Subscribe for 33¢ / day

Joyful Covfefe to you, my dearest rutabagas, and Happy Bigly to your family and friends. As you know, wordish things have falafelled over this past year, leading many of us to scratch our bugles in wonder as we snog through messages sent to us “directly” from our groinly leaders in Washington.

Maybe it’s because my day job is as an English professor, but I don’t like when words are shredded, dismembered or mauled. Words matter. Words are our currency; from them we form our concepts of reality. Most of us have to be able negotiate our lives without examining the meaning and reliability of every single word.

And that’s why I was more profoundly disturbed by the story reported by the Washington Post last week than I have been by any other single news item coming out of the Trump administration since our current president took office.

Even if you were wrapping presents the whole time, you’ve heard about how the Trump administration communicated to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that there are seven words to avoid, right? According to the Washington Post, workers within the Department of Health and Human Services (which oversees the CDC) were instructed to avoid “using certain words or phrases in official documents being drafted for next year’s budget.” The banned words include “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

The DHHS is the part of the federal government whose mission is to protect the health of all Americans and to provide “essential human services, especially for those least able to help themselves.”

You might think that “those least able to help themselves” could be regarded as “vulnerable,” but according to Trump’s administration, you could be wrong. You would think that a branch of the federal government dealing with disease control would be advocating for science and evidence, but you might be wrong.

You might think that the government’s mandate would include protecting the rights of women who want to preserve hard-won reproductive freedoms or transgendered people whose battles in the health care system are only one of the battles they must fight on many fronts, but you might want to reconsider your belief.

You replace “fetus” with “unborn child” and thereby begin to strip away women’s rights to make their own health care choices. You replace “transgender” with — I can’t even imagine what — and all you’re doing is mangling our country’s language to meet the needs of fundamentalist religious zealots.

I’ve never liked when anybody tells me what I can say or what I can’t.

I rebelled against those who thought we should “ban bossy.” Bossy is a reasonable word and not a bad attitude to possess, especially when you’re the boss.

I do not offer my students “trigger warnings” because only those who understand a work of literature can argue with it and, if appropriate, undermine the authority of it.

We teach children to “use their words.” We have to use ours — all of them.

You’ll remember that Orwell’s Big Brother wants to strip people of words because to do so is “to narrow the range of thought.” We learned in “1984” that “every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.”

That sounds like last week’s prescription for the CDC.

More unnerving than Orwell’s fiction concerning language, however, is philosopher Hannah Arendt’s fact about how the slicing, dicing and policing of language was used by Hitler’s regime during WWII: “The result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth,” Arendt wrote in “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” is that the “sense by which we take our bearings in the real world — and the category of truth versus falsehood is among the mental means to this end — is being destroyed.”

Banning words, phrases and books are all forms of linguistic and cultural eugenics, rendering us all more sterile, ignorant, unimaginative and unquestioning by forcing us into silence or, worse, into using deliberately butchered speech.

If we outlaw words, then only outlaws will have words.

Let’s use our words to celebrate, to retain our integrity, our dignity and our power as American citizens.

Subscribe to Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Gina Barreca is an English professor at the University of Connecticut and the author of “If You Lean In, Will Men Just Look Down Your Blouse?” and eight other books. She can be reached at www.ginabarreca.com.

2
0
0
0
0

(7) comments

PhysicsIsFun

It seems that upon further review these words were not exactly banned. What happened is that it was suggested that as the funds available for basic scientific research is drastically reduced researchers are advised to not us these words if they hope to get funding. This is in fact even worse. This current administration is dramatically reducing the funding to the C.D.C. They are also reducing funding for other forms of scientific research. Our country has had the progress we all have enjoyed, because of scientific research into all manner of areas. This short sided unimaginative administration ignores science and scientific research at our own peril.

allcav

Not totally accurate and very biased. This started in the CDC, not at the White House. A little fact checking will shed more light on this.

kingman10

according to all mainstream media outlets, from the NY times to the Post to all major networks it did indeed start at the white house. Even the national review has admitted that it is partially true. Now the bureaucrats at the white house and CDC are trying to back track and say it didn't really happen. Typical of this administration to do something or say something obvious and then try to spin and take back what was said or done. They got caught and now they don't want to admit it.

Climatehoax

You mean similar to fast and furious, Odummy denied knowing anyt’’hing about that when that debacle surfaced. Did you make a similar comment about this administration then?

kingman10

what's the matter hoaxer? can't follow the column here. Its about the seven words that can't be used. What the heck does fast and furious have to do with these seven words. I suppose you don't know the meaning of a lot of words so you get easily confused, and can't follow along. In that case you should just keep silent.

kingman10

how ridiculous, can't use certain words in the CDC because the Trump administration wants to control the language used. Can't have "science based" used because now science is now a matter of opinion and you can have opposite view of scientific research and still be right. This is without a doubt the dumbest thing to roll out of the whitehouse in many generations. It is fascism pure and simple, control the language and you control the people.

ChatterCat2

Hopefully, the workers at the Centers for Disease Control (and other agencies under overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services) responded appropriately to the White House’s request. Throwing the instructions away, they continued using the “forbidden” words and phases wherever suitable.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.