Subscribe for 33¢ / day
Meteor AK Knapp sand locator map

A judge has rescinded a permit for a Georgia timber company to build a frac sand plant in Monroe County wetlands.

In a ruling issued Friday, administrative law Judge Eric Defort concludes the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources didn’t have information required by state law when it issued a permit allowing Meteor Timber to fill 16.25 acres of wetlands for the proposed $70 million processing and loading facility near Millston.

Defort reversed the permit, which had been challenged by the Ho-Chunk Nation and Clean Wisconsin, who argued that destroying the “pristine” forested wetlands — home to several rare and endangered species — would open the door to the destruction of more rare wetlands.

“This is a significant victory for the people of Wisconsin, our pristine wetlands, and the integrity of our environmental laws,” the groups said in a joint statement released Friday. “The decision confirms that DNR did not follow the permitting process required by state law. This decision reinforces DNR’s duty to protect our natural resources for the public. We will continue to defend the public’s right to protection of our natural resources in the legislative, agency, and judicial arenas.”

Several former DNR employees, including former Secretary George Meyer, testified against the project during a five-day hearing in March, saying the agency granted the permit in spite of staff findings and a long list of unanswered questions.

“It is abundantly clear that the DNR did not have the necessary information to assess the net positive or negative environmental impact of the proposed project at the time that it issued the permits, as required by the statute,” Defort wrote in his decision.

“Notably, the DNR explicitly announced in both versions of the permit that it lacked information that the DNR deemed ‘necessary’ for it to consider the applicant’s proposals with respect to the net positive or negative environmental impact.”

Meteor has not said whether it will appeal the decision in circuit court.

Meteor spokesman Chris Mathis issued a statement through the company’s attorney saying while he respects the decision, “we at Meteor Timber disagree and do believe that the economic and environmental benefits of this project merit further discussion and thought. We understand that this process is a lengthy one, with much deliberation, and we will continue to work toward ensuring that this project can benefit the local communities that will be impacted.”

DNR spokesman Jim Dick said the agency was reviewing the decision “to determine what our next steps might be.”

Meteor had proposed to restore and preserve more than 640 acres of other land near the the 752-acre site, which would serve two nearby mines on land the company acquired in 2014 when it purchased nearly 50,000 acres of Wisconsin forest.

However, the DNR determined those mitigation efforts “are not likely to fully compensate” for what it calls “permanent and irreversible” secondary impacts from activity on the site and may not compensate for the direct loss of 13.4 acres of “exceptional quality” white pine and red maple swamp, which is considered an imperiled habitat.

Meteor has said the project was the only way to prevent much of the site from being clear cut by the current owner, who needs money to pay off fines for previous wetland violations.

Republican lawmakers in the state Assembly twice this spring passed legislation that would have allowed Meteor to proceed with the project even while the appeal was pending. Both bills died when the Senate declined to take them up.

Nathan Conrad, spokesman for the pro-mining Natural Resources Development Association, said he expects Meteor “will continue to work toward a positive result for this much-needed project.”

“The environmental and economic benefits that could be reaped are immense, and the broad support from the local community and elected officials showcases the need for this $75 million investment in Wisconsin’s future,” Conrad said in a statement. “The United States Army Corps of Engineers has approved this project, and with that in mind, we expect future decision makers will see all sides of the issue and come to the right conclusion.”

Chris Hubbuch can be reached at 608-791-8217. Follow him on Twitter @chrishubbuch.



Rhymes with Lubbock. La Crosse Tribune reporter and data geek. Covers energy, transportation and the environment, among other things.

(4) comments

Matt Foley

Meteor has said the project was the only way to prevent much of the site from being clear cut by the current owner, who needs money to pay off fines for previous wetland violations. The threat of clearcutting a fragile forest ecosystem, an owner who has to pay for fines for wetland violations. Two wrongs down make a right. Meteor comes to the rescue. What will they leave behind, "restored wetlands". It is about time the DNR does their job.


Scooter got spanked again. He’s has gutted all agencies that are supposed to protect the environment and citizens in the state to satisfy his rich buddies. He’ll find out how good these buddies are when he is voted out. This clown has set the working family back a hundred years in Wisconsin and has indebted several generations thanks to Scooter’s Folly, i.e. Fox Con.


The sand mine owners , together with the Republicans who we have elected to protect our interests could care less about the trauma and suffering that hundreds of citizens of west central Wisconsin are experiencing . Many cannot sell their homes, land values have plummeted as a result of these sand mines. Remember, November will soon be here to throw the bums out who could care less!!!


Good. Republicans have undermined the entire process and purpose of the DNR, turning it into a rubber stamp so their rich pals can make short-term profits while the people face long-term damage to our environment.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.