Gogebic Taconite president Bill Williams touches an outcropping of what he said was magnetite near a proposed mine site. The company has since pulled out but Iron County officials say owners may find another operator.

Iron County Board members say owners of a controversial proposed mine site met with them last week to ask if they would be open to a new developer coming in to try to extract iron from the Penokee Hills.

County economic development officials arranged the meeting between three County Board members and representatives of La Pointe Iron Co., which owns much of the land that Gogebic Taconite tried to develop before pulling out in February.

A La Pointe representative declined to comment Friday, but two of the County Board members who attended the meeting Wednesday at the Iron Skillet restaurant in Hurley said they were told that other potential developers — with better qualifications than Gogebic Taconite — have expressed interest.

“They said they hadn’t heard anything definite yet,” said Opal Roberts, who has served on the board nearly eight years. “They played everything pretty close to the chest.”

Roberts and another board member, Vic Ouimette, said that if a proposal comes forward, county residents will likely remain divided because of concern about environmental damage a mine might cause to the forested Penokee Hills and its streams and wetlands.

But if state and federal regulators are able to ensure the environment is protected, a mine could be worth pursuing, because the area desperately needs jobs, they said.

Iron County’s unemployment rate is over 9 percent, the second highest in the state and nearly double the statewide rate.

Gov. Scott Walker and fellow Republicans who control the Legislature said jobs were the goal in 2012 when Gogebic Taconite helped them rewrite state laws to relax regulations for iron mining. Two years earlier, a similar proposal narrowly failed.

Company officials faced a number of public setbacks. Permit applications they submitted to state regulators were repeatedly sent back for more information. After a protest led to an arrest, the company hired a heavily-armed, masked security detail from Arizona, but then withdrew them when it became known they weren’t licensed to operate in Wisconsin. There were public battles over closing off land to recreational use and the discovery of suspected asbestiform material on the site.

Ouimette said Gogebic Taconite’s performance could make it more difficult for another developer to gain the trust of county residents. Part of the “bad taste” the company left came in revelations that surfaced last year about the company’s $700,000 donation to an outside political group, Wisconsin Club For Growth, in 2012 while the group was supporting Walker’s campaign to defeat a recall attempt, Ouimette said.

The company removed test borings and other rock samples for testing, but seemed to make little progress, and then expressed surprise at the large number of protected wetlands on the site before trying to blame a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency decision in Alaska when the site was abandoned, Ouimette said.

You have free articles remaining.

Become a Member

Register for more free articles.
Stay logged in to skip the surveys.

Roberts said the La Pointe representatives said the EPA might have been a small part of the reason Gogebic Taconite pulled out, but the main reasons were that the company had no experience in iron mining and didn’t see a way to make a profit.

The Cline Group, which formed Gogebic Taconite to develop the Penokee Hills iron deposit, operates coal mines.

George Meyer, director of the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation, said the organization believes protections for wetlands and streams should be restored to the mining law, but it doesn’t have a problem with portions of the new law that set tighter time limits for the state Department of Natural Resources to review mining permit applications.

DNR mining programs director Ann Coakley said that her office hasn’t been contacted about the possibility of a new mine developer.

News of the meeting first surfaced last week on the Woods Person blog, written by Iron County resident Dick Thiede, a retired machine designer who has followed the mine project closely.

Ouimette and Roberts said the landowners representatives were David Meinecke and David Adams, who said they were from La Pointe, and Paul Eger, who said he was from Global Minerals Engineering. La Pointe Iron Co. and Global Minerals Engineering share an address in Hibbing, Minn.

Roberts said she told them that it will be important to see local residents receive training that would make them qualified for skilled mining jobs so that all the higher-paid positions don’t go to people from outside the area.

“The Iron County Board has always stated that they want a mine if it can be operated with environmental protections,” Roberts said.

The 2014 County Board election drew an unusual number of challengers. Wisconsin conservative group Americans For Prosperity distributed campaign materials blasting seven candidates as “radical anti-mining” environmentalists.

Ouimette won despite being one of those targeted by the group, which was founded by billionaire conservative businessmen Charles and David Koch. Ouimette campaigned as a proponent of responsible mining.

On Sunday, he said it wasn’t clear how a new developer would find a way to build a mine without harming the environment, but he was pleased La Pointe had reached out to elected officials early. He said the landowner’s representatives said it was possible that a new developer would propose a technique that would be more successful than the one pursued by Gogebic Taconite.

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(15) comments


These would-be miners just need to send Walker a fat check. He'll have Stepp's DNR work out the details. Pay to Play. It's the Repub way.


the DNR found asbestiform minerals there last year. the asbestiform minerals have the same spiny crystals that pose health issues as asbestos minerals . and I am a professional geologist and an environmental expert. the wetlands pose a significant challenge to any development and even more so to an open pit mine.


The demand for Frac sand has dropped off the scale. Does anyone remember the real reason Gogebic wanted the mining rights in the first place? I thought not.

Gogebic only wanted the mining "Rights" they never said "they" were going to mine the site!
They were very specific about "a" mining operation and the there would be mining done, but they didn't say by whom.

Fact is they simply wanted the rights free and clear to be able to sell them to a Chinese mining company.

Fran sand on the open market is about as valuable right now as fools gold.

I guess there truly are people out there who you can fool all the time.

you think you know

This has absolutely nothing to do with frac sand. Are you that out of touch, or just trying to gin up old fears?


USAF whines: "You libs need to stay in your city cesspools and leave the wilderness to us that live there and KNOW this country. Stay away from us and our land, we want no part of you or your misinformation." How about all us city cesspool dwellers not pay taxes that service your area if you want us to stay away so much??


trying to make some money off your land?


Are you an environmental impact specialist? Didn't think so. Have you ever set foot in the proposed mine area? Didn't think so. You liberals base your existence on scare tactics with no real-world experience associated with the misinformed rhetoric you spew. I own land that the Bad River flows through and know firsthand how the lack of jobs in that area hurts many, many families. I've spent many years (since the mid 70's) in that immediate area and know that ground better than any liberals anywhere would. You libs need to stay in your city cesspools and leave the wilderness to us that live there and KNOW this country. Stay away from us and our land, we want no part of you or your misinformation.

AirForce Retired

From one retired Air Force guy to anither. Get a grip on reality. Your only point that is provable is you cant make a point withour calling everyone libs.


There' no way to mine that area without damaging the wetlands, area rivers and streams. People have tried to mine that area and found over the years that it can't be done without damaging the environment. I think this is the third time someone has tried to do this and backed out because of the damage it would cause and the asbestos coming from the mine affecting the air quality in the surrounding area.

you think you know

There isn't asbestos down there like you are imagining, and you are using that as a scare tactic.

An asbestiform fiber is not the same as asbestos used mid-century for building materials. The term abestiform refers to the properties of a mineral, in that they resemble that of asbestos containing material.


Back when the first mining company came in many years ago they said they couldn't control the asbestos that would become airborne. That was just one of the many reasons they never mined there years ago.


Read the report for yourself http://media.jrn.com/documents/Iron-Mining-Review-011014.pdf It's all in here if you don't believe

you think you know

So which of the 103 pages did you find that on? Because I read about half and found numerous references to MN mines, and even they said there was no evidence that the asbestoform minerals were the issue.


Look at the index it will show you where to look


It starts on page 32 and goes though page 34

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.