Subscribe for 33¢ / day

WASHINGTON — How does President Trump act when he feels on top of the economic and diplomatic world? As his influence solidifies within the GOP? As his poll numbers tick upward?

If a recent Cabinet meeting tirade is any indication, political security has not translated into magnanimity. According to press reports, Trump spent 30 minutes dressing down his homeland security secretary, Kirstjen Nielsen, for insufficient zeal in closing the southern border to illegal immigrants. One consistent source of tension between the two has been Trump’s desire to use family separation as a deterrent against illegal crossings.

Trump unbound is increasingly impatient with the excessive humanity of some of his own staff. This is not a problem he has, to be clear, with his chief of staff. Asked if family separation was cruel and heartless, John Kelly replied, “I wouldn’t put it quite that way. The children will be taken care of — put into foster care or whatever. But the big point is they elected to come illegally into the United States.” He described the family-separation policy as a “tough deterrent.”

No, pulling crying children from the arms of their parents is not heartless at all. They will be taken care of, “or whatever.” For Kelly and Trump, the defining characteristic of these migrants is their illegality, not their personhood or their dignity. This is the definition of dehumanization.

A few points. First, the debate over a border wall is a policy matter. The separation of children from their parents as a deterrent is a human rights abuse. And the Trump administration, at its highest levels, cannot tell the difference.

As usual, Trump and his team are operating in a complete vacuum of historical knowledge. Family separation is not new to America. It was essential to the practice of chattel slavery. If enslaved people were truly property, they could not also be husbands and wives, or constitute true families. If those emotional and moral bonds were conceded as valid, slavery’s whole structure of dehumanization would crumble. Which is exactly why abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe emphasized the cruel separation of families in “Uncle Tom’s Cabin.”

Inhuman immigration enforcement is not the moral or legal equivalent of slavery. But a nation with this history should take particular care when contemplating family separation as official policy. Few human beings would treat other human beings in this manner. Which is exactly why Trump and Kelly must present “illegals” as lesser beings defined by their criminality.

Second, if the deterrence of crime is the only standard we employ in immigration enforcement, what is the limiting principle? Why stop at the separation of families? Why not put able-bodied illegal immigrant children to work in salt mines? Why not plant landmines at the border? Why not strafe illegal immigrants from attack helicopters?

The answer, of course, is that America, by definition, has a higher standard than legality. Our country’s most basic commitment — and its limiting principle — is universal human rights and dignity. This does not prevent the government from enforcing reasonable immigration laws. It does forbid the government from inhumanity in the enforcement of immigration laws. And there is no definition of inhumanity that does not include the intentional separation of parents from their children.

The fragmentation of families can be a tragic byproduct of the criminal justice system. Many American children must visit a parent in prison. But if the breakup of families were proposed as a tough deterrent for crime — as a policy and a punishment — it would rightly be seen as a betrayal of American values. As it would be at our borders.

Third, Trump’s policy of family separation illustrates the swift downward spiral of demagoguery. In 2012, citizen Trump criticized Mitt Romney’s “crazy policy of self-deportation, which was maniacal. It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote. ... He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.” By his candidacy announcement tour in 2015, Trump had discovered the visceral appeal of presenting Mexican migrants as rapists and murderers. Now he feels comfortable proposing the punishment of children and the purposeful destruction of migrant families as a deterrent. And he feels comfortable because the Republican Party has surrendered, step by step, to his agenda of dehumanization.

Other American presidents have used their accumulated political capital for humanitarian goals. Trump is a leader who, as he grows politically stronger, is using his power to attack and exploit the weak and vulnerable. America’s president is the bullier of children.

Michael Gerson’s email address is


(8) comments


If keeping the family together is the fear, these parents should not try illegal entry, they know this is what happens, you threaten your children’s well being. The correct thing to do is apply for entry legally, why jeopardize the children. These remedies for illegal entry pale in comparison to Mexico and most other countries. If you feel that strongly about it, you can apply for sponsorship of these folks. Why subject others that abhor illegal immigration, step up and do what you think is right.


new2 you are a heartless idiot who would walk on broken glass with bare feet for Trump. These humans you talk about at the border are refugees! If they stay in their country they will die, they have no choice but to try and escape into this country. Taking their children away from parents is cruel beyond measure. I would think a so called prolifer like yourself would be outraged, but i was wrong. These people cannot just sit idly by and apply for a lengthy citizenship bureaucratic red tape while others are out to kill them. They should be given refuge status until it can be determined if they can enter permanently. They are trying to save their children's lives you idiot, it is this administration that is putting them at risk. You are one special heartless evil person.

Snow Cougar Mary Burke

They already left their country and are now in Mexico. Problem solved. No need to come here.

Build the wall. [thumbup][angry]


that from the prolifer snow job, who doesn't really exist.


Great column. I guess now we can count on the evangelical fundamentalists who support Trump to go to the president and point out to him that this is a terribly un-Christian policy that they will not abide with. Right.


oh I am sure of that homey, and all those so called pro lifers will line up and condemn these actions against children too, right?




Using someone's children as a deterrent is about as low as anyone can go. Separating families as an official policy smacks of fascism and tyranny. Seems to me the same thing was done in Germany over 70 years ago. How far this country has lost its moral and humane way is frightening. We now as a nation have no problem justifying torture, separating families, invading other countries, shooting our own citizens for no reason other than "I thought he had a gun." May God have mercy on this nation.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.