districts are required to hold referendums for borrowing
money and for capital projects. For
6. Do
you support or oppose
Strongly
Support
Support
- X
No
opinion
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
Reason:
I support
7. Do
you support or oppose
Strongly
Support
Support
- X
No
opinion
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
Reason:
An overcrowding jail it costs the county more money, puts more responsibility
on the jailers and jail employees, and the numbers only continue
to increase. By taking those that are not a danger to the public
outside of the jail, it saves the county money and provides more opportunities
for those on Justice Sanctions to start getting their life back on track
faster. This is a philosophy that is now leading other counties.
8. Do
you support or oppose spending more of the county's budget reserves to reduce
the property tax levy?
Strongly
Support
Support
- X
No
opinion
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
Reason:
I support reducing the tax levy, but I still would be cognizant of the purpose
of reserves. I would not want to exhaust reserves and end up spending it
all at one time. There is no need to follow in the foot steps of the
state and federal government when it comes to spending reserves, and I would
mention that the reserves held do increase bond ratings.
9. Do you
support or oppose the state of
Strongly
Support
Support -
X
No
opinion
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
Reason: By
limiting the County's ability to raise property taxes by 2%, it is the people
that receive public services and the people that work for the county, that
are the ones limited. Again, no one is in favor of raising property
taxes, but we have to think of the benefits to those we are helping when we
work together.
10. Do
you support or oppose the county's plans for a $29.5 million jail expansion?
Strongly
Support
Support
- X
No
opinion
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
Reason: I support it
because I voted for it, but so did the other 34 members of the La Crosse County
Board. We must face the fact that jails are growing and overpopulating
statewide. There is a new population that jails are taking in, and that
is the mentally ill. If a person needs medical attention for a mental
illness, but needs to be in a jail setting, someone has to step up to the
plate, and this time it is the County. I also support the project for the
programs that will be instituted. People incarcerated need not just sit
in jail, but rather have the opportunities to become educated and active in
their community. There was also no raise in taxes for residents in the
county from this project.