Subscribe for 33¢ / day

The state Department of Natural Resources’ policy board on Wednesday approved a controversial plan to add 200 miles of routes for all-terrain vehicles through Wisconsin’s largest state forest.

The master plan amendment for the 236,000-acre Northern Highland-American Legion State Forest is a landmark victory for ATV advocates, and a dramatic first step in the DNR’s statewide search for ATV routes that can be built in parks and natural areas.

It was mandated by Gov. Scott Walker and the Legislature after years of campaign contributions and lobbying by ATV manufacturers. State government spends millions supporting off-road vehicle use, including paying for construction and maintenance of trails, mostly in county forests until now.

The Natural Resources Board unanimously approved the state forest plan with scant discussion of concerns raised by DNR staff, the public and scientific researchers that ATV noise, dust and trampling of wildlife habitat are likely to drive away hikers, campers and some hunters.

And the board told the DNR to open up even more of the forest to motor vehicles than department staff had proposed.

Board members added a master plan provision calling for the department to remove an unspecified number of soil berms that block access to hundreds of miles of back-country roads.

Opening the roads for cars and trucks would help elderly hunters who can’t walk long distances, board members said. They acknowledged that ATVs might also use the opened-up routes. The berms keep park visitors away from logging operations.

In an interview with the Wisconsin State Journal before the meeting, board chairman Terry Hilgenberg said the cost of adding the motorized trails and modernizing campgrounds — which could run in the millions of dollars — was too high, but he didn’t address that concern during the meeting.

Terry Hilgenberg


Before approving the master plan, the board reduced the number of rustic campgrounds the plan designated for modernization. DNR staff had listed five rustic campgrounds for installation of flush toilets and electrical hookups. But landowners near the Big Lake campground contacted board members to object, so the board eliminated that project.

Modern amenities are designed to meet demand park administrators say they have observed from campers.

The DNR estimated a $450,000 cost for each new shower building with flush toilets and $250,000 for each bathroom with flush toilets, plus $250,000 for each sewage system pump station. Adding electric hook-ups would cost $4,000 to $5,000 per campsite.

The master plan didn’t estimate the cost for developing 200 miles of ATV routes, but construction of much shorter routes was once estimated at more than $5 million.

State parks director Ben Bergey said he was working on a funding proposal that the governor and Legislature could consider for the next state budget less than two years from now.

Paying for trails

The DNR hasn’t determined where all the ATV routes would be built. Most of the mileage is expected to follow primitive forest roads.

The master plan includes a map showing 42 miles of future ATV routes, but some were being reevaluated because they ran too close to an osprey nesting area.

In 2008, the board rejected 49 miles of trails that followed some of the same route through the southern part of the state forest south of Sayner. The price was $5.4 million or $110,000 per mile. An alternative in the northwestern part of the forest was $179,000 per mile.

One cost factor was building major bridge systems and boardwalks over wetlands and streams. And there was difficulty avoiding private land. Private property owners have been unwilling to allow ATV access because of potential for property damage and noise, advocates for off-road recreation say.

In 2008, DNR staff said the trail option near Sayner was likely to raise hackles because it ran close to recreational facilities such as a bike trail, three rustic campgrounds, and a natural area encompassing Bittersweet and Prong lakes.

Hilgenberg said Tuesday that if the ATV industry wanted expensive trails on public land it might need to come up with some money.

“If all you ATVers and UTVers want this stuff, you’re going to have to figure out how we’re going to pay for it because we don’t have the money,” Hilgenberg said. UTVs are utility terrain vehicles, which are larger than ATVs.

Currently, the state is sending money to ATV user groups.

About $6 million a year in fuel and registration fee revenue help support motorized recreation, including nearly $4 million a year in ATV trail maintenance grants that often go to ATV clubs. Another $500,000 annually in borrowed money is allocated for ATV and snowmobile facilities, including trails. And nearly $300,000 annually goes to a nonprofit set up by the state ATV association to promote safety.

The DNR has identified potential sites for ATV routes in a process it calls “recreational opportunities analysis.” It completed analysis for a large portion of northern Wisconsin and is working on two others, including one that tentatively lists DNR properties for ATV access.

Specific proposals are most likely to come forward in park master plans. The department has four master plan revisions in the works, and they will go to the Natural Resources Board for approval in the next six months, said DNR spokesman Jim Dick.

The DNR accepts public comment in both the writing of recreational opportunities analyses and revising of master plans.

Hilgenberg and board member Frederick Prehn said they want the DNR to find ways to ensure that the voices of individual campers, hikers and hunters are heard to supplement opinions from organizations for motorized vehicle users, hunters and others that already exert influence.

“If all you ATVers and UTVers want this stuff, you’re going to have to figure out how we’re going to pay for it because we don’t have the money.” Terry Hilgenberg, Natural Resources Board chairman

(2) comments


Most States are adding ATV trails, and do you know why - because there are people who enjoy this type of recreation. I would say to you don't walk on a trail marked for ATV use and you won't have perceived difficulties with them. Although the FEW hikers I have ever encountered on the trail were very friendly, except for one couple who didn't want to let us pass. A video of them and a threat to turn them in to DNR prompted them to finally let us pass. Hiking only let us see a small portion of a resource, but an ATV opened up a huge area to enjoy the beauty. Also, in my experience more hikers and hunters are doing the trespassing then ATV operators.


This is a sad day for Wisconsin - the incessant noise and pollution will be the death of peace and quiet most sought and enjoyed in the north/outdoors. We have increasingly gone to other states and areas to avoid the level of ATV insanity already. So now you put an end to a great segment of our northern tourism. Other factors - the erosion and impact on our wildlife. Why do our lawmakers only favor the fossil fuel and motorsports tourism industry? We spend a great deal of money without all the detrimental effects on our earth/environment - not to mention the oft complained about trespassing by ATV riders. Not to mention the rudeness, the disrespect inflicted on hikers and campers. One more decision made by city folks in the southeast Wisconsin districts who only listen to lobbyists from big business - not actual common sense users and property owners of the north. So very Sad!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.