COUNTY BOARD CANDIDATE DATA SHEET

 

NAME: Roger J. Plesha

 

ADDRESS: 929 King St.

 

PHONE NUMBER: 608-782-1150

 

E-MAIL:

 

BIRTHDATE: 1/15/1953

 

NUMBER OF YEARS LIVED IN LA CROSSE COUNTY: Entire life

 

FAMILY: One son, Keith, N. Plesha, a computer hardware and software engineer headhunter, living in Madison

 

 

EDUCATION: University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Mass Communications/photography

 

 

OCCUPATION (if retired, former occupation): Professional Photographer / Advertising consultant

 

 

 

ELECTED OFFICES HELD (include years served):

La Crosse County Board 1986 – present

La Crosse City Council 1986 – 1998

City Council President 1992-1997

Wisconsin Counties Finance and Personnel Steering Committee State Chair, 2003 – 2006

International Trade Business and Economic Development Council – Finance chair – present

Mississippi Valley Health Services Inc. president – present

 

 

COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND MEMBERSHIPS:

La Crosse Area convention and Visitors Bureau – past director

La Crosse Plugs – director

Preservation Alliiance of La Crosse – past treasurer

La Crosse County Historical Society – past director

Riverfest – deck hand and past director

Braves of Decorah Order of the Arrow BSA – Brotherhood

American Legion Post 52 – SAL

Blue Star Drum and Bugle Corps Alumni Assn. – past member, past staff member

Saint Joseph the Workman Cathedral

 

 

La Crosse County Board Candidate Questionnaire

 

A. Why do you want to serve on the La Crosse County Board?

I became active in the community at 13 as an ambassador of La Crosse with the First Federal Blue Star Drum and Bugle Corp. I was, and still am proud to represent our city. I enjoy playing an active part in shaping the region we live in. My record shows one of preservation as well as forward thinking. I believe we can make a difference, making educated decisions, in maintaining county services with increasingly limited resources.

 

B. What are the two most pressing issues facing La Crosse County, and what do you think La Crosse County government should do about them?

The Lakeview deficit and the state of Wisconsin’s biennium budget deficit projected to be over 400 million dollars and its impact on our county.

Lakeview Health Care Center has become a financial burden to La Crosse County. Over the past few years Medicaid funding has not kept pace with the costs of providing care for the residents of Lakeview. The vast majority of the residents of Lakeview are court ordered placements. The Lakeview deficit will hopefully be addressed with the newly formed Mississippi Valley Health Services Inc. (MVHS) MVHS is a collaboration between La Crosse County and nine other counties, which will lease Lakeview. Collaboration has been a word often thrown around but rarely put into practice but it will be the future of county government. As the newly elected President of the MVHS I hope to continue to lead Lakeview into a new era of collaboration, maintaining the quality of life for the residents of Lakeview.

The State of Wisconsin’s deficit will pose many new problems that we will have to work out. Because of the underestimating of revenues for this biennium budget counties may have to face even more of the financial drain. The State presently does not pay the full amount of the mandates it imposes on the counties. With more budget cuts from the state we may see a further reduction in the under funded mandates. La Crosse is in a much better position than many of the other counties. It is not an accident that we are in a good financial position we have been frugal with the taxpayers dollars! Being concerned about out tax dollars is the reason we are 3rd lowest in taxes in Wisconsin.

 

 

 

 

The next several questions will ask your feelings about past and future actions by the county board. Please answer by putting an “X” next to the statement that most closely reflects your view. Then, please explain your reasons in writing

1. Do you support or oppose reducing the size of the county board by half?

Strongly Support

Support X

No opinion

Oppose

Strongly Oppose

Reason:

I support a smaller board but I do not know that half the size of the present board is the best size. We will also have to look at representation in the rural areas of the county. Reapportionment will happen in 2010. This is the logical time to make these decisions.

 

2. With the switch to a county administrator four years ago, how satisfied are you with the county board’s new role as a board of directors that makes policy decisions rather than operational decisions?

Very satisfied

Satisfied X

No opinion

Unsatisfied

Very unsatisfied

Reason:

I am satisfied with the county board’s role in policy planning but I think we have been successful in the past holding the purse strings, keeping an eye on the spending in the departments that we oversee. I like to be kept in the loop about how our departments are doing so that we can act, rather than react, when faced with an impending problem.

