{{featured_button_text}}

Gov. Tony Evers and other Democrats on Thursday introduced a so-called “red flag” bill that would require people perceived as threats to surrender their firearms.

But in a move that diverted attention from more widely supported gun control measures he is trying to get passed, Evers told reporters he would “consider” a mandatory gun buyback program to reduce the number of firearms in the state.

His openness to the idea, floated by Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke last week, drew immediate criticism from Republican leaders, who claimed Evers’ call for a red-flag law exposed a more “radical” agenda.

“Today, in a partial answer to a reporter’s question, Gov. Evers revealed Democrats’ real agenda: taking away firearms that are lawfully owned, which is unacceptable,” Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau, said in a statement. They also said red-flag legislation undermines due process and Second Amendment rights.

During the governor’s news conference, a reporter asked Evers if he would support a mandatory buyback program.

Evers first said he’s focused on red-flag and universal background check legislation, but when pressed, said he’s open to the idea of mandatory buybacks.

“I’d consider it, but my focus is on these two bills,” Evers said.

O’Rourke, a former Texas congressman, turned heads during the presidential debate last week when he proclaimed, “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” in arguing that guns meant for warfare should be banned. He called for a mandatory buyback of assault-style rifles to prevent gun violence after a mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso in early August.

A recent NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll found 46% of Americans oppose mandatory assault weapon buyback programs, while 45% support them. But it also showed 83% of Americans support universal background checks and 72% would back a national red-flag law.

Evers, Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul and legislative Democrats called on the Republican-controlled Legislature to take up gun control bills after dual mass shootings more than a month ago in Ohio and Texas that left 31 people dead. Republican lawmakers, however, are unlikely to pass any of the legislation proposed and have so far ignored Democrats’ calls for increased gun control.

“I have consistently run for office and been elected on protecting and expanding Second Amendment rights,” Sen. Van Wanggaard, R-Racine, said in a statement. “I don’t intend to change that promise now.”

Democrats argued officials can no longer wait to take meaningful action to stem gun violence. While not currently a priority of his, Evers said he would consider a gun buyback program in which civilians must sell their privately owned guns to the government to reduce the number of firearms in circulation.

“Each and every day, elected officials choose to not take gun violence seriously,” Evers said. “That’s a choice that has consequences. It’s way past time to get something done.”

You have free articles remaining.

Become a Member

Register for more free articles.
Stay logged in to skip the surveys.

Evers, echoing prior statements, said he’d call a special session of the Legislature to force lawmakers to consider gun control measures if they don’t act on their own within weeks. In a special session, the governor calls the Legislature into session and designates what bills he or she wants the Legislature to work on.

While lawmakers under this scenario may have to meet, they do not have to pass any legislation, so the impact of such a move is limited.

Bill introduced

The red-flag bill, introduced by Rep. Melissa Sargent, D-Madison, and Sen. Lena Taylor, D-Milwaukee, comes a month after Democrats introduced a bill that would expand background checks to apply to private gun sales in the state.

Red-flag laws are also known as extreme risk protection orders. The bill by Sargent and Taylor would create a process for a law enforcement officer, family member or household member to petition a court to temporarily prevent a person perceived to be a threat to themselves or others from possessing a firearm.

The bill mirrors a Wisconsin law already on the books that prohibits the possession of a firearm by those under restraining orders or injunctions for domestic abuse, child abuse, harassment or elder abuse. In 2014, the Republican-controlled Legislature passed and former Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill that established a procedure to take guns from domestic abusers.

Fitzgerald previously said the combination of those laws “already qualifies” as a red-flag law, adding that he’d be open to considering ways to expand them.

Focus in court

Gun control advocates say red-flag laws have one clear advantage over laws that restrict gun possession by those subject to restraining orders: The entire focus of a red-flag court hearing is gun possession, while that factor is secondary in hearings for restraining orders.

They say there’s often less reluctance by courts to follow through with actually seizing firearms under red-flag laws.

Sargent said those found to have made a false claim against someone under a red-flag law could be subject to a felony charge.

“Red-flag laws — they won’t do everything, but they will save lives,” Taylor said.

Be the first to know - Sign up for News Alerts

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
2
3
0
0
14

(7) comments

Allisonn Landon



-End all deportations of illegal aliens (if you get here, you stay.)

-Voting rights for non citizens.

-Massive tax increases.

-Increase refugee's from the third world.

-Non citizens allowed to hold public office.

-Socialism.

-Open Borders.

-Sanctuary Cities.

-Decriminalize illegal entry into our country.

-De-fund & terminate Border Patrol & ICE.

-Disarming Americans.

-Free abortions for all (Taxpayer funded)

-Green new deal.

-End of Electoral College

-Free medicare care for all including non citizens (taxpayer funded)

-!00% free college for all, including non citizens. (tax payer funded)

-Reparations.

-Convicts, terrorists voting.

-Susie & Bobby using the same restrooms.

-Late term abortions up to 9 months.

-Infanticide.

-Pay check for every person in the US even if they choose not to work.



(Democrat-Socialist 2020 Platform & Goals)



*Sources: Straight from the Democrat's themselves. View their speeches / debates on you tube. Pay particular attention to when the moderator asks the candidates to "raise your hand" if in favor questions.



The choice is yours.

lutefisk

You voted for the premise of legal weed and got this

johnnybragatti

Like Wiz taking the wiz or giving the climatedope a gun and what do you get? Massmurder comes to America"s Dairyland, with,at least two "individuals, who are quite obviously not "playin" with a full deck". Pretty scary thought ,but thank the Lord for Evers and a freight train load of common sense., from "libtards", nonetheless.

Mr Wizard

We are never going to get the results we all want in regard to gun violence by punishing the good guys. Until the bad guys are held accountable for their crimes to the fullest extent possible no responsible person is going to consider giving up their personal liberties. Enforcing existing gun laws and not expunging criminal records of minors when they reach the age of 18 will do a lot more to curb gun violence than any red flag law.

capedcrusader

It’s hard for me to take anyone seriously who is against common sense laws. How is having this one “punishing the good guys”?

DMoney

In regards to magazine capacity, I purchased a stock Glock 17 gen4. No modifications, no alterations. The magazine holds 17 rounds of a 9mm caliber. That would be banned, according to recent opinion. The examples used are "high capacity magazines" that carry 100 rounds. But the ban would include everything down to 10 rounds. Which makes me, a law abiding citizen, a felon if I don't turn my magazines in. We'll, I won't. And I am a good guy, who's sane. What about the bad guys? They going to cooperate? Yeah right.

lutefisk

How did you get so ....stupid? Think man think

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.