An article in the May 30 Tribune reported on La Crosse and Fond du Lac counties’ decisions to turn down the opportunity to build and operate regional juvenile corrections facilities.

The article included several comments from Rep. Michael Schraa, R-Oshkosh, criticizing these decisions. Rep. Schraa is a co-author of Wisconsin’s 2018 juvenile corrections reform legislation (Act 185). Specifically, Rep. Schraa stated: “I don’t think they (La Crosse and Fond du Lac counties) put a lot of effort into it;” counties were “dragging their feet;” and that counties were passing up a “golden chance” to run corrections by their own standards.

I feel the need to respond.

La Crosse County Board Chair Tara Johnson


La Crosse County devoted significant effort in both analyzing the viability of operating a regional juvenile corrections facility and in collaborating in good faith with state lawmakers. La Crosse County’s efforts included spending $28,000 on a preliminary architectural study as well as more than 600 hours of staff time engaged in the following:

  • Providing information to lawmakers through testimony, phone calls and a tour of the La Crosse County juvenile detention facility
  • Attending a Department of Corrections information and discussion session
  • Facilitating meetings with surrounding counties
  • Designing and costing out a staffing and service structure
  • Analyzing impacts on local tax levy
  • Designing the layout for a facility
  • Attending phone and in-person planning meetings facilitated by the Wisconsin Counties Association

In the end, it became clear that the burden and risks for La Crosse County would be too much.

While reimbursement for 95%of the facility’s construction costs is certainly an incentive, we must also consider the long-term costs.

This includes $2.2 million in annual operating expenses above what La Crosse County currently spends on juvenile detention.

You have free articles remaining.

Become a Member

Register for more free articles.
Stay logged in to skip the surveys.

Offsetting these costs would require maintaining a census of 12 youth from other counties and charging a daily rate to those counties of approximately $500. La Crosse County taxpayers would be on the hook for any operating losses if out-of-county usage fell short (at a cost of $183,000 per youth).

Far from running corrections on our own terms, we would be forced to comply with intensive new state regulations.

Locating a site that would be accepted by local municipalities and residents would also be problematic. All this to assume responsibility for a state program which, because of our home-grown corrections alternative program, La Crosse County has not used in more than five years.

A lack of diligence does not explain the growing list of counties declining to assume responsibility for juvenile corrections.

Rather, it is a predictable result of the shortcomings of Act 185 and subsequent regulations.

Addressing these issues and finding a solution that serves all corners of Wisconsin may require additional collaboration and a resolve to make further legislative changes.

Criticism that minimizes county efforts does nothing to solve the very real problems in Wisconsin’s juvenile corrections system.

La Crosse County remains willing to help find a solution to the state’s vexing juvenile corrections challenges — one that does not overburden our local taxpayers or put them at significant financial risk.

Be the first to know - Sign up for News Alerts

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Tara Johnson is chair of the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors.


(4) comments


Here we go again. Why on earth would the County spend $28,000 on a "preliminary architectural study" when the project made no sense from a practical point of view?


"Offsetting these costs would require maintaining a census of 12 youth from other counties and charging a daily rate..." I found this passage particularly interesting. It is reflective of the move toward for profit prisons across the nation. It's a business model that monetizes the incarcerated, making the need for creating more and more "criminals" to keep the business funded.

Rick Czeczok

More studies paid for. That always gets things done. When will LaCrossse city and county learn how to walk and chew bubblegum at the same time and without someone holding their hand. New people are obviously needed to run these entities.


Comrade Zerocock would rather leap into expensive projects or forego them entirely rather than actually conduct a study to determine need and feasibility.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.