Subscribe for 33¢ / day
Transportation Forum

Wisconsin DOT Secretary Dave Ross visits with La Crosse Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Vicki Markussen Tuesday before speaking at a special forum covering key issues impacting transportation in the state.

Wisconsin Transportation Secretary Dave Ross acknowledged Tuesday that the state has not adequately funded local roads, but he says the solution doesn’t involve increasing the revenue stream.

Instead of increasing gas taxes or vehicle registration fees, he told a group of about two dozen at a La Crosse Chamber of Commerce forum, the state can address underfunded local roads by slicing the funding pie differently and using a new system that will better match funding to needs.

“We need more money for the local road program, there’s no doubt about that,” said Ross, who was named transportation secretary early in 2017 after the resignation of Mark Gottlieb. “We don’t spend enough on the local roads. We need to do more.”

One way the state could free up more money for local road funding, Ross said, would be to take on fewer “mega projects.” The state is involved in five such projects now, but if the state didn’t take on so many there would be more money to share with counties and municipalities for their roads.

Also, he said, the state could free up money for local road through “efficiencies” and completing projects more quickly.

+1 
La Crosse County Board Chair Tara Johnson

Johnson

+1 
Ron Chamberlain

Chamberlain

The pie-slicing strategy suggested by Ross didn’t sound like a viable solution to La Crosse County Board Chair Tara Johnson and Highway Commissioner Ron Chamberlain.

“How do you go faster? What’s the incentive, what’s the plan for making those projects go faster?” Johnson said. “The notion that cutting up the pie differently is going to solve the problem is disappointing.”

“I have to disagree with the secretary on the funding stream issue,” Chamberlain added. “We haven’t seen inflationary increases to keep up with inflation. Simply reallocating existing funds does not address that issue.”

In addition, Johnson said, completing the mega projects already under way will take time, so the redistribution of the state’s transportation dollars would be years off. “Where do we get the money in the short term to pay for unsafe roads and bridges that need repair?”

That’s a question the county is asking voters in a four-part referendum on the Nov. 6 ballot.

At one time, General Transportation Aid payments from the state to local governments covered about 30 percent of local road work, but that has been shrinking for years, down to about 18 percent now. Chamberlain maintains that even with a return to the historic 30 percent GTA level, the county needs to do something to address its list of $101 million in identified road and bridge needs.

To start to get caught up with those county road projects would take spending $5 million per year, Chamberlain figures, and the county referendum asks voters, first, whether it should spend that $5 million per year.

The three ensuing questions on the ballot ask voters whether they support a 0.5 percent sales tax on tourism-related goods and services (a premier resort area tax), a $56 annual vehicle registration fee (or “wheel tax”) on cars and light trucks or a 15 percent increase in the county’s portion of the property tax.

There was no discussion of the county transportation funding referendum at the Chamber forum, but several participants pressed Ross on what can be done about La Crosse Street, the badly deteriorated road on which the Chamber offices sit.

As it turns out, not much.

Ross noted that La Crosse Street, which also is state Highway 16, is on the DOT’s list of “enumerated” projects as part of the controversial “north-south corridor” study. State rebuilding of La Crosse Street is scheduled for 2025, and the DOT has a policy of not doing repairs on a road that’s slated for major work.

Ross also noted that after a Legislative Audit Bureau report on the DOT that was critical of its practice of dividing up transportation funds among DOT districts based on a fixed formula, the DOT is working on a new data-driven system that will be better focused on need.

“The roads will ask for the dollars rather than the districts just getting fixed dollars. The dollars need to be moved to the need,” Ross said. “That’s the fair way to do roads in Wisconsin.”

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
0
3
2
0
6

La Crosse Tribune entertainment and county government reporter

Randy Erickson covers arts and entertainment and county government for the La Crosse Tribune. Contact him at 608-791-8219 or randy.erickson@lee.net.

(10) comments

mrmojorisin

Johnson and Chamberlain are right on this one. It is unfortunate the important position of Secretary of Transportation is currently filled by someone with very little interest in sound transportation policy or reasonable transportation funding. Until that changes, the transportation system will continue to deteriorate. "The wasteful bureaucrats" is just a blame game meant to distract the public from the real issue of having politicians that lack the courage to make tough decisions.

canman

There is plenty of money collected to fund the needed infrastructure if the politicians would learn how to budget and say NO to every squeaky wheel groups “needs”.

Cassandra2

If you can do it better Canman, run for office.

johnnybragatti

Repubics don"t like raising taxes , they think it makes "em good?
Get rid of your car ,since it won"t be worth jack !!!,
after driving on "em, rated 49th in the Nation.

Cassandra2

He must've been studying "new math".

Sick and Tired

Chamberlain is part of the problem when it comes to roads. He took the money that was supposed to be used for County Rd C and spent it on other cr@p so now it is being done half a@s like he does with everything else. He broke Adams County and he is doing a great job at doing the same thing to La Crosse County.

Rick Czeczok

NO MORE FEES OR TAXES.......

lacrosseguy

I like roads and new infrastructure, so I'll happily pay more taxes and fees to get them. You can't have roads without paying for them. Stop being greedy.

Cassandra2

The Russian troll is engaging in magical thinking, just like the DOT chief, if it thinks that infrastructure can be maintained without taxes or fees.

Redwall

Chamberlain seems to have it right. Wasting in La Crosse alone 10's of $millions on roundabouts no-one wants, rest areas overbuilt, etc. could have been spent on actual needed projects.

The state has no monopoly on waste though, waste by City and County government is just as bad if not worse.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.