NEW YORK (AP) — After five years of investigations and protests, the New York City Police Department on Monday fired an officer involved in the 2014 chokehold death of Eric Garner, the black man whose dying cries of "I can't breathe" fueled a national debate over race and police use of force.

Police Commissioner James O'Neill's said he fired Officer Daniel Pantaleo, who is white, based on a recent recommendation of a department disciplinary judge. He said it was clear Pantaleo "can no longer effectively serve as a New York City police officer."

"None of us can take back our decisions," O'Neill said, "especially when they lead to the death of another human being."

Asked whether Mayor Bill de Blasio forced his hand, O'Neill said the dismissal was his choice. "This is the decision that the police commissioner makes," he said, calling Garner's death an "irreversible tragedy" that "must have a consequence."

Video of the confrontation led to years of protests and calls by black activists and liberal politicians for Pantaleo to lose his job. City officials had long insisted that they could not take action until criminal investigations were complete.

A state grand jury declined to indict Pantaleo in 2014. Federal authorities, however, kept a civil rights investigation open for five years before announcing last month they would not bring charges.

Police Chokehold-Death

FILE - In this May 13, 2019, file photo New York City police officer Daniel Pantaleo leaves his house Monday, May 13, 2019, in Staten Island, N.Y. After five years of investigations and protests, New York City's police commissioner on Monday, Aug. 19, fired Pantaleo, an officer involved in the 2014 chokehold death of an unarmed black man whose dying cries of "I can't breathe" fueled a national debate over race and police use of force. (AP Photo/Eduardo Munoz Alvarez, File)

Pantaleo's lawyer has insisted the officer used a reasonable amount of force and did not mean to hurt Garner.

You have free articles remaining.

Become a Member

Register for more free articles.
Stay logged in to skip the surveys.

De Blasio never said whether he believed Pantaleo should lose his job but promised "justice" to the slain man's family.

Garner's death came at a time of a growing public outcry over police killings of unarmed black men that sparked the national Black Lives Matter movement.

Just weeks later, protests erupted in Ferguson, Missouri, over the fatal shooting of teenager Michael Brown. And later in 2014, a man angry about the Garner and Brown cases shot two New York City police officers to death in their cruiser in retribution.

At a recent administrative trial at police headquarters, Pantaleo's lawyers argued he used an approved "seat belt" technique to subdue Garner, who refused to be handcuffed after officers accused him of selling untaxed cigarettes.

In a bystander's video, it appeared that Pantaleo initially tried to use two approved restraint tactics on Garner, who was much larger at 6-foot-2 (188 centimeters) and about 400 pounds (180 kilograms), but ended up wrapping his arm around Garner's neck for about seven seconds as they struggled against a glass storefront window and fell to the sidewalk.

The footage showed Garner, who was 43 at the time, crying out, "I can't breathe," at least 11 times before he fell unconscious. The medical examiner's office said a chokehold contributed to Garner's death.

Questions about the handling of the case have dogged de Blasio during his longshot run for president, with some protesters at the recent debate in Detroit chanting, "Fire Pantaleo."


(2) comments


Police officers have every right to defend themselves. Absolutely. No argument. And I have to believe that the vast majority of cops are aware of that AND that they have to be careful with that. That being said, if a suspect is running away, can't you just put one bullet in his right knee or something to stop and debilitate him? Do you have to put 6 or7 bullets into that suspect? The video of this incident showed several other officers around the one doing the choking. Could they not all help wrestle the bad guy into handcuffs instead of choking him to death? Defend themselves? Of course. But if that can be done by injuring or overcoming a bad guy, or making sure he has a gun or a knife before killing him, isn't that better? I know that sometimes it would be very hard to determine the presence of a weapon, and then your reaction is a difficult decision to handle. I get that. But if the guy is running away from you or rolling on the ground with no weapons in his hands telling you he can't breath, the "death penalty" is not called for.


GrandpaS - I’m not going to respond to all of your points. I will respond to one that may give you another perspective. You ask “ can’t you just put one bullet into his right knee or something”? Law enforcement and everyone else who is trained to carry a firearm is taught to stop the threat. They are not taught how to wound people. When an altercation takes place your adrenaline is spiking and you need to make sure you hit only what you are shooting at. When what you are shooting at is a threat to your life or the life of someone else it’s really important that you shoot to stop the threat. Wounding someone doesn’t always do that. Of course, every situation can be and often times is different. But you want the end result to be the same. And that’s to STOP the THREAT.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.