Try 3 months for $3

A polar vortex during global warming? How does that work? I researched NOAA, the National Weather Service and the Center for Science Education to find out. This is what I learned.

Ralph Knudson mug

Ralph Knudson | La Crosse

The northern hemisphere has two vortexes in the winter. The polar “jet stream” exists year-round as the wandering west-to-east stream of powerful winds seven miles above us that guides warm and cold fronts across the country as its looping pattern constantly changes. A much more northern polar “vortex” forms each winter about 30 miles above the earth, and is a tighter and more circular powerful windstream.

Both are created where polar high pressure cold air masses meet warmer temperate zone lower pressure air.

Where that happens, strong vortex winds develop because air flows from colder high pressures to warmer low pressures, to create a continuous circular cooling/warming swirl of air. Greater temperature differences between cold air and warm air makes faster, stronger winds, and smaller temperature differences create weaker and slower winds. The earth’s rotation underneath keeps these winds moving in a west-to-east continuous flow. The more southern jet stream is slower than the polar vortex because of smaller temperature differences creating it, so it flows in a changeable meandering pattern, similar to the way a slow-moving river meanders and changes.

With global warming, overall air temperature has gone up 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit, but polar air temperature has increased more than twice that. (Melting polar ice, exposure of more bedrock to warming sunlight creates more dark surfaces to absorb even more sunlight heat.) This reduces air temperature differences between polar and temperate zone air even more, which then causes a slower and more meandering jet stream flow.

This year, the jet stream wandered so much that it affected the polar vortex, causing it to break into two separate polar vortexes. On Jan. 28, one “daughter” polar vortex air mass was identified over Norway, Finland, Siberia and the north pole, while the other had wandered down over the Upper Midwest and drifted east toward New England. At the same time, Alaska and northern Greenland were quite warm (above freezing) because frigid polar air was elsewhere. When the polar vortex affecting us in the Midwest moved east, it was followed by unseasonably warm air flowing up from the south, creating the rapid thaw we now have.

As polar temperatures continue to warm (although still bitterly cold by our experience), we can expect more unpredictable and unusual winter weather extremes like this in future years. Thus, our recent severe cold spell was not proof that global warming is fiction, but actually is explained by known meteorology basics, and is a taste of even more similar polar events during otherwise warm winters.

I have to ask why this information has not been a key part of mainstream news media covering this massively disruptive national weather event.

Subscribe to Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Dr. Ralph Knudson resides in La Crosse.

1
0
0
0
0

(8) comments

DMoney

Climate change is a fact. Cause is debated but it seems logical that 7 billion hoarding, wasteful , polluting human beings would certainly have an impact.

Redwall

You probably mean plausible...many things are possible

Redwall

"I have to ask why this information has not been a key part of mainstream news media covering this massively disruptive national weather event."

Of course, Mr Knudson refers to the so-called Main Stream Media. The MSM was caught red-handed peddling much FAKE NEWS this last week, so you have to forgive them if they are a little shy on this topic.

But to directly answer Knudson's question: Because it is unprovable BS.

The earth is estimated to be 4.5 BBBBillion years old. Mankind appeared 200,000 years ago, and has been capable of measuring "global temperatures" for only a couple of decades, if that.

oldhomey

Ah, yes, Red, I also was intrigued by Mr. Knudson's comment, "I have to ask why this information has not been a key part of mainstream news media covering this massively disruptive national weather event."

However, I had an opposite reaction to it. It made me ask, just what mainstream media is it that Mr. Knudson has been getting his climate information from. I have been aware of this polar vortex information for years, and it was information I received from reading good newspapers, including this one. It has always been out there, and certainly during the polar vortex episode of last week I read this explanation in several newspapers.

If you cared to look at the scientific evidence and the methods of collecting and compiling it, Red, you would know how climate scientists can glean accurate data on carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere hundreds of thousands and hundreds of millions of years ago, linking those levels with the evidence of what was going on with the Earth in those same time periods. But you don't read anything except those things that support the views you already have. Heck, if we are to believe you -- which few of us do -- you don't even subscribe to this newspaper, let alone read it. So what do you know?

PhysicsIsFun

Red is a Republican. Republicans are not interested in Science or facts in general. They are too busy spreading their propaganda.

Redwall

What is the R Squared?

Redwall

What is the R Squared on the study you reference?

Of course you dont know...Look it up.

oldhomey

Hmm. Perhaps you point this study that I referenced? I was not aware that I singled out a study for your perusal. I am sure you can clear up this mystery for my poor, over-taxed mind so that I do not have to plunge into the extraordinarily large universe of climate change science to find out what the hell R Squared is. Perhaps it is what Redwall surrounds, the Red Square. Are you in cahoots with the Russians, too?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.