Subscribe for 33¢ / day

The long, smooth, record-setting ride on Wall Street is over. The stock market pullback that experts had been saying was long overdue has finally come.

Investor fears about higher interest rates escalated into rapid, computer-generated selling Monday that wiped out all the market's gains for the year. At one point, the Dow Jones industrial average dropped 1,000 points in less than an hour, and it ended with its worst day in more than six years. The Standard & Poor's 500 is now down nearly 8 percent from its record high, set a little more than a week ago.

Market professionals warn that the selling could continue for a bit. But many are also quick to say they see no recession looming, and they expect the strengthening global economy and healthy corporate earnings to help stock prices recover.

"The reasons for the increase in rates is the stronger economy," said Ernie Cecilia, chief investment officer at Bryn Mawr Trust. "The reasons are positive. It's not as if something like 2008 or financial Armageddon is coming."

The trigger for the sell-off came at the end of last week when a government report showed that wages across the country rose relatively quickly last month. While that's good for workers, traders took it as a signal that higher inflation may be on the way, which could push the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates more quickly than expected. Higher rates not only make it more expensive for people and companies to borrow, they can also drive investors away from stocks and into bonds.

The sell-off Monday was so steep that some market-watchers blamed automated trading systems. These systems are programmed to buy and sell based on several variables, and they may have hit their sell triggers following the first wobble for stock prices after an unusually placid run.

That may mean even more volatility in the coming days, something that investors haven't had to deal with during a blissful year-plus of record-setting returns. Before Monday, the S&P 500 index had gone a record period of time — roughly 400 trading days — without a drop of even 5 percent.

Monday was also the first day in office for the new chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, and investors are wondering how closely he will stick with the low interest-rate policies set by his predecessor, Janet Yellen.

Still, many market-watchers said they remain optimistic that stocks will recover.

Despite worries about interest rates, they still see a recession as a long shot. With economies growing around the world, profits for U.S. businesses are expected to continue rising, and stock prices tend to follow the path of corporate earnings over the long term.

"The rate worries have been the trigger" for the stock market's swoon, said Melda Mergen, deputy global head of equities at Columbia Threadneedle. "But fundamentally, we don't see any new news. It's earnings season, the time that we get more direct feedback from our companies, and we don't see any concerns."

More than half the companies in the S&P 500 have told investors how they performed in the last three months of 2017, and most have topped analysts' expectations, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. Even more encouraging is that more than three quarters of them made more revenue than expected, which means it's not just cost-cutting and layoffs that are allowing companies to earn more.

The White House cited some of those trends Monday and said "long-term economic fundamentals ... remain exceptionally strong."

President Donald Trump, unlike his predecessors, bragged repeatedly about stocks as the market rose. Monday, he avoided the topic as they plunged.

During the bull market of the last year, Trump complained that the media weren't giving him credit for record highs in securities values.

"I mean, it's something that's pretty amazing," he said to a group of mayors last month, in characteristic remarks, citing an estimate of $8 trillion in added wealth.

He also has said that the market would have lost 50 percent of its value had Hillary Clinton won the election, a claim that he repeated publicly during a recent speech to global leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The assertion is impossible to prove or disprove.

Trump's comments came despite frequent reminders from fact checkers and others that stocks began rising during the tenure of former President Barack Obama. In his administration, Obama and his aides were especially careful to avoid making comments about the market, for fear that the president would be blamed when it fell, as markets inevitably do.

During Monday's market plunge, Trump was delivering a speech touting his tax cuts at a factory in Cincinnati, calling employees to the stage to discuss the gains they expected to make as a result of changes in the tax laws and what they intended to do with bonus checks they were receiving.

Trump did not mention the falling market, but as he bragged about the soaring economy, all three cable news channels airing the speech displayed graphics showing the market dropping in real time. As the speech wore on and stocks continued falling, all three -- including Trump-friendly Fox News -- pulled away from the speech entirely to report on the Dow.

If the stock market does indeed bounce back, though, many market-watchers expect returns to be more muted than in prior years because prices have already climbed so high. The S&P 500 is up nearly 292 percent since bottoming in early 2009.

And investors should remember that drops like those of the past two days aren't a unique occurrence for stocks. They're inherently risky investments, and investors should be prepared to see drops of 10 percent. Such declines happen so regularly that analysts have a name for them: a market correction.


Associated Press writer Darlene Superville in Washington contributed to this report.


(3) comments


Trump"ll blame it on Obama.
Whadyya wanna bet ?


He took credit for all the economic gains started during the Obama administration, so, yeah, he'll lay this on Obama as well.


Are we dealing in facts or just making things up again, Cassandra?

Let's look at the Dow Jones during the past decade. Things have been going pretty well but focus on the last two years of Obama's presidency. I've included a link with a picture of the trend which shows it was largely flat for those final two years of Obama's presidency with some pretty significant hiccups from Dec. of 2014 until Nov. 3, 2016 (the day after Trump was elected). The day after the election, the Dow trended sharply upward and only yesterday showed any sign of slowing. Yes, technically, it started during the Obama administration but it started the day after Trump was elected. If you're being honest, you can't say the gains over the past year had much to do with Obama.

Here's a picture:

After Trump took office, the markets set record gains. You can deny it had anything to do with Trump. However, if you do, you can't realistically attribute those gains to Obama either. The markets were sputtering along, not doing badly or particularly well. If anything, perhaps the country saw renewed confidence in the US economy after Trump was elected. The market has reflected this over the course of the past year. #MAGA Certainly, you'll disagree.

We're a year in to Trump's presidency. The gloom you trib-libs predicted (nay, practically prayed for) has not occurred. The country remains intact. The economy is doing well. Unemployment is down.

The nuclear war with North Korea many of you insisted Trump would start on approx. day 3 of his term in office has not come to pass although the State of Hawaii issued a false missile warning causing wide-spread panic among citizens who feared they had minutes to live because the apocalypse had begun. Afterward, the Democrat Governor of that state didn't blame Kim Jong-un for the nuclear unrest in the world caused by the real despot running North Korea and firing ballistic missiles toward Hawaii. Nope, he blamed Trump! HA! It is so predictable.

Heck, Tom Fitzpatrick wrote a hysterical little diatribe in this paper right after this Hawaii thing happened where he seemed disappointed (YES! DISAPPOINTED!) that Trump didn't fire a retaliatory strike at North Korea in response to the non-attack on Hawaii. He wrote, "Were our forces preparing to fire a retaliatory response against North Korea, and if so, when would that occur? If not, why not?" Just... Wow! You commented on the article, "The test alerts would not even be necessary if not for Trump's bellicose ranting." You, Fitzpatrick and Hawaii's Governor must all be drinking the same KoolAid.

You Democrats seem downright miserable that our country isn't in ruin. #TrumpDerangementSyndrome

Cheer up! [beam]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.