 

 

3. How satisfied are you with the county administrator's new four-year contract?

Very satisfied X

Satisfied

No opinion

Unsatisfied

Very unsatisfied

Reason: I have been on all the committees that have hired the three predecessors to the present administrator. I believe that we have a good man at the helm of La Crosse County.

 

4. How satisfied are you with the proposed “smart growth” comprehensive plan scheduled for county board approval in coming months?

Very satisfied

Satisfied X

No opinion

Unsatisfied

Very unsatisfied

Reason: I think it is necessary to have people realize that there is no new farmland. Development should not go rampant. Urban sprawl causes many problems. Wisconsin has an abundance of water other states are not as fortunate. We are the number one producers of both string beans and carrots. We are number two in producing sweet corn. We could someday be the breadbasket of the country mainly because of our water resource. We all have to be good stewards of the land.

 

5. Do you support or oppose having the county board hold a referendum before borrowing money for buildings or other capital projects?

Strongly Support

Support

No opinion

Oppose X

Strongly Oppose

Reason:

I believe that the board was elected to make the tough decisions on borrowing and spending. We operate the county with an annual budget of over 200 million dollars. We have capital projects throughout our budget. Holding public hearings and talking with our constituents help us make these decisions.

 

6. Do you support or oppose La Crosse County being the main developer of its vacant Lakeview Farm property in West Salem?

Strongly Support X

Support

No opinion

Oppose

Strongly Oppose

Reason:

I strongly support the county as being the main developer. I sit on the industrial park committee as well as being the chair of the Lakeview Health Center. When a decision has to be made I first think of the impact that the decision may have on Lakeview and the quality of life there. I think it is important that we keep a watchful eye to do what is best for the county as well as the residents of Lakeview.

 

7. Do you support or oppose La Crosse County's criminal justice philosophy, which includes finding alternatives to jail for offenders who are not a danger to the community?

Strongly Support X

Support

No opinion

Oppose

Strongly Oppose

Reason:

I strongly support the county’s criminal justice philosophy. Most people who are placed in jail do not gain anything from being there, they may even pick up more bad ideas there. Recidivism is a problem that I would like to see come to an end. By giving people alternatives to jail, justice sanctions can lead the offender to a better path. They can figure out just what the problem is and give proper direction to the offender. Their follow up of the individual is also a plus.

 

8. Do you support or oppose spending more of the county's budget reserves to reduce the property tax levy?

Strongly Support

Support

No opinion

Oppose

Strongly Oppose X

Reason:

I believe that budget reserves should be used as a last resort to reduce the property tax levy. When I was elected to the county board the county rating was very low. We were told at the time it was partly due to the lack of budget reserves. In the early ‘70s the board used surplus for the tax levy leaving very little for an emergency fund. It has taken many years to build a reserve and to get our rating to where it is today. History need only repeat itself with another landfill disaster or another type of disaster to better understand why we keep a contingency account.

 

9. Do you support or oppose the state of Wisconsin's use of a "property tax cap" which limits La Crosse County's ability to raise property taxes by 2 percent, or the percentage of new construction growth, in 2009?

Strongly Support

Support

No opinion X

Oppose

Strongly Oppose

Reason:

Not all counties are or ever have been like La Crosse County in its spending. Because we have one of the lowest mil rates of the 72 other counties the percentage of increase makes our budgeting work harder each year. We will work within whatever rules we are given, and make it work, even though the state does not impose the same rules on itself that we must live within.

 

10. Do you support or oppose the county's plans for a $29.5 million jail expansion?

Strongly Support X

Support

No opinion

Oppose

Strongly Oppose

Reason:

When we built the present courthous and jail we intended to replace the Huber center and women’s jail. I had expected we would have replaced the women’s jail sooner than this, but we made a thorough study of our needs. Studies take a great deal of time to complete. This study has determined many needs that we could not have anticipated when we built the first jail. La Crosse County has taken a much different approach to criminal justice than we had 10 years ago. Truth in sentencing has also changed. I think we have a good building project by virtue of the meticulous study we have concluded.