{{featured_button_text}}
La Crosse War Eagle mural may be sunk; building likely to be razed for car lot

The former Weagel Schubert Meat Market and residence at 520 S. Third St. includes a mural of the War Eagle riverboat on its north side.

The nomination of a Third Street building as a historic landmark could affect the expansion plans of a downtown business.

La Crosse’s Heritage Preservation Commission has accepted the nomination of the Wenzel Schubert Meat Market and residence at 520 S. Third St. by Barbara Kooiman, president of the Preservation Alliance of La Crosse. A mural of the War Eagle riverboat covers the building’s north side.

By accepting the nomination, the commission has not approved landmark designation. A public hearing will precede a vote on that.

Rahn Pischke, president of Renegade Enterprises LLC, which purchased the building, opposes the designation and intends to tear the building down to construct a landscaped parking area. The interior of the building is in poor condition, he said.

In her nomination, Kooiman writes about the string of businesses that have occupied the building, beginning with the Schubert Meat Market from 1884 to 1902. It was followed by the La Crosse Bottling Works Inc. from 1902 to 1966 and Lakore Electric Motor Repair Inc. from 1969 to 2002. It was vacant when it was purchased by the owner of Pischke Motors.

Renegade Enterprises has applied for a conditional-use permit to demolish the building and has requested the parcel be combined with others “to create additional sales space to meet retail demands,” Pischke wrote in a letter to the city. The project will include landscaping, decorative railings and black top, he said.

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
2
0
0
2
3

(3) comments

allcav

The mural is deteriorating. Someone take a high res photo of it for the Riverside museum, and then raze the building as planned.

canman

If the owner of a property seeks historic status is one thing, but when this status is forced on a owner, the people pushing the issue should be made to front all costs associated with preserving the property as well as compensating for all lost revenue over the life of the "historic " designation.

Berks

Key word here: EMPTY. The building is not useful in it's current state in it's current location. Pischke's have created more good paying jobs that have benefited the community far greater than these do-gooders ever have.

If they get their way, the city will pay Pischke's $300,000 for this building, then turn around and sell it to $10 for someone to create another hangout for hipsters, musicians, and artists.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.