Try 1 month for $3

Secrecy in government, compounded by court-ordered secrecy, gives rise to speculation and rumor. That never serves the public interest.

A case involving Racine City Attorney Scott Letteney and Racine Alderperson Sandy Weidner illustrates that very well. Last August, the city attorney sought an ethics violation sanction against the alderperson for sharing allegedly confidential communications from his office with constituents.

Letteney called for a closed meeting of the executive committee of the city council, at which he presented a PowerPoint of about 30 slides, mostly emails from Weidner to constituents. The committee referred the matter to the Ethics Board for an advisory opinion.

Weidner fought back against the possible ethics sanction and asked Letteney for a copy of his PowerPoint slides. Letteney declined. Weidner filed a request for those records under the state’s open records law. Letteney denied that as well and Weidner filed suit in circuit court.

When the open records suit came before Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, he took the unusual step of sealing the entire case, including his decision. The judge told a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter in September that he sealed the case “because of the nature of the action. It’s one that shouldn’t be open. I made a public policy determination.”

State open-records advocates say they have never heard of an open-records suit being sealed.

In September, Weidner defied the judge’s order and talked to reporters, saying that nothing she had sent to her constituents, in her experience, was confidential. According to the Journal Sentinel article, Gasiorkiewicz’s decision and order “don’t seem to reveal anything specific.”

Soon after this article appeared, Letteney and the city of Racine, represented by a Milwaukee law firm, went back to court and asked for a $15,000 sanction for violating the court seal.

Judge Gasiorkiewicz found Weidner guilty of civil contempt of court and ordered her to pay the city’s legal fees. Weidner’s attorneys are appealing the open-records case and the contempt charges to a state court of appeals, where the case remains under seal. That’s where this fracas currently stands. The Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council and others are asking the appellate court to unseal these records.

Some city legal issues are legitimately confidential — personnel issues, proposed contracts or city property purchases come to mind. But if Letteney is arguing that all emails and communications from his office are top secret and not to be shared by alderpersons, we have a great deal of problem with that notion.

From what little we have seen through other media, most of Weidner’s “egregious” emails seem to be garden-variety legal issues and mundane, inconsequential communications from the city attorney’s office. But the closed city council session and the judge’s seal order have put these issues in a deep, dark hole, hidden from public view and impossible to judge.

We’re dismayed that the city attorney ever elevated it to a feud of this proportion. We’re dismayed, as well, that the court made a “public policy determination” to hide it from the public.

In our view such secrecy, on both levels, undermines the right of the public to assess how government officials are conducting public business.

We urge the court of appeals to set things straight, and we hope it does.

Subscribe to Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Your Right to Know is a monthly column distributed by the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council (, a group dedicated to open government. Council member Steve Lovejoy is editor emeritus of The Journal Times, Racine, which ran a longer version of this column as an editorial.


(5) comments


This is where we are headed as a democracy if GOP-style power politics as practiced today, using even the courts as a partisan cog in the machine, prevails.


Hmmm... I find it curious (though predictable) that you'd suggest this is GOP-style power politics when all of the players in this sh¡t show are Democrats.

Circuit Court Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz is a Democrat.
The Mayor of Racine is Cory Mason is a Democrat.
Scott Letteney the Racine City Attorney? Yes, a Democrat.
Letteny's hire as the city attorney was recommended by the former Mayor, John Dickert. Yeah, Dickert is a Democrat too. (...also a UW-L grad)
Let's not forget Alderperson Sandy Weidner. She's, she's also a Democrat.


Could be, crank, and I wouldn't tolerate from Democrats any more than Republicans. But writ large right now, this is the general trend of governance with a gerry-mandered minority government in power in Wisconsin about to try to cut the new governor off at the knees by reducing his ability to govern in Wisconsin, with a state court system ready to back their nefarious moves. And a U.S. government dominated by a minority party, installing a partisan Supreme Court, perhaps about to shut down an investigation of the worst, most corrupt and ethically-challenged human being ever to assume the presidency. The gerry-mandering happened in Illinois, too, but there it was the Democrats, not the GOP, and it is just as corrupt for my money as the GOP gerry-mandering in Wisconsin, Georgia and other states that is responsible for the political "red" wave in much of the nation the last decade. Corruption is corruption. Get rid of it in government before it rots out the heart of our democracy.


So many words... this story was about Racine! As expected, you attempt to change the subject rather than owning the lie that the GOP has anything at all to with it. Spin...spin...spin...

Perhaps you should restate you observation and classify this as Democrat-style power politics. Then it would be accurate.


Okay, crank, I will do as you ask. This Racine incident is, as you describe it, a Democrat-style power politics. There. Are you satisfied?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thanks for reading. Subscribe or log in to continue.