What happens when you kick the issue of road funding down the road for too long?

You get potholes — lots of potholes.

That’s our challenge in Wisconsin — deteriorating roads and an unsustainable revenue plan that can’t keep up with basic maintenance needs.

Our road quality has slipped dramatically in various ratings compared with other states — especially neighbors who have raised more money to fix their roads.

On one index, 32 percent of Wisconsin’s state highways are rated good. That compares to 52 percent for Iowa (which has approved a recent gas tax increase) and others that are much higher.

It’s a lousy report card — and we should be ashamed.

It’s one of the reasons we’re pleased that Craig Thompson has been nominated to lead the Wisconsin Department of Transportation.

Thompson is the longtime leader of the Transportation Development Association of Wisconsin, and he has come here and throughout the state laying out the consequences of our unwillingness to tackle the problem in a straightforward, nonpartisan fashion.

Potholes are nonpartisan, by the way.

During a visit with the La Crosse Tribune editorial board last week, Thompson talked about the backlog of road projects that need attention.

He said that when county engineers in Wisconsin were asked how long it would take to catch up with road maintenance and replacement needs on local roads with current revenues, the answer was 200 years.

Does anyone believe that’s acceptable?

It’s bad for business. It’s bad for tourism. It’s bad for all of us.

It’s not good for safety, either. The DOT secretary, by the way, gets an alert every time there’s a fatal accident in our state — a reminder that safety should come first.

Officials of companies that drive a lot of miles have said repeatedly during transportation forums in our area that they’re spending more to maintain vehicles and replacing them sooner because our roads have deteriorated.

There’s a cost to that, too — a big cost.

Let’s quit pretending. It won’t make the potholes disappear. If you want to see a bumper crop, just drive La Crosse Street. We’re pleased the DOT plans to move up pavement replacement to 2022 from the original schedule of 2025.

Gov. Tony Evers has recommended a variety of ideas for raising revenue to fix the roads. You may not like every idea, but we must invest more to increase safety.

His plans include:

  • Increasing the motor fuel tax by 8 cents per gallon. That would raise $485 million over the biennium. According to the state, if you drive 15,000 miles in a 2019 Honda Accord at 30 mpg, you’ll pay $3.33 more a month for gas.
  • Resuming indexing of gas tax and tie it to increases in the consumer price index beginning April 1, 2020. That would raise an estimated $42 million during the biennium.
  • Increasing registration fees for heavy trucks by 27 percent, raising $36 million over the biennium.
  • Increasing the title fee on original or transfer vehicle titles by $10, raising $36 million during the biennium.

There are other ideas, too, including repealing the minimum markup law, which certainly will stir controversy.

With the added revenue, the governor wants to pump an additional $320 million into the state highway rehabilitation program; $66 million for General Transportation Aids; $1.9 million for the local road improvement program; plus additional funding for public transportation, transportation for seniors and more funding for air traffic control, harbors and rail.

The other appealing part of this plan is to cut the percentage of debt service from 20 percent to 10 percent by the end of this year.

In other words, a dime of our money will go to pay off debt instead of 20 cents.

That means a lot more money goes to road repairs.

Goodness knows, our roads need it

Be the first to know - Sign up for Breaking News

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(9) comments


The new head of the DOT hasnt even had the job long enough to find the bathroom, but already knows we have to raise taxes in four different ways to solve the problem. What a joke.

Meanwhile, the City spends $25,000 on bilingual signs to hang in front of the public library and $75,000 for a mural on the side of the pump house. As this is happening, the State spends $10 million on a Cass Street roundabout no-one wanted, and $75 million to completely rebuild the I90/Hwy 53 interchange, when some road resurfacing would have accomplished more, quicker, and maybe without loss of life. I watched in amazement, as a taxpayer paid contractor from Little Chute Wisconsin (near Green Bay) crossed the state to plant 6-inch plants in the road median, none of which survived the summer.

The problem is management, or lack of it, not lack of funding. Taxpayer funds are wasted wantonly and recklessly instead of performing the core functions of government.

How many La Crosse potholes could be filled with $10 million? All of them.


I thought the Cass Street roundabout was 2.5 million?


$10 million. But for the sake of discussion, lets use your number.

So, how many La Crosse potholes can you fix with $2.5 million? All of them.

Keep the change.


Where are you getting that $10 million dollar number from? I just pulled up an article from Chris Hubbuch from 3/24/17 and he stated the cost at $2.3 million. Is that an exaggeration on your part kind of like new2lax exaggerating about the number of illegal immigrants at between 11 and 20 million?


The new head of the DOT has a Plan: Raise taxes in four different ways.



And the Tribune editors clap like seals.


What is your solution? And please be specific.


He has a magic plan that gets it all done for free. Maybe he can get some prisoners to do it. Republicans they make no sense to me.


Read my comments above; being smart about selection of projects is the next best thing to having it for free, compared to the current abysmal waste.

Remember, the only "free" thing in life is OldFoney's desire that I pay for his/her "free" health care.

Rick Czeczok

Like you have given a good idea in the time you have been flapping your jaw on this board. Your suggestion is always raise taxes to pay for it, yet you don't want your money touched. It's the New Socialist Party way. Now tell us again what a great teacher and mentor you were to the youth in high school. Then why did you get weeded out under the Walker plan of accountability of teachers and not having the union protect crappy teachers like you. Ya I sure want to listen to you.... Loser! Now bring it tell me how great you are and how your writing skills prove your brilliance as a teacher. Or tell us your real name that will shut me up once you prove that you were a good teacher. Be careful not to use someone else's name as that would get you in deep doo-doo. Like your going to tell us your name you hide like the coward you lived like. You and your mentor Old Homey.....

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.