Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.

Dave Skoloda: Speak up to protect farmland

  • 0

On a recent Google Meet social hour with friends, I mentioned that I had been reading the La Crosse County Farmland Protection Plan earlier that day.

The laughter that followed was predictable, I suppose, and I had to admit it did appear that I was pretty desperate for reading material.

It only made things worse when I explained that I was just checking on something Gretchen had read recently in the legal notices in the Tribune. More laughs. What a boring couple we are, readingwise. Maybe otherwise, too. But I digress.

She noted at breakfast one morning that there were two more notices in the La Crosse County legals for a conditional use permit for a non-farm residence in a farmland preservation district.

This was about the same time that crops in Iowa and much of the Corn Belt were flattened by an extreme storm, a derecho — another reminder of the rising uncertainty of future food production because of our climate crisis.

With the world’s population growing, we are likely to need all the land we can keep to meet rising demand for food. And, given the demonstrated risk to the food supply chains from pandemic or other disruptions, local sources of food production, i.e. land, are vitally important as well.

So the visit to the county plan was a quick reality check. Yes, there is a county commitment to saving agricultural land, especially prime farmland.

Exclusive and General Agricultural Zoning was created by the county to “protect prime agricultural lands, to limit the residential uses on prime farmland, and to allow owners of farmland and those persons earning a living by farming to receive tax incentives.”

Still, even with farmland protection measures in place here and in various forms in all states across the country, farmland continues to disappear, according to a study published earlier this year by the American Farmland Trust.

Between 2001 and 2016, 11 million acres of farmland and ranchland were converted — 4.1 million to urban and highly developed land use and nearly 7 million to low-density residential land use, according to the AFT.

“Surprisingly, we find that low-density residential land use is as much of a threat to farmland as traditional urban and suburban development,” the study said.

It added that more than 2,000 acres of ag land are converted every day including our most productive, versatile and resilient land.”

One need only drive east of Holmen on County Highway D to see the large-lot subdivisions on former farmland for evidence of that continuing shift in land use. Or the twin homes on a former bean and corn field on Sand Lake Road.

In Wisconsin during the years of the AFT study some 249,800 acres of farmland were developed or compromised, of that 83,700 was rated as best ag land and of the land converted 71,600 acres went to low-density residential development.

In the years for which the county furnished data, land in farms in the county declined from 158,718 acres in 2012 to 144,334 in 2017.

The county’s farmland preservation plan notes that with steep hills, wooded valleys and river systems there is a smaller area available for agriculture so the need to preserve already limited areas “ for the economic benefit and additional environmental protection that these agricultural areas will provide...”

That’s as close as the plan comes to making explicit the environmental service need that has become critical in recent years to respond to climate change.

The AFT study points out that “climate change, including increases in frequency and intensity of extremes has adversely impacted food security.” AFT cited the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finding that less productive and degraded agricultural lands restrict what can be grown and reduce the soil’s ability to absorb carbon.

It is that dual role — both food production and providing a natural solution for climate change — that makes preserving farmland vital.

Agriculture can help combat climate change. The 2019 IPCC report confirmed that this is not only possible, but necessary. Regenerative farming practices that build soil health and sequester carbon are among the most cost-effective and immediate climate solutions.

If all the world’s farmers and ranchers used these practices, every year they could sequester enough carbon to offset 10 to 20 percent of global fossil fuel emissions, the report said.

As it happens, the county is in the early stages of planning for a 10-year update of the farmland protection plan passed in 2012 . Charles Handy, La Crosse County planner, said in an email that he is drafting a public participation plan.

Here is an opportunity for local action whether for climate activists, for those promoting development of local food production and markets and for those in conventional ag operations to have incentives to preserve their farmland.

Land becomes more precious with every pound of carbon being pumped into the atmosphere and with every increase in demand for local food as well as food for the world.

Handy said, “Public input is the biggest driving factor as to what the goals of the plan will include.”


Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News