Try 3 months for $3
State Rep. Jimmy Anderson, D-Fitchburg

State Rep. Jimmy Anderson, D-Fitchburg, left, who is paralyzed from the chest down, says Assembly Republican leaders broke state law by not enabling him to participate in a lame-duck session last month. Anderson said GOP leaders would not tell him when votes would be held on a controversial bill package considered during the session, which Anderson says caused him to miss voting on the measures -- which he opposes.

A Fitchburg Democratic state lawmaker who is paralyzed from the chest down contends Assembly Republican leaders broke state law last month by not telling him when early-morning votes would be held to enact a package of controversial laws during a lame-duck session — and he’s asking that those votes be voided as a consequence.

Rep. Jimmy Anderson, D-Fitchburg, said in an interview with the Wisconsin State Journal this week that he will file a complaint Thursday with Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne.

But a conservative legal group, Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, said in a statement Wednesday that Anderson’s complaint is baseless because the state Supreme Court previously held that courts cannot hear open-meetings-law complaints against the Legislature.

By filing the complaint, an advance copy of which was provided to the State Journal, Anderson said he is asking Ozanne to file suit against Assembly GOP leaders, alleging they violated a provision of the state open meetings law. It says that “no duly elected or appointed member of a governmental body may be excluded from any meeting of such body.”

Anderson was not present for key votes on the controversial lame-duck laws that he opposes, one of which curtailed the timeline for early voting and the powers of the governor and attorney general.

He said that happened after he asked Assembly Republican leaders, the night before the vote, when it would be held — but got no answer. The offices of Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke did not respond Wednesday to requests for comment.

Anderson said health and logistical issues related to his disability — he was paralyzed in a 2010 car accident and uses a wheelchair — prevented him from being able to sit in the state Capitol all afternoon and night, waiting for votes to be held.

Anderson said he must coordinate his arrival and departure from the Capitol with health aides who drive him and help with other tasks. Anderson also said doctors have advised him, for health reasons, not to sit in his wheelchair for more than 16 hours at a time.

Lawmakers originally planned to convene the afternoon of Dec. 4 to pass the bill package but instead held a series of closed-door meetings throughout the afternoon and overnight. They emerged in the predawn hours Dec. 5 to convene the session and pass the bills, sending them to former Gov. Scott Walker, who later signed them.

“I just remember waking up and the vote had already happened. I was frustrated,” Anderson said. “I represent my district and I’m supposed to be there to act in the process.”

Anderson later was able to have his votes paired on two of the bills — a process by which two lawmakers, typically from opposite parties, agree to withhold what would be offsetting votes to account for an excused absence. The paired vote becomes part of Assembly record but does not count toward the official vote tally.

Anderson said he raised concerns with Assembly GOP leaders on at least one other occasion, in 2017, about how issues related to his disability require that he have advance notice of early-morning votes.

In the case of the lame-duck laws, Anderson’s vote would not have been decisive — the bills passed easily in the Assembly, where Republicans have a 63-36 majority. Still, Anderson noted he also wasn’t able to cast procedural votes related to the bills or speak against them during the Assembly debate.

According to the state open meetings law, “any action taken at a meeting of a governmental body held in violation of” it “is voidable” upon an action brought by the state attorney general or local district attorney.

Ozanne could not be reached Wednesday to comment on Anderson’s complaint.

Tom Kamenick, deputy counsel for Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, issued a statement saying Anderson’s complaint lacks merit.

“To avoid violating separation of powers principles, courts will not review whether the Legislature followed its own rules or procedural statutes” with the exception of constitutional requirements, Kamenick said.

Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, said in a statement that the state Supreme Court “did in fact conclude that the courts do not have jurisdiction over how the Legislature seeks to interpret the open meetings law.”

But Lueders added he believes marathon meetings by lawmakers into the wee hours of the night violate the spirit of the open meetings law.

“This is an abusive practice precisely because it deprives people the ability to observe the Legislature in real time, which is an ideal the law seeks to protect,” Lueders said.

Anderson said the issues that arose last month were particularly jarring because he said most lawmakers and legislative staffers have been very helpful addressing issues related to his disability since he took office in 2017.

The Assembly sergeant-at-arms office has gone to lengths to ensure he can participate fully, Anderson said, such as building a device to help him cast votes on the Assembly floor. They also have provided a special clip-on microphone to Anderson that allows him to give speeches on the Assembly floor while the chamber is in session.

“This is the first time I’ve ever run into an instance where the Legislature has put up a barrier in front of me and said ‘No, you’re not allowed to participate,’” Anderson said. “It’s hurtful and it’s wrong.”

Assistant Assembly Democratic Leader Dianne Hesselbein, D-Middleton, said she applauds Anderson for bringing the complaint and “highlighting this issue.”

“They’re not giving him reasonable accommodations, and that’s all he’s asking for,” Hesselbein said.

Subscribe to Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(3) comments

Rick Czeczok

Did any other legislator miss the votes? Or was the ownness on him to be there. Did anyone else have any problem knowing when the votes were to take place? I'm sorry things happened in his life that make things harder for him, but he did take this on, and it's his responsibility. Stop blaming others.

Tommy Duncan

This is an orchestrated stunt to subvert the legislative process. Please note his vote would not have changed the outcome. Please also note that if the rules of the Assembly needed to be changed to accommodate him those changes should been requested long ago. ---This is a case of Democrats not liking a democratic outcome and seeking any means to overthrow the result.

Tommy Duncan

A few questions: ---> Suppose a lawmaker has a migraine and decides to go home until a vote is called. Does that lawmaker have a responsibility to notify others that he needed to be called in for the vote? Do the members of his caucus have a responsibility to make sure he is notified? If the migraines are a common occurrence, does the lawmaker have a responsibility to keep a cot in his office for these circumstances?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.